News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.8K     0 
The Golden Mile doesn't need to change but rather quite the opposite. It is essential that the Golden Mile stay zoned for exactly what it currently is...........commercial/industrial.

Uh, and I mean this question sincerely as I don't know where you live, have you ever been to the Golden Mile? The 'industrial' part of your 'commercial/industrial' went by the wayside sometime in the '70s. With a couple of exceptions, the Golden Mile is either big box stores, shopping centres, or strip malls. Lots of parking lots, lots of auto dealers. Centennial College has a campus in there somewhere to the north. This is not a high-tech industry hub in the making. It's not even the collection of small-industry textile and other businesses on Midland or the industrial places on Birchmount at Danforth. It's a vast sea of Walmarts/Eglinton Town Centres/Golden Mile Chevrolets. To spend $500M to elevate a train or billions to build a subway ignores the reality that there's plenty of land to build and LRT on -- the centre of Eglinton Avenue.

To compare Eglinton to the part of Richmond which the Canada Line bisects is absurd as well -- and I'm willing to bet that the idyllic setting of Richmond with its bike paths and density will look a lot different in 50 years when the concrete is stained and the bike paths tough to maintain.

Here's the Streetview at Warden:

http://tinyurl.com/d757x8n

And, as I said before, the Gardiner is only different because it's 2013, not 1963. They built the Gardiner specifically to cut off the industrial waterfront from the city centre. To build an elevated track on Eglinton is wilfully putting a train in the air because you want a train in the air. That's the only reason to do it.

Finally, apropos to the Leslie to Don Mills brouhaha -- quite frankly, while I think Don Mills had certain attractions (especially the OSC parking lot as a construction site) I think that minimizing changes that need to touch this toxic Mayor and Council is a HUGE win. Do not underestimate the damage Ford can do. Opening up any plan to his meddling is to invite disaster -- not necessarily because he actually wants disaster (although with transit that might be the case), but because he is incapable of complex decision-making or compromise.
 
Finally, apropos to the Leslie to Don Mills brouhaha -- quite frankly, while I think Don Mills had certain attractions (especially the OSC parking lot as a construction site) I think that minimizing changes that need to touch this toxic Mayor and Council is a HUGE win. Do not underestimate the damage Ford can do. Opening up any plan to his meddling is to invite disaster -- not necessarily because he actually wants disaster (although with transit that might be the case), but because he is incapable of complex decision-making or compromise.

Maybe not Ford specifically, but Denzil Minnan-Wong has never passed up the opportunity to muck things up in a deliberate, almost evil fashion.
 
Maybe not Ford specifically, but Denzil Minnan-Wong has never passed up the opportunity to muck things up in a deliberate, almost evil fashion.

Ok, but they (Metrolinx) stuck to their guns for the EA amendment regarding Mt. Dennis and it was passed by city council the same day Metrolinx announced the about face re: Brentcliffe-Don Mills!
 
Ok, but they (Metrolinx) stuck to their guns for the EA amendment regarding Mt. Dennis and it was passed by city council the same day Metrolinx announced the about face re: Brentcliffe-Don Mills!
Ah, but that was relatively non-contentious - and a significant improvement over the existing EA for the community. There'd likely have to be adjustments to the EA for Kennedy station as well ... and I expect that will fly through without much noise.
 
I dunno about Jaye Robinson, it seems to me that John Parker has been the one shouting about it (it's on the east end of his ward)
 
Jaye Robinson has been touting this as a victory for herself and the Leslie "residents" - the pockets of inward facing neighbourhood on Leslie from Eglinton to I suppose York Mills
 
I did say home building supplies {ie big box Home Depot} gas stations and where they buy their cars for a partial description of the Golden Mile.

My point was that some think LRT at grade is fine as it will create a more urban environment with higher density which is impossible.............when was the last time you say a big box store abandoned for residential? Grade separation would be much faster, reliable, less disruptive to build, have far higher capacity, be cheaper to operate due to automation, and , wait for it, CHEAPER to build. Yes, that's right cheaper to build because the underground stations could be much smaller than they are currently planned for if the system was automated as the frequency could be easily double the frequency of any non-grade separated system. One 40 meter subway station has the capacity of a 90 meter LRT station in a non-grade separated system.

Vancouver's Canada Line 50 meter stations are too small but will still have a higher capacity than Eglinton's 100 meter stations and are much cheaper and easier to build. The cost savings from smaller underground stations would offset the difference in price between an elevated DM to Kennedy section.
 
I did say home building supplies {ie big box Home Depot} gas stations and where they buy their cars for a partial description of the Golden Mile.

My point was that some think LRT at grade is fine as it will create a more urban environment with higher density which is impossible.............when was the last time you say a big box store abandoned for residential? Grade separation would be much faster, reliable, less disruptive to build, have far higher capacity, be cheaper to operate due to automation, and , wait for it, CHEAPER to build. Yes, that's right cheaper to build because the underground stations could be much smaller than they are currently planned for if the system was automated as the frequency could be easily double the frequency of any non-grade separated system. One 40 meter subway station has the capacity of a 90 meter LRT station in a non-grade separated system.

Vancouver's Canada Line 50 meter stations are too small but will still have a higher capacity than Eglinton's 100 meter stations and are much cheaper and easier to build. The cost savings from smaller underground stations would offset the difference in price between an elevated DM to Kennedy section.

OK, Emperor, put on some clothes. Your nonsensical arguments just hit rock bottom.
 
OK, Emperor, put on some clothes. Your nonsensical arguments just hit rock bottom.

Indeed. Amongst other things, Eglinton is automated and being built for 90 second frequencies.

One of the motivations for the tunnel into the yard was to allow trains to park themselves.


I'm still amazed that after 3 years SSIGuy contunes to refuse to read official documents on this and other projects which he appears, based on comment volume rather than comment content, to be very passionate about.
 
Last edited:
I'm confused, have they upgraded to an automated system that allows operation of RTs at grade?

Solid Snake: Thank you for showing what democracy is all about.
 
Last edited:
^^The ECLRT will utilize ATO in the tunnel and under driver control on the surface. No agency is going to run an automated system at grade without fully fencing the corridor off.
 
Amongst other things, Eglinton is automated and being built for 90 second frequencies.

We should realize that after they reverted back to the middle-of-the-road alignment between Brentcliffe and Don Mills, 90 second frequencies are not attainable on that section.

They still can try to operate at 90 sec between Yonge and Mount Dennis, but not east of Yonge.
 
We should realize that after they reverted back to the middle-of-the-road alignment between Brentcliffe and Don Mills, 90 second frequencies are not attainable on that section.

True.

TTC (or whomever ends up operating it) would run high frequency service (if necessary) to either Bayview and/or Brentcliffe Road though simply because turning back trains at a major transfer point is risky due to lengthening already long unload times.

The SRT will also likely remain automated, albeit a more effective version but still with a staff member onboard.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top