ntt1
Active Member
Well, this certainly doesn't help certain perceptions around the election. Yeesh.
Ohhh boy.
That said, it looks like a lot of the votes actually came from Roger Kotch so I'm curious if the results were misentered. Not that it makes anything better because it draws a lot more into question.
This is a very Trumpian response btw.It's not shocking that there are a lot of people who want to make this A Thing, but it's not A Thing, at least if the Western Standard article is all we have to go on. By the standard they use, I'd bet that most of the councillors should've recused themselves.
You're ethically flexible. I'm not the same.if she’s not voting on that funding and where it is going, and if she’s not actively working for the NPO, what’s the conflict? Also, we’re talking about dollars in the low 5 figures…. This isn’t some massive conspiracy. The city has grants for these sorts of initiatives all the time.
Most councillors stand to gain/lose more on their primary residences through zoning decisions. And those gains aren’t subject to income tax like a grant to a NPO that Ashley’s husband might take a small salary from…
Show us a decision that she took part in that furthered her or her spouse’s interests.You're ethically flexible. I'm not the same.
I'll let you do the digging friend. People warn me not to post here. So I'm quiet now.Show us a decision that she took part in that furthered her or her spouse’s interests.
I’ve looked. I’ve read the Western Standard article. The article itself admits they did not find any examples of her voting while in a conflict of interest. They made a vague allegation that voting on the full zoning bylaw renewal could have been seen as furthering YEGarden Suites, which is such a stretch.I'll let you do the digging friend. People warn me not to post here. So I'm quiet now.
However, people need to not blindly follow their party, right or left, which clearly happens here.
I think we need to think about Hanlon's razor here: Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. My guess is that someone put all the votes for Parmar at one polling station in the Kotch pile by accident.Place your bets early. I think that either Kotch or Friesen tried to rig the election by having insiders volunteer to become tabulators, then "erroneously" put in some of Thu's votes for Kotch.
I have no evidence, but a recount only moves Kotch (who wasn't well liked in the ward) votes to Thu, who was largely considered the frontrunner? Here's hoping some sort of interference gets proven, and we stop using this stupid manual counting mechanism.
Place your bets early. I think that either Kotch or Friesen tried to rig the election by having insiders volunteer to become tabulators, then "erroneously" put in some of Thu's votes for Kotch.
I have no evidence, but a recount only moves Kotch (who wasn't well liked in the ward) votes to Thu, who was largely considered the frontrunner? Here's hoping some sort of interference gets proven, and we stop using this stupid manual counting mechanism.




