81-717
Active Member
Unless they get the H6 treatment (every single one scrapped), where's the disappointment, exactly (aside from the disappointment that only the Hawkers get this treatment)?Most disappointing recently is the Adtranz M-4's, which are being replaced after a mere 28 years in service.
btw, they're not being replaced right this instant, after a quick look on wikipedia it won't happen until 2029–2031 when they'll be well in their 30s. And the fact that their replacements are due to arrive starting in 2028/2029 when the contract was only awarded last year means there's no reason why the T1 replacement can't progress at a similarly fast pace.
On the contrary, if GW could handle 6-packs there'd be less excuses to keep the T1s around longer than they should be. One of the excuses was to keep them around until Kipling yard was built, due to the limitations of GW, before they thought better of it and decided to abandon 6-packs & go back to 2-packs for the T1 replacements. Ever since then, the only excuse was the Feds dragging their heels in funding the replacements. In any case, I still don't see the need to convert the T1s from 2s to 6s even if they were to be converted to ATO.If Greenwood was able to handle six-packs there might have been merit in forming T1s into fixed trainsets and putting an equipment cabinet at either end. But it isn't, and the T1s are even further into their lifespan now, so that's that.
Last edited:




