It definitely looks like there will be glass fins/panels to cover the mechanical box on the roof. Here is a rendering from the UT Database page:

View attachment 668512
Correct me if I'm wrong,
But I believe that's an older rendering, before the most recent minor variance application (the one to 106s, 351 meters).
In the architecture plans, the box does stick above the glass panels.
View attachment 668532
As of now, I don't think there has been any change to the architecture plans, and the top of the tower may finish like depicted in the plans above. ^
 
Correct me if I'm wrong,
But I believe that's an older rendering, before the most recent minor variance application (the one to 106s, 351 meters).
In the architecture plans, the box does stick above the glass panels.
View attachment 668532
As of now, I don't think there has been any change to the architecture plans, and the top of the tower may finish like depicted in the plans above. ^
I saw the new plan’s architectural drawings, posted here a few pages back. The mechanical floor is shown in one of the drawings simply for illustration purposes but another drawing indicates it will be covered by glass.
 
^Yes, that one had thrown a lot of folks including myself to believe we where going to be left with an exposed mechanical eyesore, when in fact it will be covered with a vestige glassed wall in keeping the tower's continuity. Also see the CIBC Square towers as an example of that effect.
 
It definitely looks like there will be glass fins/panels to cover the mechanical box on the roof. Here is a rendering from the UT Database page:

View attachment 668512

Sorry, but that rendering is from before this drawing from the approved Minor Variance application:

59060-186471.jpg


42
 
That is one of the drawings showing the mechanical box but there’s another drawing showing the mechanical box will be covered. But anyway we will soon find out.
I asked for clarification from HPA, and I am told that the drawing is accurate sorry to say. HPA did not want to elaborate further.

42
 
So the architects themselves HPA told you the mechanical box will be fully exposed without any covering?
Well, the top 8 metres or so of it, mostly TMD up there, will be exposed, yes.

42
 
Well, the top 8 metres or so of it, mostly TMD up there, will be exposed, yes.

42
If that’s the case that’s very disappointing considering this is the signature tower of the whole project and the shorter/cheaper one next door has the mechanical level covered. Maybe they’re trying to cut costs last minute. Can’t say I’m shocked
 
...then it becomes the questioning of what's stopping them from extending the glass to cover the mechanical which was presumed by most of us. And I'm not sure I am buying the "cheapening" argument here, as they have spared little expense in constructing this so far. As I am also sure extending the glass aerodynamically would help aid the TMD business.
 
Sad to hear the news about the TMD being exposed... it would be so noticable from so many views around Toronto. Hopefully this changes, but I won't get my hopes up.
Anyways, here are a few photos from today:
From Yonge and QQ:
20250724_162109.jpg


QQ and Dockside:
20250724_163105.jpg


And two from Biidaasige Park:
20250724_175824.jpg
20250724_182044.jpg
 
I have a strong feeling that the parapet wall goes all the way past the TMD they just sliced it in the diagram to show how tall that part of the structure goes 0 though I might just be being hopeful
...and the people involved here are not saying much. So what you are saying can't be entirely ruled out either.
 

Back
Top