In terms of the travel distance from GO to TTC/subway - East Harbour will be superior (and require less changes in levels as well).

Kipling station at least has a very functional and well outfitted subway station building and the new Transit Hub isn't too bad either for the MiWay and Go buses.

Except how far you have to travel to go from the regional terminal to the subway and GO. Sure it is all sheltered - but the walk takes 5 minutes.

AoD
 
Last edited:
Please elaborate on what is so dysfunctional about the subway station part of East Harbour.

In terms of the travel distance from GO to TTC/subway - East Harbour will be superior (and require less changes in levels as well).



Except how far you have to travel to go from the regional terminal to the subway and GO. Sure it is all sheltered - but the walk takes 5 minutes.

AoD

...the point of contention here is that it doesn't look superior where it should. Not that it's impractical.

Apologies, @UtakataNoAnnex spelled out what I was implying with my post.

Kipling station is only a Mobility Hub and not being touted as a second Union Station or anything. And yet it has a sheltered TTC station with a very efficient bus terminal, a functional and well designed (though far) regional bus terminal for MiWay and GO, and a barebones GO train station (similar to many other GO stations across GTA).

The "second Union Station" should be striving for so much more than what we're getting if we're able to compare it with the likes of Kipling Station.
 
Kipling station is only a Mobility Hub and not being touted as a second Union Station or anything. And yet it has a sheltered TTC station with a very efficient bus terminal, a functional and well designed (though far) regional bus terminal for MiWay and GO, and a barebones GO train station (similar to many other GO stations across GTA).
The "second Union Station" should be striving for so much more than what we're getting if we're able to compare it with the likes of Kipling Station.

I think by this point no one will be considering East Harbour as a second Union Station of any kind, given the dramatically different land use from originally envisioned.

AoD
 
F5A15EB2-1BCC-4CA2-9B38-566AD6EC6B6A.jpeg
149E6F7A-D981-40C5-96A8-D55B6A98C3B1.jpeg
BB896C60-7D7B-4C3F-BE46-5C37EDD9119D.jpeg
 
Is there a pedestrian bridge being built connecting the Canary District?

Long story short, a pedestrian and cycling bridge was in the scope of the original project but is not part of the recent construction contract and was quietly removed from Metrolinx's website.

Metrolinx claims it is still under discussion with the City, but we have our doubts. For a fuller picture and to see how you can help, see here: https://www.cdna.to/lower_don_pedestrian_cycling_bridge
 
Long story short, a pedestrian and cycling bridge was in the scope of the original project but is not part of the recent construction contract and was quietly removed from Metrolinx's website.

Metrolinx claims it is still under discussion with the City, but we have our doubts. For a fuller picture and to see how you can help, see here: https://www.cdna.to/lower_don_pedestrian_cycling_bridge

If they are already building a new bridge for Ontario Line, is it so difficult to add space for pedestrians and cyclists with a MUP?

It's nice to hear that someone's advocating for this!
 
It's a transit "hub" that wants to serve less and less people...making this just a rail station only once they've finished whittling it down. /sigh
 
I believe the new arch bridge carrying the Ontario Line over the Don River has pedestrian access on both side.

It does not. It seems this so easily could have been built into the bridge, but this is Metrolinx.

At one point Metrolinx suggested that an alternative route for people in the Canary District to access East Harbour would be to walk up to Queen Street, across the Don Valley, and down Broadview, so we are really dealing with absurdists. Communication has been predictably bad.
 
I'm still hopeful that awful rendering is still some sort of place holder and we may see a revised design. At a Toronto Board of Trade event in June on infrastructure a representative from the East Harbour Transit Hub Alliance did a presentation on the project and quickly changed the slide that showed the recent rendering as if she didn't want to talk about it. Maybe I'm being overly optimistic here that something better is to come?
 
I'm still hopeful that awful rendering is still some sort of place holder and we may see a revised design. At a Toronto Board of Trade event in June on infrastructure a representative from the East Harbour Transit Hub Alliance did a presentation on the project and quickly changed the slide that showed the recent rendering as if she didn't want to talk about it. Maybe I'm being overly optimistic here that something better is to come?
Something better is not coming. Apologies.
 
How I wish this station had ended up like Bijlmer station in Amsterdam:



 

Attachments

  • IMG_4954.jpeg
    IMG_4954.jpeg
    336.4 KB · Views: 44
  • IMG_4955.jpeg
    IMG_4955.jpeg
    234.2 KB · Views: 29

Back
Top