|
|
|
That's only if they follow the current TTC rules and Toronto Transportation Services traffic priorities . Currently Transportation Services prioritizes the single-occupant automobile. At present, the TTC streetcar and possible light rail network is the slowest in the world.
These are some hefty numbers that quite literally don't have any context attached to them. Whilst I'm not going defend Toronto's operational practices because you are generally right in terms of how bad it is - much of this list consists of making literal apples to oranges comparisons between systems. Why is Toronto 2024 being compared to Sydney 2011 - back when the city only had a single Tram line that mostly ran in an abandoned freight spur that featured heavy grade separation.
The trouble Toronto has is that the powers that be do not want to build any rapid transit in the city or GTA. We're are very slow in expanding Toronto rapid transit network. In fact, Toronto shrank between 2010 and 2024.
That is my point. But, as a dreamer,I do look at how things could be improved if there was the demand and the funding.
Can we not spread this unhelpful doomerism? Toronto literally has the fastest growing rail network on the continent right now in terms of what's under construction - beating out what cities like LA are doing. That's 31.4km of subway, 38.3km of tram (much of which is grade separated), we're still electrifying and improving service on many GO lines (despite how many people on this forum desperately want to convince themselves and others that we're not), and more. No, the powers at be absolutely want to build rapid transit - our issues since the new millenium has been less about whether or not we build transit, but rather disagreeing on what exactly should be built. Every major politician from all levels of government since Dalton became Premier has been interested in expanding Toronto's transit network.
For the last 20 years, you are absolutely correct. For the history of the city and it's first interurbans, that is not as true. However, there does not seem to be a desire to stop expanding the transit, so, an announcement of this line being expanded is realistically possible by 2030. We don't,and won't have China's transit growth, but, that is not really the best answer either.
The EELRT will mostly benefit people living right next to the stops. Eglinton E has a lot of bus routes the TTC plans to cut back once the LRT opens. I’m on one of them, and instead of a direct trip to Kennedy I’d have to transfer to the LRT, making the trip significantly longer. Can’t say for sure what the network will look like, but the 86 and 116 will probably get cut back. Many areas along the routes only had frequent service because they were part of the trunk the LRT’s replacing. Putting that money towards a shorter eastern subway (line 4 or somehow 5 if the gods will it) I think would do the average rider and Scarborough a lot better. UTSC, centennial, and/or west hill could make good transit hubs for eastern scarborough but only if that transit is faster than the bus
With work from home, there would be less need for the rapid transit lines to be a commuter route. However, they would become a local route for shopping, medical, recreation, entertainment, and for travelling to friends. In which case, the LRT's shorter stations would be better than a subway's far station locations.
The question posed by the above maps is how a city of 16 million people - roughly that of the entire province of Ontario - had no rapid transit before 2010.
This is the only part of your statement I am dubious of. What qualifies as expanding regional transit? The only thing alarming about GO expansion is how slowly it's coming along.
Since roughly 2000, there have been several transit lines under construction at the same time throughout that time. It is doubtful that is going to stop in the near future. The question is whether Line 4 or any LRT in the area will be done any time soon.
