News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6K     0 

While I agree that tax cuts seem to be the "safe" go to when it comes to padding one's fortunes in an election here. But it seems to be rather quaint, contrite and pointless in comparison to when someone else outside their electoral jurisdiction threatening to take over one's country and/or to economically destroy it...

...so I'd rather they'd focus on that instead.
 
Last edited:
CPC out with a promise to out-do Carney's tax cut.

Yesterday, the Liberal leader committed to reducing the entry level tax bracket to 14% from 15%.

Today, the CPC will see him his 1% and add another 1.25% on top for a total reduction of 2.25% to 12.75%

****

While either of these schemes will cost the treasury billions, though the latter man more so per year.................the benefit to most would be surprisingly small.

About ~$5 per week to $13 per week.

I mean, great and all..but we have a massive structural deficit........low growth.....an apparent need to jack up defense spending by over 10B per annum.....and some desire to pursue large scale infrastructure from pipelines to HSR.

Exactly when is it due to rain money? I want to put some buckets out.
Ya, it doesn't add up, unless Carney is planning to run big deficits (which he criticized Trudeau for). He is committing to keep the existing Trudeau social programs while greatly increasing investments in the areas you mentioned PLUS an income tax cut.
Feels like there is another shoe to drop, possibly after the election. Increasing the GST perhaps?
 
Ya, it doesn't add up, unless Carney will run big deficits (which he criticized Trudeau for). He is committing to keep the existing Trudeau social programs while greatly increasing investments in the areas you mentioned.
Feels like there is another shoe to drop, possibly after the election. Increasing the GST perhaps?

I could see this, possibly softened by removing a smattering of essentials like TP, and Laundry Soap.
 
I cant imagine that would raise much - and it would disproportionately impact the poor. Not sure that's the political win there.

AoD

HST is far less regressive than people think.

Most groceries, and residential rent are exempt. That removes HST from ~70% of low income household spending.

HST, federally, generates just under 8B per year, per point. (or about 40B per year for the current 5 points).

Limited new exemptions cost as much as you want, based on what you include, but I would budget 1.2B (200M per point)

Alternatively, you could increase the low income rebate. But I think the Carbon Tax rebate illustrates the problem w/rebates; that people feel the price pain in real time and get the rebate later and don't connect the two.
 
Of note here, CBC is reporting that TVA requested each party pay them $75,000 to cover their broadcast costs of the debate, which would generally only be available to be watched inside Quebec.
Apparently Carney was the first to say "Ya... no, I'm out."
They keep going on about this in the French-language media. Paying for coverage is objectionable, and the Greens weren't invited. Of course I haven't had cable in 18 years, and I avoid debates. I still remember when TVA had some kind of system failure on an election night and made wildly inaccurate predictions, it was pathetic.
 
Can one assume PeePee would refuse security clearance if he becomes PM...

Asked about why he hasn’t obtained his top secret security clearance, Poilievre reiterated his position that doing so would muzzle him.

Not having security clearance means that Poilievre can’t look at sensitive information, such as details of the foreign intelligence report. All other party leaders have obtained the security clearances.

“What I will not commit to is the oath of secrecy that the Liberals want to impose on me,” he said, adding that a security clearance would mean getting “breadcrumbs” of intelligence without being able to publicly discuss details of security briefings.

Interestingly..

"Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has been asked many times about his refusal to get his security clearance. He often responds, as he did today, that he already received clearance when he served in Stephen Harper’s cabinet.

But that’s not exactly how security clearances work.

As former CSIS director Richard Fadden has explained, a cabinet minister’s clearance has to be renewed. And if there’s been a time lapse, then security officials would have to start the process all over again.

Poilievre has taken an oath as a privy councillor, but that doesn't automatically guarantee him access to intelligence, said Fadden."

and..

  • "He also accused Liberal Leader Mark Carney of striking a "secret" deal with China’s central bank while he was with the global investment firm Brookfield.
  • The meeting between Brookfield and the People's Bank of China was not secret, it was announced publicly."
All from CBC News site: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/li...king-freely-with-security-clearance-9.6697272
 
HST is far less regressive than people think.

Most groceries, and residential rent are exempt. That removes HST from ~70% of low income household spending.

HST, federally, generates just under 8B per year, per point. (or about 40B per year for the current 5 points).

Limited new exemptions cost as much as you want, based on what you include, but I would budget 1.2B (200M per point)

Alternatively, you could increase the low income rebate. But I think the Carbon Tax rebate illustrates the problem w/rebates; that people feel the price pain in real time and get the rebate later and don't connect the two.
It's still a *flat tax though. I'd rather they focus taxes on folks that can afford it as opposed to those who really can't...

*Note: I get that there's rebate business to this, so it's less of a Thatcher Poll Tax that way...but it still assumes everyone can and/or will apply for it. And it always seems a bit of a pittance in returns, IMO...
 
It's still a *flat tax though. I'd rather they focus taxes on folks that can afford it as opposed to those who really can't...

*Note: I get that there's rebate business to this, so it's less of a Thatcher Poll Tax that way...but it still assumes everyone can and/or will apply for it. And it always seems a bit of a pittance in returns, IMO...

I would offer than the dream states for those with a progressive mindset, in Scandinavia all have VATs that are way higher than Canada's. They're mostly around 25%. France is 20%, So is Austria, and the Netherlands is 21%
 
338 March 25th update.

Gm5duxYXoAA7zEb.jpeg
 
Can one assume PeePee would refuse security clearance if he becomes PM...

Asked about why he hasn’t obtained his top secret security clearance, Poilievre reiterated his position that doing so would muzzle him.

Not having security clearance means that Poilievre can’t look at sensitive information, such as details of the foreign intelligence report. All other party leaders have obtained the security clearances.

“What I will not commit to is the oath of secrecy that the Liberals want to impose on me,” he said, adding that a security clearance would mean getting “breadcrumbs” of intelligence without being able to publicly discuss details of security briefings.

Interestingly..

"Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has been asked many times about his refusal to get his security clearance. He often responds, as he did today, that he already received clearance when he served in Stephen Harper’s cabinet.

But that’s not exactly how security clearances work.

As former CSIS director Richard Fadden has explained, a cabinet minister’s clearance has to be renewed. And if there’s been a time lapse, then security officials would have to start the process all over again.

Poilievre has taken an oath as a privy councillor, but that doesn't automatically guarantee him access to intelligence, said Fadden."

and..

  • "He also accused Liberal Leader Mark Carney of striking a "secret" deal with China’s central bank while he was with the global investment firm Brookfield.
  • The meeting between Brookfield and the People's Bank of China was not secret, it was announced publicly."
All from CBC News site: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/li...king-freely-with-security-clearance-9.6697272

I guess he prefer learning about them via the Globe and Mail instead.

AoD
 
Any possible candidate to the House of Commons (or Senate or Governor-General, for that matter) MUST get security clearance. Start with all possible cabinet member, shadow cabinet member, and especially any possible Prime Minister.

Carney slams Poilievre's 'irresponsible' lack of security clearance after reports India meddled in leadership​


From https://ca.yahoo.com/news/carney-slams-poilievres-irresponsible-lack-142909210.html

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's refusal to get his security clearance is back in the spotlight on the campaign trail following reports the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) learned that India helped organize support for his leadership bid.
The Globe and Mail reported Tuesday that CSIS learned that Indian proxies were involved in raising money and organizing within the South Asian community for Poilievre during the leadership race, which he went on to win in 2022.
Sources confirmed the story to Radio-Canada. They were not authorized to speak publicly about the classified information.
Those sources said CSIS's assessment does not indicate whether these efforts were extensive or highly organized. They said the intelligence service has no evidence that Poilievre and his team were aware of the alleged efforts.
Poilievre won handily on the first ballot with 68 per cent of the points.
Radio-Canada reported late last year that Indian consular agents allegedly attempted to derail Patrick Brown's campaign in that 2022 leadership race.
According to the Globe's reporting, CSIS didn't share the information with Poilievre because he didn't have the necessary security clearance.
The Conservative leader has long rejected calls to go through that process, arguing that he wouldn't be able to freely speak or criticize the government based on the top secret information.
"What I will not do is commit to the oath of secrecy that the Liberals want to impose on me. They don't want me to be able to speak about these matters," he said Tuesday during a stop in Vaughan, Ont.
"They will bring you into a dark room and say, 'We will give you some breadcrumbs of intel and then we will tell you you can't talk about any of this stuff anymore.'"
Poilievre said he already received clearance when he was a minister more than a decade ago. Security clearances in Canada require renewal after five years.
"I won the leadership fair and square," he said.
Poilievre then went on the offensive, suggesting Carney's recent position with Brookfield Asset Management, which has a loan with the Bank of China, should raise national security concerns. Carney resigned as chair of the board to run for the Liberal leadership earlier this year.
Carney, who has his security clearance, has already put his assets into a blind trust and said he's working with the office of the conflict of interest commissioner to put up conflict of interest screens.
However, given the unelected official's quick ascension to the prime minister's office and the snap election, that information might not be made public until after Canadians vote.
The initial compliance process for a new prime minister only has to be completed within 120 days of their appointment
"Given that China has murdered our people, taken our people hostage, how will [Carney] ever stand up to foreign interference when he is so financially compromised?" said Poilievre.
At his own campaign stop in Halifax earlier in the day, Liberal Leader Mark Carney took the opportunity to slam Poilievre for rejecting calls and opportunities to obtain his security clearance.
"I find it beyond baffling, I find it down right irresponsible, that the leader of the opposition, day after day, month after month, year after year, refuses to obtain his security clearance," he said.
"As a normal course, in peacetime, when times are tranquil, that's unacceptable then. But at this point in our history, when we face the greatest threats that we faced in generations in most of our lifetimes, he has to answer for that."
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh accused Poilievre of putting his party's interests ahead of the country's.
"To me that disqualifies you as a prime minister candidate," he said. "That's not someone we can trust to stand up to foreign interference."
Poilievre has been under pressure for months to get his clearance to review information regarding foreign interference and his party.
Then prime minister Justin Trudeau told the public inquiry studying foreign interference last fall that he had "the names of a number of parliamentarians, former parliamentarians and/or candidates in the Conservative Party of Canada who are engaged, or at high risk of, or for whom there is clear intelligence around foreign interference."
Poilievre pushed back and said the prime minister should name the individuals he alluded to during his testimony.
Trudeau then said he had asked intelligence services to find a way to brief Poilievre about foreign interference allegations involving his party — and possibly to share "some names" with the Conservative leader.
CSIS said in December that it was looking to share "some information to the leader of the Official Opposition through a threat reduction measure."
But a spokesperson for Poilievre said that the Conservative leader wouldn't be able to act upon the information he received from the CSIS briefing and rejected the terms of that meeting.
Carney, Singh, Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet and Green co-leader Elizabeth May all have their security clearance.
The public inquiry into foreign interference named China and India as the main foreign interference adversaries in Canada.
 

Back
Top