rbt
Senior Member
True.
its not the operational aspect we are worried about... its getting TO the operations that has everyone now sweating bullets. we all saw how the YUSE went....
TTC has been sharing feedback on Eglinton for several years. So much so that Crosslinx looked bad and kicked them out in May 2023 with the argument they were not party to the contract and TTC was reporting deficiencies not stipulated in their contract with Metrolinx.
I would hazard a guess that those issues were not resolved when TTC received access for training purposes and were re-reported again. I speculate that fixing them (or perhaps just arguing the fix isn't necessary) is one of the reasons TTC has taken a while to begin broader operations testing: Why spend resources testing what they already know is deficient by empirical measurement? I have zero insider knowledge; just speculation due to the informational black-hole Metrolinx leaves.
The lesson to be learned by Metrolinx/IO legal is detailed tolerance specifications need to be part of the contract and consistent across all vendor contracts (not bespoke for each one individually).
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toro...rosslinx-sue-ttc-delays-1.6844693#:~:text=The provincial transit agency has,2023 8%3A46 AM PDT
Last edited:




