News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

Maple Travel Plaza off of the 400 Southbound lanes, North of Teston Road. Now shutdown and being demolished, in its place will be a modernized Enroute.


View attachment 655592

The King City ONRoute will be demolished and presumably replaced when the 413 interchange starts construction.

PS: It's kind of funny that this one was called "Maple" when the area west of the 400 will likely be thought of as Woodbridge when development reaches here.
 
Last edited:
Maple Travel Plaza off of the 400 Southbound lanes, North of Teston Road. Now shutdown and being demolished, in its place will be a modernized Enroute.


View attachment 655592
Kind of find it amusing how they have this and the King City ONroutes so close to the city. If you look at the ones on 401, they don’t start popping up again until when you’re well outside of the core GTA. To the west its the Cambridge ones parallel of each other and to the east its the Newcastle/Port Hope ONRoutes, and on both sides they are over an hour and 85+ km out from Toronto.

The same goes for the one in Barrie too, its a well sized city that already has a ton of amenities nearly every exit over there so is this location really necessary in comparison to areas that are more rural/remote and could benefit from having one?
 
Last edited:
Kind of find it amusing how they have this and the King City ONroutes so close to the city. If you look at the ones on 401, they don’t start popping up again when you’re well outside of the core GTA. To the west its the Cambridge ones parallel of each other and to the east its the Newcastle/Port Hope ONRoutes, and on both sides they are over an hour and 85+ km out from Toronto.

The same goes for the one in Barrie too, its a well sized city that already has a ton of amenities nearly every exit over there so is this location really necessary in comparison to areas that are more rural/remote and could benefit from having one?
There used to be one in Mississauga between Winston Churchill and Mississauga Rd where an OPP building occupies the site now. You can see it on Google maps. Back in the days this was all farmland in the middle of nowhere.

I think they need to expand ONRoutes to the 402, 416 and 417. At least have some stops with a restroom and vending machines.
 
The same goes for the one in Barrie too, its a well sized city that already has a ton of amenities nearly every exit over there so is this location really necessary in comparison to areas that are more rural/remote and could benefit from having one?
The Barrie one is kind of silly, especially when I occasionally take the 400 to get from Mapleview to Essa and pass it by. I presume its reason for existence is so there are an equal number on each side of the highway, and the corresponding one in Innisfil is still a largely rural area.

When the GO station is built and Innisfil starts really growing to the point of needing a 6th Line interchange, it may make more sense to look at winding those OnRoutes down.

The issue with placing new OnRoutes is that they usually have a non-expressway connection from behind, so employees can access it from the local street network, and that only really appears on both sides of the 400 in Simcoe County and southward. Beyond there, the towns served by the 400 are essentially rest stop equivalents if you need more than a stretch break. You could maybe shift the Innisfil/Barrie ones slightly north to Coldwater/Waubaushene??

The 402 may benefit from a pair outside Watford, too.
 
The issue with placing new OnRoutes is that they usually have a non-expressway connection from behind, so employees can access it from the local street network, and that only really appears on both sides of the 400 in Simcoe County and southward. Beyond there, the towns served by the 400 are essentially rest stop equivalents if you need more than a stretch break. You could maybe shift the Innisfil/Barrie ones slightly north to Coldwater/Waubaushene??

The 402 may benefit from a pair outside Watford, too.
Like you said, there must be employees accessing them which means they need to hire locals to staff them. It might be more difficult to get employ enough workers, especially when people from Barrie can't just take a bus there. A Parry Sound should be much easier. Between that is pretty rural but they can always build a simple rest stop like how other countries/states have better facilities.
 
The alternative to highway service centres is the US-style 'vehicle malls' you see at interchanges in many parts of the US. Private industry gobbles up the off-highway land around intersections to grab their slice of the pie, turning the areas around the interchanges into vast wastelands. The be a properly designed highway service centre you need proper parking for transports, something a private business might not be keen on doing. All of the traffic you see at a service centre ends up going onto municipal roads.

Highway 400 and Mapleview is already as mess. Do we want to to do that to Essa or Dunlop, particularly given the proposed development for those areas?

With lower volumes, you can get away with a 'service centre lite' like south of Parry Sound at Sequin Trail Rd. It's parking lot is barely suitable for large trucks.

Breezewood PA:

1749733822012.png
 
There used to be one in Mississauga between Winston Churchill and Mississauga Rd where an OPP building occupies the site now. You can see it on Google maps. Back in the days this was all farmland in the middle of nowhere.

I think they need to expand ONRoutes to the 402, 416 and 417. At least have some stops with a restroom and vending machines.
I agree re ONRoute expansion. The truck stops located on the 402 near Wyoming should be converted to full rest stops. I believe the 403 could also benefit from having stops either east or west of Brantford. As for the 416 and 417, having them situated near Kemptville, Casselman, and Renfrew (along the future 417 extension to the area) are the ideal locations in my opinion. Further expansion north to Sudbury is also probably a good idea too once the twinning/extension of 400 is complete.

It may seem somewhat redundant to have locations on the edge of the GTA urban periphery or near urban areas (like near Vaughan or Barrie), but I have always been under the impression that they are there so people can stop before or after going through the heavy traffic that impacts those sections of the 400 and 401. It’s generally a lot more convenient to pull into a rest stop instead of pulling off into the city proper and finding somewhere to stop, especially if you aren’t as familiar with the area or if you are on a long road trip.
 
I agree re ONRoute expansion. The truck stops located on the 402 near Wyoming should be converted to full rest stops. I believe the 403 could also benefit from having stops either east or west of Brantford. As for the 416 and 417, having them situated near Kemptville, Casselman, and Renfrew (along the future 417 extension to the area) are the ideal locations in my opinion. Further expansion north to Sudbury is also probably a good idea too once the twinning/extension of 400 is complete.

It may seem somewhat redundant to have locations on the edge of the GTA urban periphery or near urban areas (like near Vaughan or Barrie), but I have always been under the impression that they are there so people can stop before or after going through the heavy traffic that impacts those sections of the 400 and 401. It’s generally a lot more convenient to pull into a rest stop instead of pulling off into the city proper and finding somewhere to stop, especially if you aren’t as familiar with the area or if you are on a long road trip.

For the 402- there are facilities at the Blue Water Bridge near the currency exchange and duty free if you gotta go. Duty free also has food.

"Impeccable public washrooms"

---

The 403 has a convenient food court style building at the Garden Ave exit in eastern Brantford just off the highway. Inside there's a Tims, Wendys, taco bell, kfc, and some other choices IIRC-
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.1695663,-80.2152628,3a,48.9y,163.98h,87.38t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sD5VNJg12nj43N6-XpTQs1Q!2e0!6shttps://streetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com/v1/thumbnail?cb_client=maps_sv.tactile&w=900&h=600&pitch=2.6215909361458074&panoid=D5VNJg12nj43N6-XpTQs1Q&yaw=163.97752521448652!7i16384!8i8192!5m1!1e1?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDYwOS4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw==

There's 2 similar style buildings on the QEW too just off the highway



---

These businesses along with others would fight the government tooth and nail if they developed more ONroutes. They'd lose a ton of their business.
 
Last edited:
The alternative to highway service centres is the US-style 'vehicle malls' you see at interchanges in many parts of the US. Private industry gobbles up the off-highway land around intersections to grab their slice of the pie, turning the areas around the interchanges into vast wastelands. The be a properly designed highway service centre you need proper parking for transports, something a private business might not be keen on doing. All of the traffic you see at a service centre ends up going onto municipal roads.

Highway 400 and Mapleview is already as mess. Do we want to to do that to Essa or Dunlop, particularly given the proposed development for those areas?

With lower volumes, you can get away with a 'service centre lite' like south of Parry Sound at Sequin Trail Rd. It's parking lot is barely suitable for large trucks.

Breezewood PA:

View attachment 658162
This kind of development is not going to happen to Essa; the city of Barrie is fully intending to transition that street into a mid-rise corridor and the land is worth too much to do otherwise. Getting rid of the Barrie OnRoute won't push that development onto Essa and Dunlop, it will push it onto McKay Road to the south.

The other way of thinking is that the OnRoutes didn't stop Mapleview from building out how it did; the main purpose is to avoid the local traffic, not to avoid auto-centric development at interchanges (which happens at every interchange regardless). The Barrie one needs to should probably be shut down eventually, if only because the ramp spacing is dangerously close from both Mapleview and Essa.

Breezewood is a poor example as well because it's one of the few places in the USA where interstate traffic is forced onto an arterial road at a terminus, and needs to maneuver through 200m of service road to get back on the Interstate system. It's also dying; Pennsylvania has bought up enough properties in the area that they are planning a direct connection, and some of the properties on this strip have been abandoned in recent years.
 
This kind of development is not going to happen to Essa; the city of Barrie is fully intending to transition that street into a mid-rise corridor and the land is worth too much to do otherwise. Getting rid of the Barrie OnRoute won't push that development onto Essa and Dunlop, it will push it onto McKay Road to the south.

The other way of thinking is that the OnRoutes didn't stop Mapleview from building out how it did; the main purpose is to avoid the local traffic, not to avoid auto-centric development at interchanges (which happens at every interchange regardless). The Barrie one needs to should probably be shut down eventually, if only because the ramp spacing is dangerously close from both Mapleview and Essa.

Breezewood is a poor example as well because it's one of the few places in the USA where interstate traffic is forced onto an arterial road at a terminus, and needs to maneuver through 200m of service road to get back on the Interstate system. It's also dying; Pennsylvania has bought up enough properties in the area that they are planning a direct connection, and some of the properties on this strip have been abandoned in recent years.
The point I was trying to make was that if services aren't available on the highway, motorists will, by default, have to go off the highway and in most urban areas, like Barrie, that can be problem. Hwy 401 and N. Front St./CR62 in Belleville is similar. I'll leave where they should go to the traffic engineers, but am a little surprised a NB centre didn't go in near the SB Innisfil one, simply because it seems they ten to have them in pairs.

Although still disruptive, passenger vehicle traffic moving into municipal roads is at least do-able. Not so much for trucks. They need more space than most off-highway facilities are able to provide. We have a dearth of actual 'truck stops' in southern Ontario so the service centres is about the best they can do.

I realize Breezewood was an extreme example, but gas station/restaurant/motel clusters one all four quadrants of highway interchanges are pretty common in the US, just not the that extreme. It arose out of an anomaly in federal highway funding rules. They have since found a work-around. Also, travel patterns have changed in the same way we see small derelict motels dotted along many highways.

BTW, the plans for a Mckay Rd. interchange have been pushed off until the mid-2030s according to the City of Barrie.
 
Norwich Street/Highway 59 at Woodstock is a very American scene – and there are nearby service centres.

I generally avoid OnRoutes except for a washroom break. The prices are higher for both food and gas than off the highway. You’re also limited to the same fast food brands. It’s just a matter of knowing where you want to get off the highway that’s not going difficult to get back on. (Which means definitely not Mapleview or Bayfield in Barrie).
 
Norwich Street/Highway 59 at Woodstock is a very American scene – and there are nearby service centres.

I generally avoid OnRoutes except for a washroom break. The prices are higher for both food and gas than off the highway. You’re also limited to the same fast food brands. It’s just a matter of knowing where you want to get off the highway that’s not going difficult to get back on. (Which means definitely not Mapleview or Bayfield in Barrie).
yes, I find the lines in OnRoutes especially during busy times can kill any time savings of getting off the highway anyway. The one benefit is multiple options for groups with different tastes.

Personally my go-to stop on the 400 is the new A&W /Petro Canada at Highway 89. It's never busy and is a quick hop off the highway. That is, if I can't hold off till Webers..

Canada has been seeing an increase in "american style" interchange exits on several core freeways in the last 2 decades. A lot more new roadside hotels, trucks stops, and restaurants than what was around 20 years ago. As of this year we will have a contiguous freeway network across 4 provinces too, which helps build that kind of trip culture.
 
We may not have Buck-ees or Wawa here, but a Pilot/Flying J is always a nice sight if you're in need of a break. Clean washrooms, good coffee, usually cheaper gas. Quality truck stops that cater to everyone.

Coming back from Windsor/USA, the Tilbury location is almost always a stop for me vs the Onroutes here (nicknamed the Tilbury Toilets as these stops really sucked before they were rebuilt). Getting off and back on the 401 is a breeze here. 1 min delay from the ramp.
 
I generally avoid OnRoutes except for a washroom break. The prices are higher for both food and gas than off the highway. You’re also limited to the same fast food brands. It’s just a matter of knowing where you want to get off the highway that’s not going difficult to get back on. (Which means definitely not Mapleview or Bayfield in Barrie).
Same. The vendors are all pretty similar because they are government contract sites. The one thing I like about how Quebec does it, at least on some of their ARs, is they have simple 'rest areas' every so often. Not wide open, hot, paved commercial sites, just parking, grass and trees, where you can actually, you know, rest. Some might have a coffee or snack truck, likely under contract, but I found them quite re-charging. Ontario does have some decent rest areas but none of them are along 400-series routes, and the few service centres that have an actual picnic area are kinda grim.

The "knowing where you want to go" always surprised me. I did a post-retirement, part-time gig driving for the airport shuttle out of Barrie and on weekends, and never went near Hwy 400, and often wondered why the people who do the drive every weekend would sit in stop-and-go traffic year after year.

That is, if I can't hold off till Webers.
Quite frankly, I've never understood the attraction of Weber's, at least not in the past 20-odd years. In the beginning, their burgers were good but now they are little different that most other fast food joints (particularly the buns). They do move people through like an assembly line, but I certainly wouldn't be sanding outside in the rain waiting for one. The one thing in their favour is most ma-and-pa, not-chain options either north or south of their, have gone.
 

Back
Top