News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.8K     0 
And they've already said it will be increased to 80 km/hr before the line fully opens.
1.jpg
 
Is it like the Alstom problem where if the trains go too fast the bogies get messed up over time and the wheels eventually fall off?

The glory of low floor LRVs in full display...
😂You're about to be shouted down for lack of nuance, by others with similarly unnuanced takes.

Truth is low floors may be somewhat less reliable, partly because they're more costly to maintain, but that's no excuse for them capping speeds at 60 kph. The Flexity Freedom may be a lot better than the Citadis Spirit, but they're still far from being the most advanced or reliable by 2026 standards.

North American manufactured rolling stock seems to be hot garbage. Across the board. Technology decades behind, poor quality management, everything. Had this discussion about Toronto Rockets being heavy etc. recently. I am all for keeping industry and jobs local. But if they're consistently soiling the bed, then they deserve to be replaced by offshore competitors.
 
North American manufactured rolling stock seems to be hot garbage.
Everything manufactured in North America is junk.

Especially the overpriced hot garbage made by GM, Ford, Stellantis, etc. Even brands like Toyota/Lexus took a hit in quality when they were forced to bring manufacturing here under NAFTA.

Thankfully we're getting some Chinese EVs up here.
 
North American manufactured rolling stock seems to be hot garbage. Across the board. Technology decades behind, poor quality management, everything. Had this discussion about Toronto Rockets being heavy etc. recently. I am all for keeping industry and jobs local. But if they're consistently soiling the bed, then they deserve to be replaced by offshore competitors.
I don’t think that’s necessarily a fair assessment. Not for Canada anyway. Though there is a lot less rolling stock manufactured here currently. I haven’t heard of any major problems with Vancouver’s MK IIIs and Vs. Bombardier has cranked out BiLevels successfully for over 40 years. Other than early teething issues, I haven’t heard of majors problems with the TRs and Azur trains. The second batch of LFLRVs appears to have been delivered with no issues.
 
I'm looking forward to it, full stop. Cedarvale to Yonge-Eglinton will be 9 minutes, down from 20+ minutes on the bus. It's going to make it so much easier to go there and go north on Yonge by transit. It's going to be a huge quality of life change.

The one piece that I think is going to be really important to continue to put pressure on the city and province is completing the remaining streetscape improvements, including the bike lanes directly on Eglinton and also connecting to Eglinton. They were promised as part of this project and they need to be delivered.
Don't forget the 20 minutes to wait for the 32 to move through all the Allan traffic and turn into the station.
 
I'm looking forward to it, full stop. Cedarvale to Yonge-Eglinton will be 9 minutes, down from 20+ minutes on the bus. It's going to make it so much easier to go there and go north on Yonge by transit. It's going to be a huge quality of life change.

The one piece that I think is going to be really important to continue to put pressure on the city and province is completing the remaining streetscape improvements, including the bike lanes directly on Eglinton and also connecting to Eglinton. They were promised as part of this project and they need to be delivered.
Bike lanes aren't allowed in Ford's Ontario anymore...
 
I don’t think that’s necessarily a fair assessment. Not for Canada anyway. Though there is a lot less rolling stock manufactured here currently. I haven’t heard of any major problems with Vancouver’s MK IIIs and Vs. Bombardier has cranked out BiLevels successfully for over 40 years. Other than early teething issues, I haven’t heard of majors problems with the TRs and Azur trains. The second batch of LFLRVs appears to have been delivered with no issues.
You're not comparing it to any baseline. You haven't heard of any major problems... Those Skytrain rolling stock types seem fine, but then again, only 5 other cities run Innovia Metros, and basically none of them bought Canadian-built rolling stock post-opening. EDIT: 3 of 5 didn't buy Canadian-built rolling stock period.

Bombardier BiLevels are outdated tech, and the doors between trains often don't work properly, forcing people to use this switch to keep doors closed or open:

1770236828248.png

It begs the question, why haven't GO carriages been upgraded to proper open gangways? Probably cost and familiarity with the legacy stuff.

Maybe I should've been more specific, it's some combination of "technology decades behind, poor quality management, etc."
The Toronto Rockets are running 28 inch wheels (for continuity with older stock?) when most of the world has moved on to 30-33 inch wheels for new rolling stock. They also had their own problems, whether you think they're major is up to you: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/new-ttc-trains-performance-unacceptable-says-ceo-1.1211708

Flexity Freedom tech is close to 2 decades old. Even then, it's unacceptable that they're capped at 60 kph despite over 6 years of testing.
 
Last edited:
Bike lanes are still allowed, and if the tendering/contracting was done for Eglinton TOday before Bill 212 passed then it can still be done without asking the province for permission.
Ah. I mean to be fair this project was contracted under Wynne in 2015 so it predates him. Let's just hope Dougie doesn't drive down Eglinton one day....
 
There's a difference between negativity and avoiding complacency.

I am delighted by the opening and what it means for getting around the city.

But, the reality is, this line has the potential to be mediocre if we accept it as it stands, but excellent if we insist on fixing things..

The reality is, the various organizations and personalities involved will only rise to excellence if they are pushed, hard. So it's imperative that we monitor the areas where we know there are potential gaps, and keep the focus on improving on these.

Pointing out those very real gaps is the first step in correcting them. It's only negativity if one declares that they will never be solvable.

The deficiencies in Line 5 are largely solvable. Let's do our part to keep the pressure on towards that. If that means some harsh posts on this forum that dwell on those fixable deficiencies. I'm good with that.

- Paul
 
Last edited:
The party is only just getting started...
As per the TTC CEO, there is no party:

 

Back
Top