News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6K     0 

Recent evidence (King St.) shows that they are becoming a bit more open to it. I find King Street's transit priority quite effective.

It's not going to be 100% priority where an LRV absolutely never sees a red light - but they likely will never have to wait too long for one either.

I wonder what would happen if all streetcar lines were reserved only for streetcars/emergency vehicles? If they added signal priority to those lines, would there really be much difference between them and the Crosstown?
 
I wonder what would happen if all streetcar lines were reserved only for streetcars/emergency vehicles? If they added signal priority to those lines, would there really be much difference between them and the Crosstown?
The different will be tighter stop spacing, which can be resolved easily but not without public backlash, there won’t be any centre platforms, the streetcars cannot be connected together, and the platforms cannot board two vehicles at a time as they’re too short.
 
The different will be tighter stop spacing, which can be resolved easily but not without public backlash, there won’t be any centre platforms, the streetcars cannot be connected together, and the platforms cannot board two vehicles at a time as they’re too short.

As a casual rider, would you notice the difference?
 
there wouldn't be a massive difference in quality of service in that theoretical scenario, no.


Stop spacing and stoplight locations are much tighter on legacy streetcar routes though - St Clair is essentially that it operates much slower than Eglinton will. This means that although the fundamentals are the same, service speed is a lot less than the crosstown will be. I'm guessing st. clair averages about 20km/h, the surface portion of the LRTs is supposed to operate around 25km/h from what I remember.
 
The Crosstown account seems to be putting out more pictures lately. They just posted this one: "looking out of the excavation happening under the intersection for Science Centre Station. Crews reached a depth of 17 metres last week".

I remember asking someone awhile ago for the reason why this station on the surface portion is underground and I believe I was told it was due to the grades and for a future Relief Line integration. Is my memory correct?

50986794_2043476535746891_7090540734209589248_o.jpg
 
Despite what it says on the Crosstown website, transit priority will be completely in the discretion of Toronto Transportation Services (ie: they have the final call).

Judging from what we've seen from them in the past 20 years, they wont implement it and they'll find a way to screw 200 passengers in a LRV in favor of single occupancy vehicles. Why do I say this? Just look at the Spadina & St.Clair ROW's for further evidence.
As far as I know council can simply direct staff to implement transit priority. That's not to say that they will of course.

Eglinton and the other Transit City lines really should have been designed like Vancouver's SkyTrain or Ottawa's Confederation Line (complete grade separation) or Edmonton/Calgary LRT (mostly at grade with complete signal priority). So called rapid transit shouldn't have to stop at red lights.
 
The Crosstown account seems to be putting out more pictures lately. They just posted this one: "looking out of the excavation happening under the intersection for Science Centre Station. Crews reached a depth of 17 metres last week".

I remember asking someone awhile ago for the reason why this station on the surface portion is underground and I believe I was told it was due to the grades and for a future Relief Line integration. Is my memory correct?

View attachment 172547

That and its a major intersection. Just like the elevated transit over Black Creek, which is another major intersection.
 
it's underground as it's a major transfer location - it's going to have a bus terminal on it for the Don Mills bus, and while grades could allow for a surface station, they do make the underground station easier. A proper, large underground station makes the pedestrian transfer volumes more manageable compared to a surface station.
 
To be honest, as long as the Leslie intersection had aggressive signal priority, I’ll be fine if the rest of the line had little to none.
 
The Crosstown account seems to be putting out more pictures lately. They just posted this one: "looking out of the excavation happening under the intersection for Science Centre Station. Crews reached a depth of 17 metres last week".

I remember asking someone awhile ago for the reason why this station on the surface portion is underground and I believe I was told it was due to the grades and for a future Relief Line integration. Is my memory correct?

View attachment 172547

I think it has less to do with the future DRL and more to do with Don Mills & Eglinton being one of the busier intersections in the City. It is far busier than Vic Park, Pharmacy or Warden (other candidates for a tunnel). If the Crosstown were at street level in this intersection there would be a huge impact on left-hand turns for East West traffic and signal prioritization would disrupt North-South traffic.
 
The Crosstown account seems to be putting out more pictures lately. They just posted this one: "looking out of the excavation happening under the intersection for Science Centre Station. Crews reached a depth of 17 metres last week".

I remember asking someone awhile ago for the reason why this station on the surface portion is underground and I believe I was told it was due to the grades and for a future Relief Line integration. Is my memory correct?

View attachment 172547

I would just love to dump or bulldoze all that snow that fell on Eglinton Avenue and the sidestreets into that hole, and let it melt.
 
I've got a question - On Crosslinx Transit Solution's site, they say (and have shown in their renderings that were 90% through the design phase) that they were putting the western entrance to Mount Pleasant station in the heritage building that was a Second Cup for a while. But passing through the intersection last week i noticed that the entire site was demolished. Does anybody know what happened to the heritage retention plan? It was a really nice plan!

Here's the site in question: http://thecrosstown.ca/the-project/stations-and-stops/mount-pleasant-station
 

Back
Top