Oct 5
2144BF73-5E5B-4918-9A5E-4314B36E07B0.jpeg


DE4A6AD1-C804-4A4B-A09A-20578AA6BAB3.jpeg


FD1D2918-8CA4-443B-AD05-381814E9FE98.jpeg


Oct 12
6EDF7BE2-7BA5-4088-92C4-E10920C5D7D6.jpeg


79822A38-7C07-4BF1-B9D1-CE68008711CF.jpeg


Oct 13
D0D36113-5ED2-490B-BA03-5F4327B0C81B.jpeg



3C40DC71-AB92-42C9-B1D9-1630B5E07A4D.jpeg


AB6220E7-1275-461D-9515-4B865DBFB3F6.jpeg
291D3A36-2D3E-48D7-B652-D8F93530E59D.jpeg
 
A bit different than the usual pics here. This one filled a nice little gap in my view of the skyline:

View attachment 356070

It's funny, sometimes I don't think the Toronto skyline looks that big, and then other shots it looks like it gives NY a run for it's money. This shot is one of the shots where the skyline looks massive.
 
Our skyline mostly seems to follow a single street in a North/South fashion with slight deviations from it here and there, with the densest part starting from the Financial District.The depth happens depending on which angle you approach that.
 
If they don't have to go through the process of building ramps for the parking in one young, since they have the ramps already built in phase 1 and connected to one young through the knock-out walls, then would this be a slightly faster bottom to ground build than your general construction?
 

Back
Top