News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6K     0 

1752771841203.png


The above image is the current location where the 164 CASTLEFIELD bus will go. The below image shows where the 164 CASTLEFIELD bus could be when Line 5 opens in September the fall. The KEELESDALE STATION is fenced off, but couldn't the TTC make use of the loop NOW, today and run the 164 CASTLEFIELD bus. Use the KEELESDALE STATION bus bay and let passengers walk to the bus stops at Keele & Eglinton. They are likely doing "test" runs of bus routes to try out the route currently. So why not actually use the bus stops along the route?

1752771957647.png
 
View attachment 666699

The above image is the current location where the 164 CASTLEFIELD bus will go. The below image shows where the 164 CASTLEFIELD bus could be when Line 5 opens in September the fall. The KEELESDALE STATION is fenced off, but couldn't the TTC make use of the loop NOW, today and run the 164 CASTLEFIELD bus. Use the KEELESDALE STATION bus bay and let passengers walk to the bus stops at Keele & Eglinton. They are likely doing "test" runs of bus routes to try out the route currently. So why not actually use the bus stops along the route?

View attachment 666701

I assume it's some legal reason, that Metrolinx has to hand over the line as a whole to the TTC and not it parts.
 
I would assume the concern is more so the possibility of lawsuits, rather than PR issues. North Americans love to blame anyone but themselves when they get injured or inconvenienced due to their own stupidity.
I suspect it's not lawsuits, so much as insurance. If an insurance company says, "we won't cover you if you do that", then you don't do that.
 
So, what would prevent a decision to operate say during rush hours only? Continue testing in non revenue hours ?

- Paul
 
So, what would prevent a decision to operate say during rush hours only? Continue testing in non revenue hours ?
That feels like the wrong question to me. The decision to move from test to production in a rational system would be based on whether all critical and high priority defects have been resolved. If something is not fit for production that should mean it is too risky to be released to the public, and letting the public use it in rush hour would be even worse than letting them use it during lower volume periods which would itself also be bad.

One thing that creates confusion for us in this case is the lead time that the TTC apparently needs after the handover before opening. If there are things that have to be fixed before the handover can happen and can't be fixed after the handover and before opening then I think the question I would have is whether that is a real risk or just a consequence of contracts and procedures and so on.
 
I wonder who owns the TTC ICL.
Google sez: "TTC Insurance Company Limited (TTCICL), a subsidiary of Toronto Coach Terminal Inc., which is ultimately owned by the TTC"
Which isn't surprising. I know it sounds odd that they pay dividends to themselves, and then pay claims back to themselves (or make excuses to themselves for not paying out to themselves!), but that's often how insurance works in industry.
 

Back
Top