CapitalSeven
Senior Member
In the 90s, the planned had morphed to a more diagonal approach after Kennedy allowing for a potential grand station where the CP and CN lines cross.
and now we can't figure out how to even get a second N-S through there never mind add a subway under the riverIn the 90s, the planned had morphed to a more diagonal approach after Kennedy allowing for a potential grand station where the CP and CN lines cross.
I asked at one of the consultations, and they said that the station placements and names are placeholders for now, and a more in-depth station analysis will help decide what stations they recommend after an alignment is determinedLast year’s consultation for the route to STC had a Brimley/Triton stop. Looks like this has already been cut?
This makes a lot of sense. I wish similar developments—like Cloverdale—were required to follow suit. Realistically, the natural western terminus for Line 4 is probably the provincial government complex at Keele and Wilson, and this would help move it in that direction.Bringing in the new map posted on Reddit from the Pride Parade for discussion here:
View attachment 662887
Seems to be the first time we are seeing what stations are being considered?
Also - The city/metrolinx should really be talking to Northcrest about protecting for a station in central Downsview. Will be much cheaper to do it with this project than after the community is built up. Hangar district would be a good spot for a future Line 4 West extension going down Wilson.
That said, we might just be looking at the future site of an NFL stadium—depending, of course, on how the next five years play out in terms of moving people in and out efficiently.I think Rogers Stadium will be long gone before Line 4 is extended to Sheppard West.
Excuse moi ?That said, we might just be looking at the future site of an NFL stadium
This makes a lot of sense. I wish similar developments—like Cloverdale—were required to follow suit. Realistically, the natural western terminus for Line 4 is probably the provincial government complex at Keele and Wilson, and this would help move it in that direction.
Personally, I think the long term vision for a western extension should be to terminate the line at the Pearson Transit Hub. See my map in the fantasy thread
Yeaaaa no.
I would much rather see it terminate at Sheppard West for the time being. Once you get west of Bathurst, the density drops and regardless Sheppard terminates at Weston Road.
The real value is heading east where everything is built up and the demand is. Even at Morningside and Sheppard there is demand for a subway while the area around Meadowvale is being built out. Markham and Sheppard has been built up for decades.
A Sheppard subway could continue west of Weston Road and the Humber River into Etobicoke. It doesn't need to follow streets, but intersect with them with stations. Maybe straight to the Pearson Transit Hub or beyond into Brampton.Yeaaaa no.
I would much rather see it terminate at Sheppard West for the time being. Once you get west of Bathurst, the density drops and regardless Sheppard terminates at Weston Road.
The real value is heading east where everything is built up and the demand is. Even at Morningside and Sheppard there is demand for a subway while the area around Meadowvale is being built out. Markham and Sheppard has been built up for decades.
A Sheppard subway could continue west of Weston Road and the Humber River into Etobicoke. It doesn't need to follow streets, but intersect with them with stations. Maybe straight to the Pearson Transit Hub or beyond into Brampton.
Yeaaaa no.
I would much rather see it terminate at Sheppard West for the time being. Once you get west of Bathurst, the density drops and regardless Sheppard terminates at Weston Road.
The real value is heading east where everything is built up and the demand is. Even at Morningside and Sheppard there is demand for a subway while the area around Meadowvale is being built out. Markham and Sheppard has been built up for decades.
And Line 4 connecting to Pearson should capture a lot of employment trips at the airport, in addition to travelers. Line 5 will also connect to Pearson, but feeder routes from the north would be captured by Line 4 if it were extended and save a considerable amount of travel time.The subway fills mostly from the connecting surface routes, not so much from the local density.
In the east, going to McCowan probably makes sense from the network perspective. I have no objections to that being the first priority.
But east of McCowan? very few feeder routes, and very light ridership to be expected. West of Dufferin, it can attract a lot more riders from the connecting routes: Keele, Jane, Weston, Islington, Albion, Kipling, Rexdale.