Your going to get a lot of sensitive push back on this. But I completely agree with you.
We need harsher laws to back up operators , and punishment to deter others from playing around on the system.
This is a bad take.
Assault is already a crime.
People convicted of it, particularly the more serious versions (Assault Causing Bodily Harm and Aggravated Assault) are not 'caught and released'
Yes, people do get out on bail pending trial, generally speaking, as they should. Punishment follows conviction, not allegation.
Holding people without bail, should be, a last resort, based either on flight risk (won't show up for the trial) or clear evidence that the person is a present, on-going, and serious risk to the community.
In 2020, the most recent year for which I can find data, there were nearly 15,000 people in remand custody (pre-trial) in Ontario, on any given day. This compares to ~3,000 in the 1990s.
So we're holding a huge number of people who haven't been convicted yet.
What if they are found not guilty? A trial can easily be an 18 month (or longer) wait. Imagine having your life upended for something you didn't do? Also, spending longer in remand than you might actually receive as a sentence upon conviction.
I'm no bleeding heart. Lets protect society and punish criminal offenders. But lets be sane about it. That means applying incarceration primarily to those convicted of an offense, and generally reserving that penalty for those who are actually dangerous and/or commit the most serious offenses.
There are a host of other punishments we could choose to use (some allowed in law now, others would require amendments to same).
We can apply financial penalties, we can remove someone's right to drive, we can suspend their passport, we can order community service, we can require compulsory treatment of addictions/mental illness, we can impose curfews and apply ankle bracelets to enforce them etc etc.
5 year jail sentences are the maximum for common assault, by the way.
The Supreme Court of Canada has already thrown out most mandatory minimums because they omit any judicial discretion to consider the specifics of a crime.
It doesn't have to be a police state, because everytime you arrest someone , they'll be in jail.
Actually that is the definition of a police state. Its also a violation of international law and unconstitutional.