reinventingthewheel
Senior Member
Yes the Crosstown moniker was dropped though I cannot speak to the latter.Did someone rename this thread or am I on drugs?
Yes the Crosstown moniker was dropped though I cannot speak to the latter.Did someone rename this thread or am I on drugs?
That name choice is particularly striking given Metrolinx' overboard insistence on avoiding confusion, considering that in other cases they used odd names where confusion would be unlikely anyways, such as the on-street stops, where people would just see them as analogous to bus or streetcar stops, even for the Hurontario LRT, which is not even in Toronto.
Would it be so bad to just embrace duplicate station names, the exercise in avoiding it is just going to get harder and harder over the years, and names will become more and more obscure historical references
New York, Chicago and Paris seem to do fine with duplicates, although Chicago's duplicates on the same line is a bridge to far in my books.
Every time I've ridden the L and they announce Cicero for the 5th time, I think of this:Would it be so bad to just embrace duplicate station names, the exercise in avoiding it is just going to get harder and harder over the years, and names will become more and more obscure historical references
New York, Chicago and Paris seem to do fine with duplicates, although Chicago's duplicates on the same line is a bridge to far in my books.
They definitely should embrace duplicate station names.Would it be so bad to just embrace duplicate station names, the exercise in avoiding it is just going to get harder and harder over the years, and names will become more and more obscure historical references
New York, Chicago and Paris seem to do fine with duplicates, although Chicago's duplicates on the same line is a bridge to far in my books.
Yes the Crosstown moniker was dropped though I cannot speak to the latter.
Strongly disagree. NYC's subway system can often be pretty confusing for those not familiar with the system or the city. Heck, even in Toronto its not uncommon to find confused tourists at Dundas Station trying to get to the airport because they confused it for Dundas West. If you need to have duplicate station names, they should at least be walking distance from each other (see: Canary Wharf in London).Would it be so bad to just embrace duplicate station names, the exercise in avoiding it is just going to get harder and harder over the years, and names will become more and more obscure historical references
New York, Chicago and Paris seem to do fine with duplicates, although Chicago's duplicates on the same line is a bridge to far in my books.
I feel like in the NYC case, it might be a bit more about the interlining than the station name where people get confusedStrongly disagree. NYC's subway system can often be pretty confusing for those not familiar with the system or the city. Heck, even in Toronto its not uncommon to find confused tourists at Dundas Station trying to get to the airport because they confused it for Dundas West. If you need to have duplicate station names, they should at least be walking distance from each other (see: Canary Wharf in London).
It's not sensible. I'm just saying Metrolinx, like OC Transpo is going through contortions to avoid name duplication, but Metrolinx will probably end up making even more zany decisions than Ottawa as it's going to hit the issue far more often.Please don't take the Ottawa example as a sensible process. For no good reason - in no way was a new name needed - they changed the station name from the neighborhood it is exactly in the centre of to a place it's not even a reasonable walk to.
Would it be so bad to just embrace duplicate station names, the exercise in avoiding it is just going to get harder and harder over the years, and names will become more and more obscure historical references
New York, Chicago and Paris seem to do fine with duplicates, although Chicago's duplicates on the same line is a bridge to far in my books.
Paris has no duplicates - they always have at least different prefixes or suffixes, or the "duplicate" stations are interchange stations.Totally agree. The whole business of obsessing over naming conventions is a bit nerdy and pedantic in my view. It leans to overthinking and unnecessary perfectionism. Very much like railcar paint schemes, locomotive horn selection, and GO cabcar spotting.
The most important things to appreciate about station naming are
a) any naming protocol is inherently likely to have contradictions and logical inconsistencies, that defy solution, so good is good enough - there is no perfect answer
b) real users especially those with regular repeat routes quickly learn and grow accustomed to odd place names that have no intuitive meaning, so arbitrary place names mostly work fine
c) real tourists don't memorize naming conventions, nor does the naming convention from the last city they visited assist them when visiting the next city - so they mostly do know how to read maps and figure things out on their phones
d) place naming decisionmaking is a gold mine for high priced consulting, usually with only marginal value added, so while irresistible to ineffective bureaucracies like ML, is something best avoided
- Paul
I agree that the naming conventions are pointless to obsess over, but I do think that duplicate station names, especially of stations which are far apart, are too confusing for infrequent users and should be avoided. IMO having suffixes or prefixes to differentiate them is good enough (e.g. in Paris: Nanterre - La Folie, Nanterre - Préfecture, Nanterre - Université, Nanterre - Ville); trying to avoid these makes it too difficult to come up with names.
Just outside Dundas West TTC station once a guy asked me "Is that the Eaton Centre?" when looking the entrance to the Crossways mini-mall across the road. He just looked more confused when I told him he needed to take the subway or 505 streetcar to downtown to get to the Eaton Centre. It didn't dawn on me until after I had walked away a couple of minutes later that he must have just gotten off the subway at the wrong 'Dundas' station, likely not knowing there are two of them.... even in Toronto its not uncommon to find confused tourists at Dundas Station trying to get to the airport because they confused it for Dundas West.
I really feel like this problem is on those people.Strongly disagree. NYC's subway system can often be pretty confusing for those not familiar with the system or the city. Heck, even in Toronto its not uncommon to find confused tourists at Dundas Station trying to get to the airport because they confused it for Dundas West. If you need to have duplicate station names, they should at least be walking distance from each other (see: Canary Wharf in London).
When you're in a place for the first time where you don't speak much of the language, it can be easier to get confused.I really feel like this problem is on those people...
Just ask someone, it takes seconds and save you an hour.




