News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

Did they know? Or did they naively believe the lies that it would be violent criminals only? Or did they think it would just happen to someone else? Or did they vote to
lower the price of eggs and not worry so ,icy about what was going to happen to the brown people? View attachment 661995
A lot of leopard face eating going on...
 
As well, living in another country like the US isn't like baseball. Just because you've touched the base doesn't make you safe. If you are in the country illegally (snuck in, violated/overstayed terms of legal entry, etc.) you are, in fact, a criminal.
Viewing people here as criminal is part of the problem here. It sets black and white narrative of an "us vs. them" mentality that only serves to escalate hate and injustices...instead we should look at them as human first bound to make mistakes and poor choices. So what we should be saying is, "You are here illegally unfortunately. But don't fret, here's what you need to do to stay." I know, radical stuff this is...

...but I am also careful to say this, because by all definitions the sitting President is in fact a convicted criminal...and one so without any seemingly any irony and with impunity here. I guess he's the right kinda criminal. /s
 
Last edited:
Too many people didn't understand the signals that Trump and the Project 25 crowd want to deport anyone they don't like. The criteria is broad and undefined, criminal record, illegal presence, funny looking, being a Democrat, and on and on. This is an administration that claimed 'they' were eating all the domestic pets and questions the natural-born provision of their Constitution based on the background of the parents.

As well, living in another country like the US isn't like baseball. Just because you've touched the base doesn't make you safe. If you are in the country illegally (snuck in, violated/overstayed terms of legal entry, etc.) you are, in fact, a criminal.

Honestly, as someone whose family immigrated to Canada and who has family who immigrated to the US, I find the American debate a bit strange. Amongst a certain segment there almost seems to be an entitlement to residency in the US. And naturally there's a ton of pushback that comes with this. We see this in Canada now, even on legal immigration as competition for jobs, housing and social services increases. Racism and racial anxiety makes that worse.

Politically, it was always a bad idea for Democrats to go soft on immigration. It's great for their coalition. But it doesn't help with the median voter at all. Will be interesting to see our own politics around this shortly, when a whole bunch of students refuse to return to their country of origin (mostly India).
 

I have no social media on my devices, nor any bookmarks/saved passwords to social media on my browsers. I'd recommend the same to anyone traveling to the USA or outside of Canada.

I'm looking forward to Canada getting a lot more quality foreign students because of dumb rules like this. I applaud Americans shooting themselves in the foot.
 
So what we should be saying is, "You are here illegally unfortunately. But don't fret, here's what you need to do to stay." I know, radical stuff this is...
And considering that much of the US economy and food supply would collapse without these people, a path to legal status would make sense. We've already seen 🍊🌮 begin to waver as his billionaire buds in hotels and agriculture complain about lost labour and profits.
 
"You are here illegally unfortunately. But don't fret, here's what you need to do to stay."

This is the part that is contentious. Especially among working class voters who see this lot as competition for employment and housing specifically.

And to anybody who thinks we're immune to this, go on to any Canadian forum dealing with real estate.
 
I'm looking forward to Canada getting a lot more quality foreign students because of dumb rules like this. I applaud Americans shooting themselves in the foot.
My only request is that we limit foreign student approvals in any year to no more than 5% from any one country. There's a lot more to this world than China and India. Let's open ourselves up to more students from elsewhere. Africa, for example is the only continent with a positive birth rate, a good place to start.
 
And considering that much of the US economy and food supply would collapse without these people, a path to legal status would make sense. We've already seen 🍊🌮 begin to waver as his billionaire buds in hotels and agriculture complain about lost labour and profits.

They should. But they won't. Making these workers legal would drastically raise their wages.
 
My only request is that we limit foreign student approvals in any year to no more than 5% from any one country. There's a lot more to this world than China and India. Let's open ourselves up to more students from elsewhere.

Why are you all of a sudden concerned where people come from? Sounds very American.

More seriously, immigration is supply and demand. You won't get a ton of people from Europe willing to come here. And limiting 40% of the world's population to 10% of student visa quota is a surefire way to get a mediocre foreign student cohort. If argue for a limits that are the same as the proportion of global population.
 
My only request is that we limit foreign student approvals in any year to no more than 5% from any one country. There's a lot more to this world than China and India. Let's open ourselves up to more students from elsewhere. Africa, for example is the only continent with a positive birth rate, a good place to start.
You realize that limiting the two largest supplies for a specific group is counter to the idea of attracting the best foreign talent, right?

Are you able to discern international students from India versus ones from Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc.?
Are you able to discern international students from China versus ethnically Chinese students from Malaysia, Singapore, etc.?

This sort of question ("how do you know someone is a TFW?") went unanswered in the Dollarama thread. Are you able to discern an Indian-Canadian versus a foreign-Indian? Or is this just sort of a broad stroke sort of thing, similar to what ICE is doing in the US?
 
Why are you all of a sudden concerned where people come from? Sounds very American.
Cast a wide net to seek out the best candidates from anywhere. Our own government recently advised DFAIT to look beyond India for international students. I assume this isn't based on racism, but more a wish to look more globally for the best candidates.
Are you able to discern international students from India versus ones from Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc.? Are you able to discern international students from China versus ethnically Chinese students from Malaysia, Singapore, etc.?
Why does what they look like matter to you? I'm suggesting that Canada cast a wide net for the best international students, rather than just focusing on India and China. As I said above, let's look at Africa where there are millions of young people, and yes let's also look to Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Singapore, why would you not?
Or is this just sort of a broad stroke sort of thing, similar to what ICE is doing in the US?
Canada can definitely benefit from what ICE is doing, and we should invite qualified international students in the USA to transfer to Canada.
 
Last edited:
This is the part that is contentious. Especially among working class voters who see this lot as competition for employment and housing specifically.

And to anybody who thinks we're immune to this, go on to any Canadian forum dealing with real estate.
One of the points on that Great Replacement Theory bingo card is to assume/propagate that immigrants are stealing jobs from everyone else. It never considers much of the working class is mostly made of immigrants, that much of the immigrants take on jobs the more established don't really want...or the very real problem of unemployment, competition and low wages are the folks up the top making all the self-interested decisions for them. And to put that mildly.

...and in the US, that echo chamber is dialed up to the nines currently. /bleh
 
You realize that limiting the two largest supplies for a specific group is counter to the idea of attracting the best foreign talent, right?

To be fair, the current system are largely attracting people with money (and not even that much), not people with brains, who simply want to buy their way in, with BS programs designed to get them residency. We aren't seeing a lot of these folks line up for construction trades programs in college or STEM PhDs.
 

Back
Top