Well, it might happen if the schedule underestimates the travel time, like it did on Finch.That's not how it works. Trains will run faster in the underground section, and maintain longer distances between trains. Then, they will run slower in the surface section, with shorter distances between trains.
Same throughput at every point. Plain physics.
So extended delays at underground stations to maintain spacing.That's not how it works. Trains will run faster in the underground section, and maintain longer distances between trains. Then, they will run slower in the surface section, with shorter distances between trains.
Same throughput at every point. Plain physics.
You've seen those toy marble and track sets, where the track is like a roller coaster. Marbles run fast on some sections, and slow on others, where a motorized section brings the marbles back to the top. Do the marbles "bunch up" on the slow sections? Yes they do, but that doesn't change the rate of speed on the fast sections, nor does it change the overall rate of travel. If the track is set up to have 1 marble pass a certain point every 15 seconds, that's the time between marbles everywhere on the track, in fast and slow sections. I'm not saying you're wrong, because I don't know what you mean, but some people think that having slow sections on a track affects the fast sections, or causes a bottleneck that's something more than just the slow section.There's no doubt that the underground trains will be slowed down by at-grade trains. Otherwise we'll see bunching up of eastbound trains around the tunnel portal.
I'll be nice and say that the section between Mt Olive and Rowntree Mills isn't that bad. At least the trains can reach 60km/h on this section.From JRUrbaneNetwork:
View attachment 701401
We need more of this bad press.
So extended delays at underground stations to maintain spacing.
Ditto, managed to catch a "mommy why are we going so slow" sound bite while recording the painfully slow stretch east of Islington.I was hearing grumbles and surprise of how slow it is. Parents with their kids kept asking how many stops left as if the ride was unbearable..,
Intensification usually follows infrastructure build-out when that infrastructure REDUCES travel times.Rode today and marvelled at how many sfd are ready for intensification. Also, it took ~6 minutes to go from Humber College station to Woodbine by bus so I expect many workers to continue using this route.
If only Ford had killed a transit city route and then replaced it with an elevated metro, maybe it would even be under construction right now...! True fanfic alas...That is fanfic my dude.
As a reference point, over 400 runners ran this year's Toronto Marathon 10-kilometre event in under 55 minutes.Aprox. 5 min per KM is just below (above? Lol) the average runners speed per km at 6 min...
That seems honestly INSANE....
I truly am praying that crosstown is not this bad ...and yes I know it will be this bad maybe worse on the east end.
It's more of what the TTC wrong; it's an inept organization that does everything in their power to slow down LRV operations.Edmonton's Valley Line LRT, a 13.1km LRT running mostly at-grade using the same Bombardier Flexitys as Line 5 and the TTC streetcars, has an average speed of 26 km/h. What are they doing right that TTC is doing wrong? View attachment 701462
TTC spokesperson Stuart Green said in an email that the initial scheduled travel time for the LRT, based on the testing phase, is 46 minutes from one end to the other.
"As we move towards full service and beyond, improvements to average speeds are expected through operational familiarity and confidence and adjustments to corridor operation in collaboration with the City of Toronto," he wrote.




