If they don't have to go through the process of building ramps for the parking in one young, since they have the ramps already built in phase 1 and connected to one young through the knock-out walls, then would this be a slightly faster bottom to ground build than your general construction?
Yes, constructing parking flat slabs (drainage sloping omitted) is much more productive versus a constantly sloping parking slab or a parking slab with a ramp.
 
Wow I wish we had someone taking as many photos of the Lower Don Lands/Portlands project thread area as much as this project. Definatley some nice photos in here.
 
Very cool to learn how each person can have such a different difficulty with the same picture.

After reading about the latest contest you authored, I played the game myself, 2s, 7s.
For photos 1 and 2 respectively.

For me, the first one was just luck mostly. Just where I happened to glance first.
But it immediately inspired 2 thoughts when I looked at the second one, that it wouldn't be on the tower itself, and that you would go left of the tower instead of right, just to avoid boredom.

I have to say though, that second one is really subtle.
 
Last edited:
Finally found the second one. A lot more than 5 minutes. Very subtle indeed. I passed over that spot a few dozen times.
 
that second one is really subtle.

This is always my goal but sometimes I have to choose between extremely subtle and fairly obvious, and the latter will usually win because the whole point is that my name is visible.
 
From Friday and Today.

688A2DCF-A48E-41D2-A64B-BB7A056C1BE2.jpeg


908E8039-58D0-4628-AFF6-013D7C260C62.jpeg


93007A58-73B8-414C-9EA9-E618C056A8FB.jpeg


1FCC9775-3285-421B-A91F-BCE94E165A11.jpeg


4448B9BA-B48E-40F3-B853-C9C5FC44788A.jpeg


BA259812-6045-4168-AB98-6CFE3314B116.jpeg


F69A47EC-9588-499D-BA28-0A9694A097F2.jpeg


Thursday Oct 21
F49CB492-62FE-4C01-AAC1-52DC9B8B3326.jpeg


3A53B5FE-9FE9-427C-8DB6-1AD6325B86F3.jpeg


D82E3BF2-11C6-4444-B713-B893B32292F8.jpeg




B86287B0-9DD6-4342-A4D3-8B7D978A357E.jpeg


20128E43-FAE4-41DB-ADB3-60F6992CDB2F.jpeg


Edit.
added one from Monday.
E0702905-B654-42CD-AC9F-2209856320F3.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 651BC14F-CBD9-41DE-AC3C-4EEDF0DA1A09.jpeg
    651BC14F-CBD9-41DE-AC3C-4EEDF0DA1A09.jpeg
    431.8 KB · Views: 206
Last edited:
So if the rumour is true, they could be going for up to 360m here potentially? That's somewhat exciting. (Don't quote this, i just did some quick math without looking at the original arch plans.)

Feels like that would be more than a 'minor' variance if true.
 

Back
Top