Taken 4 March.

IMG_6368.jpeg
 
isaidso said:
Yet both are, hands down, better than those cheap turds directly to the northwest (Daniels Waterfront - City of Arts).
Click to expand...
That Daniels complex is so ironic now. It is called city of the art, but the building looks really far away from being an art, and now Artscape is gone too. They might as well just get rid of the City of the Arts name.
 
Tyrang said:
That Daniels complex is so ironic now. It is called city of the art, but the building looks really far away from being an art, and now Artscape is gone too. They might as well just get rid of the City of the Arts name.
Click to expand...
What a joke to use (nearly) the same name as Calatrava’s City of the Arts & Science in Valencia.

IMG_6579.jpeg


IMG_6145.jpeg
 
DarwinP said:
This thing is so hideous there’s zero redeeming quality here. They didn’t try at all. This would be acceptable as an infill project in Scarborough but in our central waterfront? That’s sad.
Click to expand...
The grey is horrific 😓

rdaner said:
Aesthetics aside the occupancy of over 450 units plus street-level retail is going to have a positive impact on this rapidly growing neighbourhood.
Click to expand...
Also true!
 
DarwinP said:
This thing is so hideous there’s zero redeeming quality here. They didn’t try at all. This would be acceptable as an infill project in Scarborough but in our central waterfront? That’s sad.
Click to expand...

Darwin! Enough of this fence-sitting from you, tell us what you really think.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top