BrenWilson
Active Member
Has he approved any *transit* project that hasn't already been studied for ages? Maybe SSE was the biggest shake up but that entire project was a failure at multiple levels.
The alignment and station locations for that follow the long-existing TTC plans - which was already approved, financed, and close to being tendered when the province took over and delayed the project from the planned 2027 opening date.Has he approved any *transit* project that hasn't already been studied for ages? Maybe SSE was the biggest shake up but that entire project was a failure at multiple levels.
Without getting overly excited; I believe Finch LRT is a useful line to build.
1. The right-of-way will speed up the travel during the peak periods, when the street is congested. And, will hopefully make the headways more even.
2. The capacity limit is higher than what can be achieved with buses (even if buses are given dedicated lanes, like YRT's VIVA); the fixed wheel advantage enables longer vehicles.
3. The cost is high, but that reflects the general inflation of construction costs. Surface light rail is still cheaper than subways. Once we get the final per-km costs of the OL, SSE, Yonge North subways, they will end up being 3-5 times greater than the per-km cost of Finch LRT.
However, I don't really like it when Finch LRT is marketed as "rapid transit"; that's misleading, and could lead to negative public sentiments once the actual travel times are known from the line's operation. I would stick to "improved, high-capacity local transit" instead of "rapid".
Or, if anyone insists on calling Finch LRT "rapid transit", then we should call TTC's express buses "rapid transit" as well, since they operate at a similar speed.
He also showed that you don't need to study something for 2 decades to build a line. Yet this city is still studying (I mean stalling) on the Eglinton East LRT.
If the City had decided to build a subway from Eglinton to downtown without interconnecting with Line 2/Greenwood, as DRL was supposed to, they would have been crucified on here for failure to link up the lines and maximise economies in work vehicles, permit branching of Line 2 etc.You're right. All you need is some hired hack to show you something shiny and new, and he'll approve it. All of the old studies be damned.
Dan
Why let science get in the way of a good rant.... and the diagonal tunnel across downtown blocks deemed an attempt to collapse buildings.
I think they are out of funds now.The Sheppard study has been moving at quite the snail pace.