News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.9K     0 
Agreed on Eglinton West; I'm not entirely sold on the BD extension but really as things go it's a better candidate for subway than, say, Sheppard. It won't be as bad as some think.

But the fact Eglinton isn't getting into Etobicoke, or especially the airport, is a shame.
Honestly, depsite what I was telling TJ all the scarborough subway options are bad. If it came down to it, I want the SRT back. That or build both the Sheppard Subway and BD extension and terminate them at STC.
 
What is there for light rail on Eglinton West to connect to anyways? The airport? Mississauga Transitway? Mississauga? Seems like very low ridership potential. Eglinton East to connect to the lake is obviously a much better option.
 
The airport is a large employment area. Further, Eglinton West would intercept a lot of busy feeder bus routes and bus routes are the big contributor to subway ridership levels generally speaking.
 
I would imagine that Eglinton West should get similar ridership as the Scarborough section.
 
Eg west is supposed to be really low ridership however.

Second time I've seen you say this. But as far as I know there aren't any reports covering ridership on Egg West. The best thing I could find is this document on Steve Munro's site. In 1986 Eglinton West was projected to move 17,600 pphpd while Sheppard was 15,400. Today, Sheppard Subway has nearly BRT level usage. I suppose Eglinton West would be similar.
 
Last edited:
I could imagine that Eglinton West extended to the airport and surrounding employment area could generate a good load of ridership, not only from airport and airport-area workers, but also from travellers taking advantage of the standard-TTC-fare rapid transit connection at said airport.
 
What is there for light rail on Eglinton West to connect to anyways? The airport? Mississauga Transitway? Mississauga? Seems like very low ridership potential. Eglinton East to connect to the lake is obviously a much better option.
SMLRT should have been built too. We both know this should have been a subway. Would have shut so many people up...

The airport is a large employment area. Further, Eglinton West would intercept a lot of busy feeder bus routes and bus routes are the big contributor to subway ridership levels generally speaking.
Bingo. And it's cheaper then UPX, which will fail because it's expensive.
 
The reasons I like the Eg West LRT extension:

1. It goes to the airport & connects the Mississauga busway
2. There are apartment clusters on Eglinton along the way
3. Connects to all the NS bus lines & roads in Etobicoke
4. Richview corridor (the green space beside Eglinton) will likely be developed in the future
5. From a network perspective, moves us towards the goal of a grid-like network of continuous long lines (the Jarrett Walker dream). It becomes even more of a crosstown line in terms of being able to travel across the whole city.
6. It's cheap & fast to build since it's entirely on the surface and the expensive underground part is already being built.
7. Gives central Etobicoke better transit
 
What is there for light rail on Eglinton West to connect to anyways? The airport? Mississauga Transitway? Mississauga? Seems like very low ridership potential. Eglinton East to connect to the lake is obviously a much better option.

Everyone talking about Eglinton West should be aware of two things:

A) It should have been built, and it was cancelled DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. The hole filled in with cement by a spiteful government, and history will repeat itself on Sheppard East and Finch if the PC's are elected.

B) The Eglinton West will connect to the Renforth Gateway, which will connect with a 427 Rapidway and the Mississauga Transitway. Here is the Metrolinx profile on the area, lots of good stats for everyone to go to town with.
 
And it's cheaper then UPX, which will fail because it's expensive.

Metrolinx is putting way too much effort into researching the right price for the UPX for it to fail. People will shell out for a faster, more convenient ride. A large share of the ridership will be higher income earners. but if they take the UPX instead of a personal car or taxi, aren't we still achieving the main transportation objective? No one at Metrolinx or in the government will admit it, but it is designed for these people, because they are frequent flyers which is expensive. As morally bad as it looks, it won't prohibit a regular Joe from taking it for an annual or semi-annual trip. It's just numbers people.

Eglinton West to downtown will take a bit longer and require a transfer or two, and that's okay for those of us that only want to pay TTC fare instead of UPX fare. It will also be fairer for those that don't fly at all and commute to/from work near the airport.
 

Back
Top