ShonTron
Moderator
Line 5 got its first major disruption this morning! Signal issue between Mount Dennis and Cedarvale, shuttle buses dispatched.
The station depth conversation reminds me of the time I visited St. Petersburg, Russia. Now that is a deep metro system. Due to something to do with ground waters, they built it at astonishing depths. The deepest station there is 86 meters below the ground. Not sure if I've been at that exact station, but the entire metro system there seemed equally deep. And all the stations are served by a single continuous escalator run from the top all the way to the platform. The escalator tunnels are so long and narrow, they seem to come to a single point off in the distance. Oh, the vertigo you get there....This got me curious as to both stations depths. Highway 407 is 21.1m deep and Avenue crushed the record with 32m. This record will be smashed again when Queen Station opens on the Ontario Line at a depth of 45m. And like the previous record, it may not be able to enjoy being the deepest for long as Royal Orchard Station on the Yonge North extension is proposed to be 50m deep!
For reference, the deepest station in the London Underground is Hamstead Station at a depth or 58.5m and the U.S.'s record is 79m at Washington Park Station in Portland. Then there's the deepest in the world - located at Hongyancun Station in Chongqing in China at 116m.
/waste of everyone's time
???????If what they have in common is the propulsion, then they are basically the same vehicle.
The station depth conversation reminds me of the time I visited St. Petersburg, Russia. Now that is a deep metro system. Due to something to do with ground waters, they built it at astonishing depths. The deepest station there is 86 meters below the ground. Not sure if I've been at that exact station, but the entire metro system there seemed equally deep. An all the stations are served by a single continuous escalator run from the top all the way to the platform. The escalator tunnels are so long and narrow, the seem to come to a single point off in the distance. Oh, the vertigo you get there....
View attachment 714361
image source
Don't people listen or watch the news? Don't people read the notices at the bus stops?
Haha, speaking of low information folks... I called my friends just over a week ago only to find out they were packing their bags, leaving for a Cuban vacation that night. I sarcastically joked that they are going to attempt to catch the last flight out before Cuba runs out of jet fuel and bombs start falling. I was met with a confused "what do you mean?". After explaining to them the whole oil embargo thing and food shortages that Cuba is experiencing, all I heard back was "phh, stop making sh!t up" in response.Apparently not. I was talking to people in my office yesterday and was amazed how many people had no idea about it. Some saying, "Oh there's going to be a subway now on Eglinton?" And when I was like, "No there IS one now! It's finally open after 15 years construction! Except it's an LRT not subway." And then they're like, oh it's a streetcar? So funny. I guess most folks aren't as deep into this as us.
Apparently not. I was talking to people in my office yesterday and was amazed how many people had no idea about it. Some saying, "Oh there's going to be a subway now on Eglinton?" And when I was like, "No there IS one now! It's finally open after 15 years construction! Except it's an LRT not subway." And then they're like, oh it's a streetcar? So funny. I guess most folks aren't as deep into this as us.
because the future costs and the current costs add up to the total costs of a project.....It's isn't rocket science. You're acting like just because we've paid 9 Billion to date means the other costs aren't relevant....it's a cost that we will have to pay for therefore it's part of the project, because otherwise with your logic the Scarborough Subway only costs $2.6 Billion.I'm getting my numbers from Metrolinx's quarterly report released this week for spending through the end of 2025.
I'm not sure where you are getting your numbers - but looking at Metrolinx's numbers, it appear you have used the cost to build what they've built to date PLUS all the O&M spending for decades into the future!
Why not use the current costs for construction, rather than all the future costs?
View attachment 714320
I haven't been able to tell, I know that the TTC will often have people in red smocks standing near stations and stops where guidance is needed. Did they deploy those people for Eglinton and if so where?Don't people read the notices at the bus stops?
The 34 still runs, primarily to serve stops between the stations, but it does serve every stop along Eglinton where the 32 or old 34 would once stop.On Monday, there was a man waiting for the 32D Eglinton West bus on Emmett Avenue. Had to tell him that the 32D is dead, kaput, gone, no longer in service, replaced by the 73B (and Line 5), etc..
Later in the day during rush hour, also noticed people waiting on Eglinton Avenue for a bus that comes every 10 to 20 minutes as the 34 Eglinton. Don't people listen or watch the news? Don't people read the notices at the bus stops?
Ultimately I think the disussion of displacing the left turns at the DVP ramps is a red herring, because it's already extremely easy to guarantee a green light for the LRT with the existing intersection configuration. At the west intersection there's a 3-stage pedestrian crossing, so LRVs can theoretically truncate the red light for the DVP if they need to. At the east intersection there's a single-stage pedestrian crossing which would be an obstacle when it's called, but based on the distance from any destinations I suspect it's extremely rare for someone to walk across the street there.There's a discussion a few pages back ( Ha!, over 1,200 posts ago, and it was only early January) noting that the interchange at DVP actually had additional clover leaves in the remaining corners that could, in theory, be revived. Those make for lousy pedestrian and cycling conditions for people crossing fast moving traffic.
***
That discussion starts about here.
Eglinton Line 5 | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx | Arcadis
**disclaimer -- I am an amateur with a crayon that doesn't really know what he's talking about* No harm in throwing ideas out. An easier (but unrealistic since it inconveniences drivers) solution to the first section could be to simply ban left turns to/from Leslie, forcing some drivers to...urbantoronto.ca
Trains will be running in both directions every 3.5 minutes during peak come May. That could mean trains crossing the DVP every 1-2 minutes (combined from both directions). I'm not sure it would be so easy to add extra time to the following cycle, when you could have trains at basically every cycle. I think in retrospect they really should have had the tunnel portal east of the DVP around Wynford to avoid this, since the DVP is probably the hardest cycle to modify (and requires MTO approval).Reducing time for the DVP is a non-issue because you can easily give extra time to the DVP in the following cycle to compensate for any lost capacity.
Yea with the DVP becoming provincial now, there is no way MTO will let Metrolinx / the TTC play with signal timings there. The timings and capacity around freeway interchanges are sacrosanct for MTO as preventing backlogs on the on-ramps back onto the mainline freeway is critical to safety. If queues back up onto the mainline freeway it can be incredibly dangerous. MTO in general is famous for being very restrictive in the design of their interchanges and nearby local access roads - I've sat in a few meetings personally on this matter and they would never sign off on anything that they think would impact freeway operations.Trains will be running in both directions every 3.5 minutes during peak come May. That could mean trains crossing the DVP every 1-2 minutes (combined from both directions). I'm not sure it would be so easy to add extra time to the following cycle, when you could have trains at basically every cycle. I think in retrospect they really should have had the tunnel portal east of the DVP around Wynford to avoid this, since the DVP is probably the hardest cycle to modify (and requires MTO approval).
There's tons of opportunity for both better TSP and also conversion of full 4-way signalized intersections at minor streets into signalized crosswalks with "right-turn only" onto Eglinton. Particularly east of Victoria Park.




