nightstreak
Active Member
TBH I'm cringing at the thought of BMO field hosting world cup games. It's OK for our MLS purposes but it's no where near world class. Going to be embarrassing
Same. When BMO Field was announced as a World Cup host, I honestly thought they were going to rebuild the stadium.
It's definitely the most pedestrian of the North American stadiums. Still, if I were a European or South American travelling to the World Cup, I'd rather my team play in Toronto than Kansas City. While I've never attended a World Cup, I imagine the fan experience goes beyond the stadium, and includes the events around the facility, as well as the local pubs and restaurants.
Fantastic points. The fan experience is going to be far more memorable than a swanky stadium. I can imagine how TV will hide the stadium by focusing on the view of the city and the lush parklands along the waterfront as seen from above the west stands. On the ground, Exhibition Place will be filled with activations, nobody will notice the building. In the immediate area, The Bentway will be a great venue for the FIFA Fan Festival.
If I had to choose between a multi billion dollar stadium vs expanding the Bentway west to connect with BMO Field with a square where the Food Building is, I'd choose the latter because it'd leave a city legacy beyond just a stadium. But apparently we're getting neither as much of what'll be built will be disassembled after the World Cup. The World Cup experience will be great, but what a missed opportunity for leveraging it for legacy infrastructure .
Last edited: