UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
You almost saying that like it's a good thing...Our own Constitution allows for the suspension of human rights (at least those in the Charter) and disregarding the Supreme Court if deemed necessary by the legislatures or Ottawa. Every time Canadians vote we choose the leader who may one day suspend those rights, such as Quebec’s clearly unconstitutional secularism law, Bill 21.That’s why we (and Americans, El Salvadorans, and anyone in a democracy) should always be careful who we vote for, since yes indeed human rights are put to a vote every time. Let’s hope Americans understand this when/if they next vote in Nov. 2026 in the midterms, and for the White House in Nov. 2029.
...either way, that's a very poor example of exceptions and yeah buts here...as that's one of those clauses that really shouldn't be in there in the first place. And was put there to appease Quebec, to my understanding, to sign on to said constitution at the time to which they never did. So yeah, that's pretty bad.
And that said, my point still stands.