News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

More capacity by adding a Track 7 and 8 here on the south side. There should be some documents still on Metrolinx's website if you look up Union Station Rail Corridor East Project. At one point they were going to extend Track 1 all the way past Cherry but it ran into some NIMBY opposition from St Lawrence residence.
I also wonder to what extent E0 construction zone would have overlapped with Ontario Line (not announced until 2019, a year after the TPAP)
IMG_0043.jpeg
 
More capacity by adding a Track 7 and 8 here on the south side. There should be some documents still on Metrolinx's website if you look up Union Station Rail Corridor East Project. At one point they were going to extend Track 1 all the way past Cherry but it ran into some NIMBY opposition from St Lawrence residence.
It was certainly not welcomed by people who would have seen ca 20 feet of trees and bushes removed, blank walls erected and then have trains passing within a few feet of their windows. The new track would literally have been in their back yards and their NIMBYism was more justified than most.
 
More capacity by adding a Track 7 and 8 here on the south side. There should be some documents still on Metrolinx's website if you look up Union Station Rail Corridor East Project. At one point they were going to extend Track 1 all the way past Cherry but it ran into some NIMBY opposition from St Lawrence residence.
I'm confused, Track E1 extends through all the way from the shed to the Bala Sub, no? Did you mean track E0?

I also wonder to what extent E0 construction zone would have overlapped with Ontario Line (not announced until 2019, a year after the TPAP)
View attachment 669310
I just noticed there's a switch into Track 1 from the east / north. What's up with this?

Untitled.png


Also bringing forward this diagram, as I found it useful.

Untitled.png
 
It was certainly not welcomed by people who would have seen ca 20 feet of trees and bushes removed, blank walls erected and then have trains passing within a few feet of their windows. The new track would literally have been in their back yards and their NIMBYism was more justified than most.

Metrolinx made the renderings look so awful it almost seems like self sabotage to get people against it:

IMG_2780.jpeg


IMG_9097.jpeg
 
Old news.... the connections to the Bala (and Don Branch) have changed thanks to Ontario Line construction. How they are restored afterwards is anyone's guess at this point.

- Paul
Flipping through the aerials, I now see that 3 tracks used to round the bend at Corktown Common before going down to two south of the Eastern Ave Diversion (with a fourth going below to serve Corktown industry) circa 1978. It looks removed east of the signal bridge in 2005, and then never really restored I guess, partly thanks to this Track E0 plan.
 
For me the shame of losing E0 was that we were going to see Cherry Tower moved on Metrolinx’ dime and not the TTC’s…
 
Flipping through the aerials, I now see that 3 tracks used to round the bend at Corktown Common before going down to two south of the Eastern Ave Diversion (with a fourth going below to serve Corktown industry) circa 1978. It looks removed east of the signal bridge in 2005, and then never really restored I guess, partly thanks to this Track E0 plan.
That's correct. There used to be the two tracks for the Bala and Belleville Subs on the outside of the curve, and a third, service track on the inside to service the various industries in the area around the Canary Restaurant. It continued up past Queen St.

It was pulled up in the late 1980s as far as I remember, as the industries and freight sheds moved out or closed down.

Dan
 

Back
Top