News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

They don't shut stretches of road for months to do maintenance, they do it for full-scale track replacement.
Both the dedicated ROWs on Spadina and St. Clair were recently closed for months, and they weren't doing full-scale track replacement (or much in the way of track replacement at all, as far as I could see walking alongside).

Sooner or later this will start happening once it's all not brand-new. Though is the surface section and roadway brand-new any more?
 
Probably designed to "save money" by ignoring future expansion possibilities. Unless the Sheppard Subway is extended east AND west.
A bit harsh! This config allows for a 50% increase in capacity without any construction work at the stations. Simply add a 3rd car to the otherwise 2-car train.

Agree that the Sheppard Line should be extended east (at least to McCowan with interchange to Line 2) and west (to Woodbine GO for Line 6 and KI GO) to add E-W capacity.
 
Both the dedicated ROWs on Spadina and St. Clair were recently closed for months, and they weren't doing full-scale track replacement (or much in the way of track replacement at all, as far as I could see walking alongside).

Sooner or later this will start happening once it's all not brand-new. Though is the surface section and roadway brand-new any more?
Spadina was closed because of work at the station right? But not necessarily because the track was bad
 
Given all the issues with signal software integration with the Flexity vehicles, are we pretty much locked into the Flexity line for future orders if we want to avoid more lengthy signal related issues?
The signaling system is vehicle agnostic. It's all hardware modules that are plugged into various equipment racks in the vehicle. The integration with the train control system software is the equivalent of programming hardware driver software for your computer. It's all about programming software that tells the train control system how to interpret the inputs from the signaling system modules and what to do when it receives those inputs (e.g. how to respond to a change in signal-permitted speed and how much deceleration/acceleration force is appropriate, how to handle the changeover from ATC-enabled to ATP-only, and how to manage driver vigilance checks, etc.) All that is immensely complicated code to perfect, but a lot of the code around that is reusable in other vehicles by swapping out the vehicle-specific system calls and APIs).
 
Was on the 34 this morning going head to head with a train. A few observations:
- too many random reds on the line. From Kennedy to warden it would blitz off but the bus would catch up when it stopped
-one way or another they really need to push for signal priority on the surface sections. When I got off at don valley west stop the red came for the train 15s before the red for cars.... makes no sense.
-theyre testing voice announcements at stations. Seems like they're using the same voiceovers that are used at go train stations
-service speeds are up for the trains. They can accelerate as fast as the 34 bus flooring it.
-the aga khan station next stop displays appear to be showing actual times
-they had a crew start pressure washing the glass sidings on the ramps.... a bit early for that since they won't be opening until q4?
 
I saw some for VIVA in York Region on Highway 7 near Richmond Hill Centre. The transit left turn signal is for left turns after a red light, before a green light for the cross traffic. Saves a lot of time compared to waiting for the advance left after the cross traffic cycle.
I don't think left turns should have been allowed anywhere on the above ground part of the Crosstown. Cars turning left will delay the trains/trams and encourage the city to give signal preference to vehicular traffic in order to clear the backlog of cars waiting to turn. Instead all cars should be forced to either go straight or turn right. Just like at Kingston Rd. and Midland, where if you're EB on Kingston and want to go north onto Midland you must first turn right Kelsonia Ave. and then onto Midland so that you cross Kington Rd. directly, see map https://maps.app.goo.gl/FrNWKjMeVtuQLh2q8

If all of Eglinton east is being terraformed into a new residential district this seems the perfect time to reconfigure the cross streets so that there are no left turns.
 
Last edited:
I don't think left turns should have been allowed anywhere on the above ground part of the Crosstown. Cars turning left will delay the trains/trams and encourage the city to give signal preference to vehicular traffic. Instead all cars should be forced to either go straight or turn right. Just like at Kingston Rd. and Midland, where if you're EB on Kingston and want to go north onto Midland you must first turn right Kelsonia Ave. https://maps.app.goo.gl/FrNWKjMeVtuQLh2q8

If all of Eglinton east is being terraformed into a new residential district this seems the perfect time to reconfigure the cross streets so that there are no left turns.
I wouldn't be against closing a few more left turns (Hakimi, Sinnott, Rosemount, Ionview) and leaving only the big ones open for lefts, but Kennedy to Wynford is a long distance to ban all left turns, and that would probably cause lots of crashes and/or traffic on streets not designed to handle them.

Lefts are only part of the delay (albeit the most egregious one), and you need enough intersections for cross traffic and for pedestrians to cross. Hm. I wonder how well pedestrian only crossings would work at some of the smaller intersections.
 
but Kennedy to Wynford is a long distance to ban all left turns...
In my idea you can still turn left onto Eglinton east or westbound, and you can still go proceed NB from EB (or SB from WB) Eglinton at all the intersections between Kennedy and Wynford, only that you must turn right first onto a (intentionally designed) side road, from where you can make your left turn without disrupting cross traffic and trains on Eglinton.
 
Trains are expected to run as often as every 5 minutes to every 3 minutes and 10 seconds at the busiest times, potentially even more frequently. That is plenty of time for cross traffic and left turns to be made.

A typical traffic signal cycle length for motorists ranges from 45 to 120 seconds, but can be as short as 30 seconds or as long as 180 seconds.
 
Trains are expected to run as often as every 5 minutes to every 3 minutes and 10 seconds at the busiest times, potentially even more frequently. That is plenty of time for cross traffic and left turns to be made.

A typical traffic signal cycle length for motorists ranges from 45 to 120 seconds, but can be as short as 30 seconds or as long as 180 seconds.
Keep in mind though eastbound and westbound trains will not always arrive at the same time to an intersection.
So technically, it will be in the range of every 2.5 - 5 minutes, and every 95 seconds to 190 seconds.
 
It looks like the screens are live now, like they are showing actual train times. I drove along Eglinton recently and saw the numbers change as trains were approaching.
Without any specific knowledge, I'd think that means trial running has finally started.
 
It looks like the screens are live now, like they are showing actual train times. I drove along Eglinton recently and saw the numbers change as trains were approaching.
Screens have been live for a while now (past couple months actually). Sometimes they are accurate, other times they arent and depict times where vehicles dont actually arrive at the stop.
 

Back
Top