Amare
Senior Member
The H4 seating had seat padding that was a lot thicker compared to the H5 and H6s.Honestly I have to agree that H4 style and NYC style seats are the better option for transit in terms of being easy to clean (and in NYC's case, vandalproof). They might as well switch to NYC seats, not like the current ones are significantly more comfortable anyway.
The original H5/6 seating was basically the same as the H4 in terms of seat covering, but without benches.
And how is the current cloth fabric any less of a fire hazard (if not more so)?
I dont recall the H4s seating having significant problems with puncturing, tears, holes, etc. The original H5 and H6 seats had scratch and tears because people would deliberately do damage to those seats. Miissussauga transit had similar seats to the H5/H6s installed in their buses before, but those were in worst shape compared to the TTCs because the TTC maintained those seats much better.
The fact of the matter is, the TTC is doing this because of costs/easier maintenance. They can try and sugar coat it and disguise it under whatever BS they want to, because most riders would agree that fabric seats are much more comfortable and I'm willing to bet the survey they conducted earlier said it. The issue riders have with the fabric seats is the level of cleanliness of them, and that boils down to cleaning standards/practices. Something that has taken a big hit throughout the years at the TTC.




