What do you think of this project?

  • I dislike it

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I dislike it a lot

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    93
See anything different about these pictures? Or am I just being obtuse? Lol

IMG_2737.png

IMG_2736.png
IMG_2735.png
 
I don't think so, but could be wrong. They likely want to stabilize tower 1 before even thinking about 2.... which could be 12-16months.
Can't it stabilize during the next 3 years of construction if they were to break ground now? For Pete's sake, The Switch is already "stabilized" at 2/3rd's occupancy after 6 months.
 
It doesn't need to be "stabilized" It is not some run down building that lost it tenants, it is a new building that needs to be filled. What is it with the dumb and misleading language these days?
As mentioned, that's the industry term.

@MacLac - it's not just demand, but cost that is complicating things... not to mention relatively low rents at ~$3/ft. Calgary is getting 10-25% more for similar projects with very similar construction and ballpark land costs.
 

Back
Top