nfitz
Superstar
I assume for elevator issues, you'd just park a wheelchair bus at the two stations, and shuttle back and forth on demand.
View attachment 627641
The excuse for having the 149 Etobicoke-Bloor bus route is "because of delays in creating accessibility on Line 2 in the west end". What about when an elevator is out-of-service at any existing station due to maintenance, mischief, or a power failure? Shouldn't all underground electric railways (be they subway, LRT, or whatever the Ontario Line is) have parallel accessible surface routes using regular buses?
They could add articulated buses in the even of an "emergency track repair" for emergency shuttle service, to get headways every minute or three. An existing parallel service would be the start point for the shuttle, from every 20 to 30 minutes .
Obviously 100% accessibility is a good goal and will help more than just the disabled as people with strollers, heavy items etc benefit from Elevators.Older systems around the world are generally behind the TTC in terms of accessibility.
In NYC only 28% of stations are accessible.
London, UK is at 33%
![]()
Accessibility of transport in London - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Paris is at less than 10%
![]()
Paris metro worst in Western Europe for disabled access as it hosts Paralympics
Our analysis reveals how disabled access to public transport compares in the UK and across Europeinews.co.uk
Chicago is at 71%
![]()
Accessible transit - CTA
Learn about accessible transit services via bus and train from the CTA.www.transitchicago.com
Toronto is at 78.5%
****
I think if you look back, what you would see is that the task of retrofits was seen as so wildly expensive in larger, older systems, the assumption tended to be that it wasn't do-able and that para-transit such as Wheel Trans would remain the norm.
For systems engaged in new construction or with much smaller as-built infrastructure, it was seen as much more do-able to be accessible from the get-go.
Even the stations with Elevators have a piss poor design for the most part. "roll on roll off" means there are doors on both sides so users won't have to awkwardly back in or out and can just move forward at their floor.Isn't it kind of expensive to always run a parallel service? They have bus bridge plans in place already for line shutdowns, they can just activate some of the shuttles.
If there's enough local stops in-between stations that there's demand for ridership, sure, but most of the time you're going to run an empty bus up and down the street just in case.
In the case of newer lines, don't many new stations have redundant elevator by having one at each entrance?
In an even better choice you can install elevators in pairs, but afaik, Ottawa is the only city in Canada doing that in new stations along with Boston, DC and San Francisco in the US
It's mostly accessible. There's some odd missing things though - is the access from Scotiabank to the bridge over the Lakeshore (under the Gardiner) still stairs-only?Somewhat related, how accessible is PATH? I haven't been there in years, most of my GTA travels in recent years have been outside of downtown.
However I remember trying to push my daughter's stroller around the Montreal underground, and it was terrible. Of course downtown Montreal is much hillier.
But it would be disappointing to achieve all this easier access, just to be stymied as soon as you leave the station and have to turn around and go to street level all the time
Somewhat related, how accessible is PATH? I haven't been there in years, most of my GTA travels in recent years have been outside of downtown.
However I remember trying to push my daughter's stroller around the Montreal underground, and it was terrible. Of course downtown Montreal is much hillier.
But it would be disappointing to achieve all this easier access, just to be stymied as soon as you leave the station and have to turn around and go to street level all the time
Speculatively/anecdotally, a friend of mine is into rollerblading and in the warm months meets up with others downtown to skate in places like College Park or through the streets, and the odd time they've taken to rolling through the PATH (ruffling some feathers, I'm sure). Occasional stairs probably pose a fun challenge for them instead the detrimental barrier they are for others, but that they're even choosing to skate there paints me a picture of it being fairly accessible.Somewhat related, how accessible is PATH? I haven't been there in years, most of my GTA travels in recent years have been outside of downtown.
However I remember trying to push my daughter's stroller around the Montreal underground, and it was terrible. Of course downtown Montreal is much hillier.
But it would be disappointing to achieve all this easier access, just to be stymied as soon as you leave the station and have to turn around and go to street level all the time
It's mostly accessible. There's some odd missing things though - is the access from Scotiabank to the bridge over the Lakeshore (under the Gardiner) still stairs-only?
There’s a number of these in the PATH. It’s annoying and I don’t think we should accept this as accessible. Even a new build like CIBC Square has this dumb setup.When I worked in the path I found it annoying the security had to come and use a key for the wheelchair lifts between some of the staircases to go between buildings.
For a few months I had the city of Toronto and Vaughn fighting over who owns the street lights on Steeles in front of Pioneer village, in the end apparently neither city owns them so the lights will remain burnt out.I was at York University station today, and saw the "ghost" future 2nd elevator shaft at the main entrance .To me it seems an odd form of penny pinching. Like all stations on the Vaughan extension it's grand and elaborate, and it seems bizarre that a redundant elevator was where they drew the line on expenses, yet they went to the trouble of roughing it in
You would still have to pay to continuously maintain the elevator if it was installed.I was at York University station today, and saw the "ghost" future 2nd elevator shaft at the main entrance .To me it seems an odd form of penny pinching. Like all stations on the Vaughan extension it's grand and elaborate, and it seems bizarre that a redundant elevator was where they drew the line on expenses, yet they went to the trouble of roughing it in