From Global:


Excellent news - it's a major pain point. Now just make sure whatever they chose to do will respect the integrity of Exhibition Place. - and putting it at the north-western edge of the site makes little sense. Building a large, shallow structure directly below what will be the "Festival Plaza" seems like a no-brainer.

AoD
This is a way better move.

Having a Parking Garage in Exhibition Place means Exhibition Place will benefit from it. There will be foot traffic into Exhibition Place and that will help the year-round initiative. Also, they can also reclaim all of the open parking space for other stuff, like garden and such.

Ontario Place probably gets more usable space back, and preferably as a park land expansion.

Meanwhile, I expect CNE to complain about this soon.
 
Wow thats much bigger than i thought, is that timeline even possible then?

When are you starting work? Is any demo required?

To go down 2 levels, if the ground isn't frozen, shore, come back up, and cover? I think 8 months is workable.

So if you start by Dec' 26.........should be fine, with some contingency, depending on when in '28 Therme is set to open.

Now, if you don't start til spring '27.....your cutting it a bit close, if Therme is set to open in the first 1/2 of 2028.
 
If you wanted 1800 spots on the west parking lot here (+/-30,000m2 surface area) - you'd need to go down 2.5 levels.

Parking Lot Area.jpg
 
Interesting article in the NYT claiming Therme misrepresented itself. Hopefully this gift link will work:
A Wellness Company With False Claims, Global Aims and a Toronto Island
Not sure about Therme finance, but because the article is interesting, I started fact-checking a bit.

Maybe Therme did exaggerate their portfolio, but the article also did some selective reporting. Therme has 7 projects, 3 completed and 4 ongoing.

Out of the 3 completed ones, Therme built one themselves, collaborated one with Wund Holdings (the company that the article implied Therme replicated the brand off), and one that Wund Holdings built. Therme did acquired the one that Wund Holdings built last year.

Interesting thing is that the founder of Therme and the late founder of Wund Holdings have very close relationship, and if you take a look at their leadership group, the execs basically works and sits in both companies as VPs, Advisors, and C-Suites. So the two companies prolly do operate as one - which is made more obvious to me since Wund Holdings is registered as Non-profit. So part of this arrangement likely has to do with tax dodging.

Anyways, this NYT article kinda did not present the full story in my opinion after some digging around. It is unfortunate that I have to develop habit to look into reporting these days - a practice that I started after a journalist friend from NYT talked to me about journalism these days.
 
Out of the 3 completed ones, Therme built one themselves, collaborated one with Wund Holdings (the company that the article implied Therme replicated the brand off), and one that Wund Holdings built. Therme did acquired the one that Wund Holdings built last year.

Bucharest and what other 2?
 
Not sure about Therme finance, but because the article is interesting, I started fact-checking a bit.

Maybe Therme did exaggerate their portfolio, but the article also did some selective reporting. Therme has 7 projects, 3 completed and 4 ongoing.

Out of the 3 completed ones, Therme built one themselves, collaborated one with Wund Holdings (the company that the article implied Therme replicated the brand off), and one that Wund Holdings built. Therme did acquired the one that Wund Holdings built last year.

Interesting thing is that the founder of Therme and the late founder of Wund Holdings have very close relationship, and if you take a look at their leadership group, the execs basically works and sits in both companies as VPs, Advisors, and C-Suites. So the two companies prolly do operate as one - which is made more obvious to me since Wund Holdings is registered as Non-profit. So part of this arrangement likely has to do with tax dodging.

Anyways, this NYT article kinda did not present the full story in my opinion after some digging around. It is unfortunate that I have to develop habit to look into reporting these days - a practice that I started after a journalist friend from NYT talked to me about journalism these days.
Whenever there is rhetoric in an article I basically skim over it.
They try to present some lightly supported facts, add rhetoric like "the cut down the island in the middle of the night to hide from people".
Like cmon you cant be fooling that many people right?
 
It's interesting though that in this age of high level grifitng, I am not surprised by any of this if this was true. Not to mention, it's highly plausible that this is true...

...the only thing I can say here is that Doug wasn't the only one taken in on this.
 
Whenever there is rhetoric in an article I basically skim over it.
They try to present some lightly supported facts, add rhetoric like "the cut down the island in the middle of the night to hide from people".
Like cmon you cant be fooling that many people right?

Instead of skimming, try reading.

You do have have this consistent habit of deciding what you think before having the facts and reading only pieces that agree with your preordained view.

The substantive question in the piece is this:

Does Therme actually have the funding in place to build the Toronto project or an other?

The Times suggests that is very much in question and the evidence certainly points in that direction.
 

Back
Top