Tropical
Active Member
The vibe is - I think we've been compaining a bit much.
The vibe is - I think we've been compaining a bit much.
Honestly if I didn't know where it was, I wouldn't say it's Edmonton, and that's a good thing in this case.
I don't blame you for being unable to offer a solution to the crime (and vandalism) that occurs at parks. You probably haven't had many encounters with aggressive unruly people at the Ivory Towers. Everybody at the Ivory Towers acts in an orderly business like manner and there are no intoxicated knife carrying individuals that you've had to deal with. It's my guess that if were responsible to the public for dealing with issues like the stabbings that occurred at park in Montreal, then you would consider fencing or some other means of suppressing crime.I'll just quote Chicago Tribune architecture critic Edward Keegan, writing a couple months ago:
These spaces are paid for by people and meant for them to use, and the policies that govern them shouldn't cater to those who insist on living their lives in fear. In the case of Millennium Park, the original justification was safety-related, but now that those concerns have dissipated city-wide the fences stay up because people are profiting off of them.
Well, I spend a lot of time in downtown Edmonton and surroundings, and I've spent a lot of time past sundown in Montreal parks (which, need I remind you, remain unfenced to this day—a reminder that some people don't live their lives paralyzed by fear!). Despite that, and despite having spent a lot of time in cities like Chicago and DC where Trump is sending in the National Guard on the pretext of combating crime, I haven't had many (really, any) encounters with aggressive unruly people. Guess I'm just built different!I don't blame you for being unable to offer a solution to the crime (and vandalism) that occurs at parks. You probably haven't had many encounters with aggressive unruly people at the Ivory Towers. Everybody at the Ivory Towers acts in an orderly business like manner and there are no intoxicated knife carrying individuals that you've had to deal with. It's my guess that if were responsible to the public for dealing with issues like the stabbings that occurred at park in Montreal, then you would consider fencing or some other means of suppressing crime.
Your strategy for dealing with crime that occurs at a park is based on hope and a prayer and not everybody has the luxury of using that as a strategy. The public wants solutions when crimes occur and the "he was at the wrong place at the wrong time" resolution isn't leadership and it isn't something that the public will accept from an authority. Be sure that if your strategy is used - especially in the case of a serious crime - the public will be saying that "she should have done this" or "she should have done that.. Most likely though the public will say that "she should have done something."Well, I spend a lot of time in downtown Edmonton and surroundings, and I've spent a lot of time past sundown in Montreal parks (which, need I remind you, remain unfenced to this day—a reminder that some people don't live their lives paralyzed by fear!). Despite that, and despite having spent a lot of time in cities like Chicago and DC where Trump is sending in the National Guard on the pretext of combating crime, I haven't had many (really, any) encounters with aggressive unruly people. Guess I'm just built different!
There's always a risk, no matter where I am, that someone, somewhere in my vicinity will get stabbed. (It probably won't be me, though!) This risk might be slightly higher if I'm in a "high crime" area late at night. There's a much greater risk that some idiot will run me over in their car. I choose to focus on the greater risk, and I can truly say I've never once felt any genuine fear of being attacked at night in any of these places.
That's not to say that nobody should ever feel fear—some people are more vulnerable than others. But among the strategies to deal with the potential for crime here, fencing has to be one of the stupidest. We spent $45 million on this park. It's there to be used. And if there's a big fence around the perimeter, I can guarantee it won't be.
Sorry, I just don't think it's worth it to drop everything else that makes public spaces great to drop the crime rate to exactly 0.00!Your strategy for dealing with crime that occurs at a park is based on hope and a prayer and not everybody has the luxury of using that as a strategy. When crimes do occur the public wants solutions and the "he was at the wrong place at the wrong time" resolution isn't leadership and it isn't something that the public will accept from an authority. Be sure that if your strategy is used - especially in the case of a serious crime - the public will be saying that "she should have done this" or "she should have done that.. Most likely though the public will say that "she should have done something."
You should have. You're fired.Sorry, I just don't think it's worth it to drop everything else that makes public spaces great to drop the crime rate to exactly 0.00!
Typical city workers, going for a swing instead of doing their jobsMy girlfriend saw the construction crew installing swings earlier today.