News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

but I do not think I have ever seen any at King/Church. I assume that when the new expanded group is in place they will be seen more often and in more places.
Not sure where the cops stake out but I’ve seen cars pulled over on either side beyond the intersection, east and west.

Impressively, Google and Apple wayfinding will still direct you straight through sometimes.
 
IMG_1968.jpeg


Image source

A reminder of what we could have on King for relatively low cost. And yet we choose to simply not unlock tons of east-west transit capacity.

Maybe it’s time for an advocacy campaign?

LRT for King
 
View attachment 626762

Image source

A reminder of what we could have on King for relatively low cost. And yet we choose to simply not unlock tons of east-west transit capacity.

Maybe it’s time for an advocacy campaign?

LRT for King
In terms of urban design, yes, the Sydney Light Rail is phenomenal -- as are a lot of public-space projects in Australia.

As transit, however, it's almost useless. Much, much faster to take a bus on one of the parallel streets. I believe the average speed through the central stretch is around 10 km/h.
 
No, it's not a red light infraction if you enter before the light is red and get stuck there, even if it was obvious you wouldn't clear the intersection. It's a small bylaw infraction.
It is a red light infraction at the intersections where they installed separate bike/transit heads and leave the vehicle signals red all day
 
Say, if they put the new platforms that high, that close to the streetcar tracks, that would help discourage some of the driving idiots. Big solid pieces of stone that would leave scratches. Perhaps one down the centre of the road too.

Cobblestones might help too.
 
View attachment 626762

Image source

A reminder of what we could have on King for relatively low cost. And yet we choose to simply not unlock tons of east-west transit capacity.

Maybe it’s time for an advocacy campaign?

LRT for King
The final design of King Street is still not finalised as it will be 'rebuilt' after the City and TTC install new watermain and TTC tracks - the projects on King are (slowly) working eastwards towards Spadina. Not saying the final design will be like the above but it will, supposedly, be better than the current 'interim condition'
 
In terms of urban design, yes, the Sydney Light Rail is phenomenal -- as are a lot of public-space projects in Australia.

As transit, however, it's almost useless. Much, much faster to take a bus on one of the parallel streets. I believe the average speed through the central stretch is around 10 km/h.

Seemed faster than our streetcars when I was there, especially through intersections but definitely not as fast as trams in Berlin or Paris.

I’ll take infrastructure over operational efficiency any day though. Once you have the infrastructure, operations can be improved at any point.

There is much more friction towards building infrastructure and I think that is where political and real capital should be prioritized.
 
The final design of King Street is still not finalised as it will be 'rebuilt' after the City and TTC install new watermain and TTC tracks - the projects on King are (slowly) working eastwards towards Spadina. Not saying the final design will be like the above but it will, supposedly, be better than the current 'interim condition'

IMG_1969.jpeg
 
Once you have the infrastructure, operations can be improved at any point.
I disagree. While theoretically true, the institutional inertia of an organization like the TTC pretty much guarantees that once something is the case, it is set in stone. I wouldn't hope to see any elimination of their ridiculous safety rules, either. If we put a ball and chain around our ankles in the form of a painfully slow transit mall, I can guarantee you there would be no fixing it.
 
I disagree. While theoretically true, the institutional inertia of an organization like the TTC pretty much guarantees that once something is the case, it is set in stone. I wouldn't hope to see any elimination of their ridiculous safety rules, either. If we put a ball and chain around our ankles in the form of a painfully slow transit mall, I can guarantee you there would be no fixing it.
@goodcitywhenfinished said that operations CAN be improved - which is true. However, you are unfortunately right that due to the TTC 'management' this is not likely to actually happen.
 
@goodcitywhenfinished said that operations CAN be improved - which is true. However, you are unfortunately right that due to the TTC 'management' this is not likely to actually happen.

Precisely, this is a TTC issue. Build the infrastructure like George Street in Sydney and then pressure the TTC to do better. Toronto can be painfully parochial at times, but that's not a reason to throw one's hands in the air and give up. Having a pedestrian realm as appealing as Sydney feels like fantasy in 2025 but we have to start somewhere.
 
Last edited:
Having a pedestrian only zone would be nice, but what would be much nicer is having transit that can get you somewhere at a reasonable rate of speed. The King Street pilot might not be the fastest, but I don't see how making it into a full pedestrian zone will make it faster. Just ban cars where possible from the road and maintain the street as it is.

How are you going to pressure the TTC to do better? People have been pressuring them to have better line management for decades, and where has that gotten us? One must be realistic about the efficacy of citizen advocacy, and realize that the best solution to a problem is not to create the conditions for it in the first place.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top