The maximum theoretical capacity with the current 2 car trains is about 5,500 pphpd, and the maximum possible operable service is something like 7,600. These are the numbers used for the service levels. The idea of being able to reliably stuff 200, let alone 250, people into one LRV and operate normally is just not compatible with the reality.Apologies, but I'm trying to understand why you think the capacity is not sufficient with the current 2 vehicle trains.
Line 5 capacity models clearly state that the highest capacity required is around 5,500 pphpd at 2031. There isn't any reason to suspect that this number is incorrect. 5,500 is also almost triple what the current 34 bus carries on Eglinton. In any case theoretical maximum capacity with the current 2 car trains is around 10,000 pphpd, almost double the expected demand.
The easiest comparison is the eastern portion of Line 2. Line 2 has a theoretical maximum of around 23,000 pphpd and is close to hitting this maximum during the morning rush. Line 2 has been operating for over 50 years with all the N-S feeder buses dropping passengers at it's station and yet not as busy as the Yonge side of Line 1. Are you under the impression that Line 5 will be similar to this shortly after opening?
You mention Canada Line being under estimated on usage, but do you have any Toronto based rapid transit projects with under estimated demand? Sheppard Subway, TYSSE, etc?
They're going to announce that they're changing the name of East Harbour Station to Don Valley Station.The location of the presser will be East Harbour Station.
Also, wouldn't Sarkaria (Transportation) be there for a Line 5 (or 6) opening announcement ? Surma is infrastructure
evidence?
When you email your press credentials for the press-kit they tell you the location of the event.
When you email your press credentials for the press-kit they tell you the location of the event.
The maximum theoretical capacity with the current 2 car trains is about 5,500 pphpd, and the maximum possible operable service is something like 7,600. These are the numbers used for the service levels. The idea of being able to reliably stuff 200, let alone 250, people into one LRV and operate normally is just not compatible with the reality.
Moreover, the ECLRT is a lot faster than the 34 and even more so the 32. Being so fast, it'll be a magnet for traffic.
The location was also announced this morning and CablePulse24
Correct. Which does, however, cause me to say, I'm not a reporter/nor do I work for a media company.
Still "hunting" through Metrolinx websites today (as of 10:30 AM), and NOTHING about handing over to the TTC from Metrolinx. Not very "transparent".Highlights from Michael Lindsay's part of press conference today:Ford: Wont open until its 100% safe
- As of today/yesterday all control was handed over to TTC - all movement on the line governed by the TTC at Hillcrest now
- Full complement of 28 trains running on the line
- All civil infrastructure is complete
- All operator driving training complete
- Big emphasis on stress testing, a lot of emphasis on avoiding another Ottawa LRT situation
- Next steps: formal trial run for 14 days, full revenue service demonstration for 30 days - then have a “bedding in period” to continue with testing (An extra period of testing recommended from the Ottawa LRT report)
Seems like a big emphasis on getting it right on opening day and avoiding an Ottawa LRT 2.0 on Eglinton




