From today:

IMG_1984.jpg
IMG_1985.jpg
 
This might be harsh but.. this building is an affront and a disgrace to the eyes, such an ugly building for that part of the skyline. I had said previously that it’ll have a similar “chunkiness but endearing” factor as the Rockefeller centre did but I take it back after looking at more renderings and future depictions of the skyline, this thing is gonna just look out of place and lord knows Concord is gonna ruin this chonker even more with the cladding.. 🥀
 
This might be harsh but.. this building is an affront and a disgrace to the eyes, such an ugly building for that part of the skyline. I had said previously that it’ll have a similar “chunkiness but endearing” factor as the Rockefeller centre did but I take it back after looking at more renderings and future depictions of the skyline, this thing is gonna just look out of place and lord knows Concord is gonna ruin this chonker even more with the cladding.. 🥀
Rockefeller is a 1930s objet d'art compared to this, which, judging by the "official" rendering, is a monstrously wide, 300m tall piece of broken glass (Architects, please retire the "shards of glass" aesthetic!). I don't think it will be endearing. That's why I expressed a fondness for the render, still seen above - but alleged by someone here more knowledgeable than me to have been an apocryphal one - with the white accents all over the building. They would have given the exterior much-needed texture and differentiation. Hopefully it doesn't end up completely ghastly, because at it's size, it will be impossible to ignore.
 
This is like building a 2nd Aura...the same impact on the neighbourhood and visually, but, somehow this will be worse than Aura.
It's wider and taller than Aura, so its impact will be even more pronounced. I'm sure in less than 3 years after completion it will resemble Aura in terms of the broken lighting.
 

Back
Top