What do you think of this project?

  • I dislike it

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I dislike it a lot

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    93
It’s a massive over generalization to say nobody would use the park after dark, especially considering that the sun sets by the time a lot of people get home from work in the winter. Keep in mind that there is a lot of residential construction around the park, so even if the park isn’t drawing visitors from beyond Downtown, there are people who are and will be living right on the doorstep of the park, particularly students (considering the new housing incentive). They might use that park at all times of day for the most mundane activities like walking their dogs, going for a jog or just clearing their head (and especially if they’re students, maybe add in some weed, booze or late-night make-out sessions), and a cool ambient lighting feature would be heavily appreciated by those users. Yes, the park could have been enhanced with a fountain, but remember that it was created first and foremost as an amenity to make this area of downtown more liveable, not necessarily as a tourist draw, and it still does a fantastic job as a local park for neighbours. Most neighbourhoods in the city don’t have a basic water feature anyway, and when we get in a better budget position, there will be room by the park for a fountain. And that would be in addition to Churchill Square and the Leg, which have very popular water features already.
Some good points made but I'm certain that empirical data on park usage would confirm that the vast majority of visits to parks are made during the day. At this point its not even clear if the city will permit the park to be open after dark. Its usage could be limited to daylight hours to prevent the establishment of encampments. It would be interesting to know what the city administrators in camera discussions on the park were because there's some ambiguity on what the park's mandate actually is. To me it appears to have changed from a tradition park designed for R&R to more of an events driven festival park. I think your making a mistake believing that it's a neighborhood park because the amenities being constructed point to a festival park.
 
Attracted by the light! lol. Got it. (ps: nothing personal but the architectural firm that did the library was from Montreal too, so let's hope that you're right)
If you haven’t been to Montreal, I highly recommend visiting. In the summer, people flock to parks even those that are just open green spaces with trees and benches. After work, you’ll see people drinking wine, playing basketball, or just relaxing and smoking weed. This can last until midnight in some neighborhoods. Also, keep in mind that Montreal gets much less sunlight than here by 9 p.m., it’s already dark.

Most parks don’t really have much beyond trees, but they’re still full of life. The parks and populations are larger there, sure, but who ever said you need big attractions to draw people in? As long as the space is green and safe, SOME people will be there after dark.
 
Honestly, why don't we fence places like this with decorative fencing like in Europe and lock it up overnight.'

Nothing good happens after pint 3 or after 2am.
Good point. TBH I am concerned the location may also lead to more wear and tear (aka vandalism or damage) if there isn't some control over access especially later in the evening or at night.

Sometimes I wonder if we can have nice things downtown. I would like to believe we can, but we also have to adequately maintain and protect them.
 
Good point. TBH I am concerned the location may also lead to more wear and tear (aka vandalism or damage) if there isn't some control over access especially later in the evening or at night.

Sometimes I wonder if we can have nice things downtown. I would like to believe we can, but we also have to adequately maintain and protect them.
We could, but we don't do anything about social decay.
 
It think it's actually 11pm and 5am at least for Mill Creek Ravine, Borden Park and Paul Kane Park for some examples (according to google search)
The park hours were removed in the new public spaces bylaw; so we're now allowed to be in parks 24/7 unless the city specifically closes one.
 
The park hours were removed in the new public spaces bylaw; so we're now allowed to be in parks 24/7 unless the city specifically closes one.
Where in the new Public Spaces Bylaw does the City cede authority to individuals to use parks 24/7? Part IV of the bylaw relates to "Closed Spaces" and there is nothing in it that gives up the cities right to close public spaces.
 
Last edited:
We could, but we don't do anything about social decay.
True, all three levels of government are part of the problem and all they do is basically point fingers at each other.

The province has inadequate mental health or social support, Edmonton does minimal community policing in the area and the Federal laws on drugs are inadequate too.
 

Back
Top