evandyk
Senior Member
I went to Niagara Falls not that long ago and noticed it. There aren't many Arbys around any more! I've only been to Arby's once, and it must have been in 2001 or 2002.
You can spend that kind of money on pastries right here in Toronto. La Genie at College Park (in the Aura building, but facing the park) has a Paris-Brest that costs over $20.To be fair I have eaten stupidly high priced foods.
When in Hungary I usually visit Gerbaud Cukrászda (Confectionery)
They make the most delicious and high class desserts but they are also stupidly expensive. I think I paid $110 CAD for 5 pieces of cake.
In London, I visited Harrods and bought a £20 coffee in their dining hall
True, but this topic is so depressing that it makes you want to talk about pastries and sandwiches instead.Let’s get back to the topic at hand. There is plenty to discuss
True, but this topic is so depressing that it makes you want to talk about pastries and sandwiches instead.
To celebrate the defeat of Rob Ford, I treated myself to a then 22 dollar bottle of beer called Westvleteren at the Town Crier pub on John Street.To be fair I have eaten stupidly high priced foods.
When in Hungary I usually visit Gerbaud Cukrászda (Confectionery)
They make the most delicious and high class desserts but they are also stupidly expensive. I think I paid $110 CAD for 5 pieces of cake.
In London, I visited Harrods and bought a £20 coffee in their dining hall
How much revenue could tariffs generate for the U.S.?
Based on 2024 import data from Canada, Mexico, and China, the announced tariffs could boost total U.S. tariff revenues by about $300 billion, assuming demand remains unchanged. This would amount to roughly one-third of the annual cost of Trump’s proposed extension to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. However, this doesn’t take into account the fact that demand for imports from regions affected by tariffs is likely to shrink as producers attempt to source products from non-tariffed countries. This could be particularly acute for consumer-related sectors as U.S. consumers continue to be squeezed by inflation and look to reduce their demand for goods with rising prices. The ultimate boost to revenue is likely to be smaller than the $300 billion noted above, considering reduced demand and potential substitution effects.
How easy is it for the U.S. to “reshore” the most impacted sectors?
Reshoring is not as simple as it sounds. In fact, in the short term, reshoring is very difficult as significant levels of capital investment take years to plan and execute. The ability to produce goods domestically requires investment in land, factories, and machinery equipment and those decisions are challenging in a high-interest-rate environment. In the medium term, new supply chains would need to be established, adding to operating costs. In the longer term, the U.S. is facing labor supply constraints, limiting the production capacity of any new factories. The aging population is resulting in a record number of retirements. In particular, 26% of workers in manufacturing are over age 55. Added to this, the decline in immigration and notable geographic and skills mismatches in the manufacturing sector suggests reshoring activity may need to be capital intensive and could result in limited job creation.
When the Rethuglicans have their own Stasi at their disposal...
/bleh