1875
Senior Member
seriously, not everything has to pay for itself. the city/province sets fire to piles of money every day.
And we have not built a new office skyscraper in years. And all the residential conversions are with small floorplate buildings.Correct me if I'm wrong, but the floorplate doesn't seem to be unusually large? Not more than any other skyscraper office building downtown. I get that it's big but I'm not quite clear on what makes it such a barrier.
The arena is a revenue generating asset. Rent from the Flames, concerts, the just announced World Cup of Hockey. And the potential of the team leaving would be a huge economic hole in the city. I think that's unlikely but a risk. Not opposed to some government contribution, but it can't be the city investing $300M to build something that generates very little revenue.Personally, I would rather my tax money be contributing to preserve and restore the Hudson's Bay building than building the arena tbh (and I say this as someone who isn't anti-arena).
You might get an inner city Costco, IKEA, or even a combo someday but it would never happen in a reuse of The Bay building. They'll want a new building with underground parking and loading docks.There's also a bunch of these similar buildings all around the country. So far, there's been no plans announced for any of them. The main successful reuse of these large floor plate buildings was The Post in Vancouver, but office demand is obviously way, way down. Residential conversion will be quite expensive with this space.
Maybe we'll get a downtown Costco/IKEA combo. Those seem to be the only large retailers left these days and require little HVAC and finishings. Calgary could use another Ikea and there seems to be unlimited demand for Costcos.
Density probably matters less to them than how popular the store is, and how many potential customers they have within an hour of travel time.Ikea Shinjuku and Harajuku closed in Tokyo, so I don't expect it to be viable here considering the population density of Tokyo is extremely higher then here
I think it depends mostly on travel times. In Toronto they spread their stores at highway intersection that cater to each section of the GTA. The Ikea we have now is incredibly central that I doubt they're likely to build a new one anytime soon.Density probably matters less to them than how popular the store is, and how many potential customers they have within an hour of travel time.
Winnipeg has one, so maybe we could support two? Although both Vancouver and Montreal have two with significantly larger populations.




