News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.8K     0 
The tough part is that if you are mad at Harris for cancelling the subway, then you must be opposed to the current LRT - because if Harris did not cancel it, then LRT would not be possible.

Alternatively, you can be happy that Harris cancelled the subway to allow LRT to be built.

The only people who have a right to be mad at Harris are those who think Eglinton should have been built as subway in its entirety.

And what about people who think LRT or subway would've been fine on Eglinton?

The world isn't binary
 
A subway across Eglinton would have been better in the long term but likely would have remained a "stubway" like on Sheppard due to the prohibitively higher capital costs and would be less likely of having as many stations en route making it of less local benefit.
 
Can the Eglinton LRT be upgraded to a subway in the future?

The LRT would be l-o-n-g-e-r. When the "Eglinton Subway" was first "started", it was to be built from Eglinton West to Black Creek (York Centre Station). The current underground LRT is m-u-c-h longer.

Don't forget there will be a Finch West LRT and a Sheppard East LRT... allegedly.
 
A subway across Eglinton would have been better in the long term but likely would have remained a "stubway" like on Sheppard due to the prohibitively higher capital costs and would be less likely of having as many stations en route making it of less local benefit.

Exactly. I prefer a rapidly expanding extensive network of LRTs than decades in waiting subway extensions. The city will work well with a subway spine complemented by a network of LRTs bisecting it and small buses to reach into neighbourhoods that can't yet justify either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rbt
And what about people who think LRT or subway would've been fine on Eglinton?

The world isn't binary

Not to mention we're talking about underground LRT and underground subway.

The original Eglinton subway would've been 1/3 the length of the currently built tunnel and not cover dense areas like Yonge-Eglinton. So we're getting a tunnel triple the length in one go now. Huge increase in the amount of underground transit.
 
Can the Eglinton LRT be upgraded to a subway in the future?

No. The station platforms are too short. They are only about a third the length of a subway platform.

Not to mention we're talking about underground LRT and underground subway.

The original Eglinton subway would've been 1/3 the length of the currently built tunnel and not cover dense areas like Yonge-Eglinton. So we're getting a tunnel triple the length in one go now. Huge increase in the amount of underground transit.

It's likely that if the Eglinton West Subway had of been built back in the 1990's it would connect to the airport by now; and by this time we would be building, or planning to build, an extension east towards Kennedy.
 
This is a bit too much coulda, woulda, shoulda for me.

The big thing to imagine is what would have happened to development along Eglinton, had there been a subway by now. And what that might have pulled away from the development elsewhere. Especially since it would have been done under an earlir planning regime. I can't say what would have been different, but I suspect we might hate it already. Let's hope we get it right after Crosstown.

In the Harris era, web graphics were a lot more primitive. There would not have been a cool project tracker giving weekly updates. That's half the fun these days :)

- Paul
 
No. The station platforms are too short. They are only about a third the length of a subway platform.



It's likely that if the Eglinton West Subway had of been built back in the 1990's it would connect to the airport by now; and by this time we would be building, or planning to build, an extension east towards Kennedy.

Your first point isn't true. The Eglinton Line platforms can accommodate trains of at least 93 metres, compared to 138 metres on Yonge Line. It's closer to two thirds the length. It's also equal to the length of the platforms on the Sheppard Line
 
On that note, I find it very curious that the Crosstown, with its higher peak point ridership and narrower cars, will have trains that are the same length trains as the Sheppard Line.

The last trip I took on the line was eastbound weekday at about 7:00 PM and almost all the seats were taken. Does anyone here know what rush hour crowding is like on the Sheppard Line?
 
Does anyone here know what rush hour crowding is like on the Sheppard Line?

It's a little tight in the middle cars but the end cars nearly always have plenty of room.Nobody gets left on the platform for lack of space.

Of course this loading is quite purposeful; the line is budgeted rather than a technical limitation.
 
Last edited:
No. The station platforms are too short. They are only about a third the length of a subway platform.
The platform length is 90 metres. A 4-car Toronto subway train is 92 metres long.

Yes, it could be upgraded to subway, though you'd have to build platforms in each station (among other details). Most importantly, the tunnel diameter is slightly larger than that on on the Vaughan extension.
 

Back
Top