hawc
Senior Member
We need some grown-ups running these things.
Best we can do is conservatives funneling money to their friends and donors.We need some grown-ups running these things.
They couldn't even make the curve the right radius for the trains running on it.These switch issues seem to highlight to me some questionable design choices on this line that I noticed when I first rode it.
Departing Finch West station, the LRT immediately climbs up to a signalized intersection (Romfield Lane), with the exposed track switch right before. Couldn't they have extended the tunnel past here to avoid the intersection (it has no stop) and then keep the track switch underground and protected from the elements?
At Hwy 27, the LRT makes the turn underground, then in trench, but raises up to street level, then right down again to the station, again with an exposed switch. This whole section should have remained underground, with the track switch covered. Humber College Station itself should have been an underground station like Finch West, instead of inexplicably a "surface stop" down in a trench.
These are presumably the two most important switches and stations on the line, and it seems to me they could have been protected from the elements. Maybe there were cost or utility conflict limitations, but I somehow doubt it was anything that couldn't be overcome, especially given the operational and maintenance benefits for a multi-billion dollar line that will probably be around long after all of us.
Mosaic gets hit with financial penalties for the line being down. You would think that having foresight to plow or clear the snow than to be hit with financial penalties.These switch issues seem to highlight to me some questionable design choices on this line that I noticed when I first rode it.
Departing Finch West station, the LRT immediately climbs up to a signalized intersection (Romfield Lane), with the exposed track switch right before. Couldn't they have extended the tunnel past here to avoid the intersection (it has no stop) and then keep the track switch underground and protected from the elements?
At Hwy 27, the LRT makes the turn underground, then in trench, but raises up to street level, then right down again to the station, again with an exposed switch. This whole section should have remained underground, with the track switch covered. Humber College Station itself should have been an underground station like Finch West, instead of inexplicably a "surface stop" down in a trench.
These are presumably the two most important switches and stations on the line, and it seems to me they could have been protected from the elements. Maybe there were cost or utility conflict limitations, but I somehow doubt it was anything that couldn't be overcome, especially given the operational and maintenance benefits for a multi-billion dollar line that will probably be around long after all of us.
Or it could be that the financial penalties and clauses in the contract are weak, to the point that Mosaic doesnt really care to properly act/dont see the lack of maintenance as much of a problem.Mosaic gets hit with financial penalties for the line being down. You would think that having foresight to plow or clear the snow than to be hit with financial penalties.
They can't be that incompetent to not understand that not clearing switches will result in trains not being able to be run and that would result in financial penalties.
So the logical thing would be after the first time would ensure that the switches are cleared to ensure trains can keep running.
But for whatever reason they don't understand it. Maybe they want to bankrupt themselves and walk away? That would be my only logical conclusion.
How are you so sure? If they're not being penalized, then your conclusion doesn't hold. I don't discount the possibility that you have access to more info than a redacted contract.Mosaic gets hit with financial penalties for the line being down.
But are the financial penalties large enough to make it more expensive to have a larger workforce or big $ snow contracts in place.Mosaic gets hit with financial penalties for the line being down. You would think that having foresight to plow or clear the snow than to be hit with financial penalties.
26.1 Overall Responsibility(a) Project Co shall, following the Substantial Completion Date, perform the Maintenance andRehabilitation Services:How are you so sure? If they're not being penalized, then your conclusion doesn't hold. I don't discount the possibility that you have access to more info than a redacted contract.
I've scoured this contract, and don't even see where it says Mosaic (Project Co) is responsible for snow and ice clearing after testing i.e. upon substantial completion, during revenue service etc. The words 'snow' and 'ice' only appear in two clauses that involve phases before revenue / regular service. https://www.infrastructureontario.c...547f7993/finch-project-agreement-redacted.pdf
View attachment 711175
View attachment 711174
Nothing here explicitly outlining snow and ice or 'winter' either:
I believe you, but where under that section does it mention the terms: winter, ice or snow? Or something to the effect of keeping the trackside infrastructure clear of obstruction caused by weather.26.1 Overall Responsibility(a) Project Co shall, following the Substantial Completion Date, perform the Maintenance andRehabilitation Services:
(iv) in accordance with the Maintenance Plan;




