archited
Senior Member
^ You are putting way too much faith in renderings.
I agree to a point, but back of house/loading does not have to be visible or ugly. I’m not saying this is a bad building at all, and like archited said the render might not be final. I just wish it was a little bit better. You basically win the lottery by being one of the only buildings directly connected to the park and you just ignore it? How rare it is to have a building IN the park rather than across the road.It's not being cheap and no there are not CRUs facing the park as you still need a 'back of house' for loading and logistics and all, especially for such a large building.
But if you look at the park design, it does not welcome the west in particularly well and has a 'pavilion' focussing eastward with its plaza and green space.
The better opportunities will be from the redevelopment of BPs and the lot west of it to front the park in a more meaningful way.
Any pile load tests would've been conducted in the pit, no?I'm guessing they were testing soil conditions and installed the pile at the same time.
I only counted four lights on visible from the east side of the tower on Sunday around dusk. For whatever that is worth. Overall I really can't imagine this will struggle to lease up, especially come August.
Can't wait to see the 2nd, hopefully taller, building be completed !! I like that spot where they are putting these up in and I hope more similar sized ones pop up around it !!I only counted four lights on visible from the east side of the tower on Sunday around dusk. For whatever that is worth. Overall I really can't imagine this will struggle to lease up, especially come August.