ShonTron
Moderator
Hillcrest is interesting. A second-tier mall, but in a somewhat affluent suburb. I would have thought Square One or STC would have made the cut instead.
Hillcrest is interesting. A second-tier mall, but in a somewhat affluent suburb. I would have thought Square One or STC would have made the cut instead.
To be clear....this is NOT the rescue of the chain, there is no buyer and no financing. Assuming this is approved.
What has happened is that people suddenly flooding into Bay stores whether in search of deals, wanting to buy heritage stuff (point blankets) or to pick up a favourite brand or size not available elsewhere has sent sales numbers skyrocketing.
The Bay will actually keep the six stores float.......for a few more weeks/months, based entirely on the sales revenue made.
While that will let them make payroll, I'm not sure how much they'll be able to procure from vendors, unless paying cash up front.
I read that they have $500M worth of inventory.
If they liquidate the inventory in 90 of their stores, then they’re well on their way to paying off their supplier debt.
There’s also the leases in valuable locations that they could sublet.
6 stores is way more manageable than 96. If they upkeep those stores with working escalators and keep only the departments that do well, I can see them surviving through this long enough to sell to a Canadian company like Loblaws that sees value in the “Canadian heritage” brand. The HBC Stripes business alone could be viable.
At close to full market value.........less if marked down.
There's a pecking order for debt.....for the most part, the vendors are not at the top of the list......debt is ~1B
Update: I had misremembered @Northern Light . The Bay holds $315 million in inventory on its balance sheet. That is wholesale. So if they sell their on hand inventory at just above cost, they pay one third to one half of their total debt. Their supplier debt is about $500M so we’re getting close to making the numbers work.
My interest (besides the nostalgia) is in the economy. I’m trying to wrap my head around the cascading effects. 10,000 jobs at Hudson’s Bay to start. Then you have 2000 suppliers owed half a billion dollars, dozens of those business could collapse, taking with them more jobs. Then lastly the empty malls, taking out those businesses too.
I can see why the judge is being so cautious here. If there ever was a time for the Canadian govt to bail out a private business, this might be it. Why do governments bail out airlines and sports arenas but not a Canadian heritage icon with huge economic implications?
Department stores like Eaton's, Simpsons, and The Bay used to get their dry goods locally. The factories on Spadina Avenue supplied many of the clothes that they sold.RIP, it's dead. This is the end of the department stores. I was at Walmart today, the parking lot was packed, every checkout was lined up from here to Timbuktu. Walmart is what the average shoppers wants sadly. But i get it. Not everyone can afford a 90 dollar shirt or 120 dollar dress that The Bay sells. I will admit. If i need new dishware or patio furniture, i will just buy cheap crap from my local Walmart.
I would love to see a viable version of the company saved..........but it will require new owners, and lots of capital.
Me too. I don't think The Bay has much of a chance if they're still run (into the ground) by the US equity firm that caused these issues to begin with.
Who other than Loblaws would be suited to take over? Someone on Reddit mentioned Canadian Tire. It's crazy enough that it might work.
Simons?
Think of it like a Sears and Eatons situation.
Simons knows better than to do that.Oh yeah, why didn't I think of that? It's the most obvious, you're right. Is Simons liquid enough to acquire The Bay? Then again, neither Sears nor Eatons exists anymore so maybe Simons isn't looking to repeat the mistake.