AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Isnt 1800 spots still 5 floors underground? even at the area south of BMO?
Surface Lot 1 & 2 holds approx. 1800 spots:
Assuming 75% coverage, you'd need what, 1.5 floors.
AoD
Isnt 1800 spots still 5 floors underground? even at the area south of BMO?
This is a way better move.From Global:
![]()
Ford government looking at moving Ontario Place parking, canvassing new sites | Globalnews.ca
Emails and meeting minutes obtained by Global News reveal meetings and discussions involving Toronto and Ontario considering where in Exhibition Place a new site could be built.globalnews.ca
Excellent news - it's a major pain point. Now just make sure whatever they chose to do will respect the integrity of Exhibition Place. - and putting it at the north-western edge of the site makes little sense. Building a large, shallow structure directly below what will be the "Festival Plaza" seems like a no-brainer.
AoD
Wow thats much bigger than i thought, is that timeline even possible then?Surface Lot 1 & 2 holds approx. 1800 spots:
Assuming 75% coverage, you'd need what, 1.5 floors.
AoD
Wow thats much bigger than i thought, is that timeline even possible then?
Not sure about Therme finance, but because the article is interesting, I started fact-checking a bit.Interesting article in the NYT claiming Therme misrepresented itself. Hopefully this gift link will work:
A Wellness Company With False Claims, Global Aims and a Toronto Island
Out of the 3 completed ones, Therme built one themselves, collaborated one with Wund Holdings (the company that the article implied Therme replicated the brand off), and one that Wund Holdings built. Therme did acquired the one that Wund Holdings built last year.
Whenever there is rhetoric in an article I basically skim over it.Not sure about Therme finance, but because the article is interesting, I started fact-checking a bit.
Maybe Therme did exaggerate their portfolio, but the article also did some selective reporting. Therme has 7 projects, 3 completed and 4 ongoing.
Out of the 3 completed ones, Therme built one themselves, collaborated one with Wund Holdings (the company that the article implied Therme replicated the brand off), and one that Wund Holdings built. Therme did acquired the one that Wund Holdings built last year.
Interesting thing is that the founder of Therme and the late founder of Wund Holdings have very close relationship, and if you take a look at their leadership group, the execs basically works and sits in both companies as VPs, Advisors, and C-Suites. So the two companies prolly do operate as one - which is made more obvious to me since Wund Holdings is registered as Non-profit. So part of this arrangement likely has to do with tax dodging.
Anyways, this NYT article kinda did not present the full story in my opinion after some digging around. It is unfortunate that I have to develop habit to look into reporting these days - a practice that I started after a journalist friend from NYT talked to me about journalism these days.
Frankfurt is the one Wund Holdings and Therme collaborated on, and Munich is the one that Wund Holding Built and acquired by Therme last year. I felt like the acquisition has more to do with legality.Bucharest and what other 2?
Frankfurt is the one Wund Holdings and Therme collaborated on
Whenever there is rhetoric in an article I basically skim over it.
They try to present some lightly supported facts, add rhetoric like "the cut down the island in the middle of the night to hide from people".
Like cmon you cant be fooling that many people right?