News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.8K     0 
The people in the High Park area did not have local ratepayer or community associations until the developers began to start to build the high-rises. After the high-rises, the local residents formed associations along with new reform members of Council, one of them was David Miller. In other words, in attempting to build high-rises along Eglinton (and Sheppard) will result in more reform or left-leaning councillors as high-rises sprout. That's why "be careful of what you wish for" Rob.

But Eglinton, particularly outside of the central stretch, has a lot more big box commercial and old industrial properties (I'm thinking the Caledonia area for example). It's much easier to do a comprehensive redevelopment on properties like this, because you aren't expropriating someone's home to do it. These properties are owned by businesses, and if it makes business sense for them to sell it, they will sell. This especially holds true if it's a chain store, because there's even less sentimental attachment by the company compared to a family-owned business.

These types of properties don't exist along Bloor, at least not until you get out past Kipling. The example you brought up is a valid comparison for Eglinton between say Dufferin and Bayview, but outside of that there are a lot of non-residential properties that are ripe for redevelopment if an LRT station were to be put in the area.

This is why I think adding in some stops on the Georgetown line between St. Clair and Fort York would be great. There are so many under-used industrial properties along that stretch that can be redeveloped into some pretty intense TOD neighbourhoods.

What I hope they do with Eglinton is around every station, identify properties that could potentially be redeveloped, and create Secondary Land Use Plans for the area around every stop along the line.
 
But Eglinton, particularly outside of the central stretch, has a lot more big box commercial and old industrial properties (I'm thinking the Caledonia area for example). It's much easier to do a comprehensive redevelopment on properties like this, because you aren't expropriating someone's home to do it. s.

What I hope they do with Eglinton is around every station, identify properties that could potentially be redeveloped, and create Secondary Land Use Plans for the area around every stop along the line.
The problem is those homes whose backywards face Eglinton way up high on a hill west of Caledonia (with those small businesses in front at street level). You can get rid of those businesses which i think are just auto related and try to build condos but the depth from the sidewalk to the back of those small buildings is very small and the the height I would think would cut into those hills which at the top are the backywards of those homes. Obviously the homes face an inner street looking south. Which means you would have developers trying to buy those homes and probably succeeding and then that inner street has these condos and the whole thing starts.
 
According to the Allen Road-Eglinton West Station presentation (PDF download), the south entrance has been changed from automatic entrance to potential future entrance/exit (pending development at police station parking lot). In other words, it might not happen.

BTW. The original Eglinton Subway project would have ended at its east end terminal at Allen Road and only trail tracks would have continued east for a few short blocks.
 
Last edited:
According to the Allen Road-Eglinton West Station presentation (PDF download), the south entrance has been changed from automatic entrance to potential future entrance/exit (pending development at police station parking lot). In other words, it might not happen.

BTW. The original Eglinton Subway project would have ended at its east end terminal at Allen Road and only trail tracks would have continued east for a few short blocks.

as someome who lives kn the south side and has to make that stupid walk to the north side to the island first and then to the station,i was really reallly looking forward to the station on the south side.

other notes - how big a condo can fit behind the station entrance on the east parking lot land? why is there no room for a condo on the west side of the land? i didnt know the police station site was even a option to be redeveloped. i know with the lawrence heights redevelopment that lawrence was requesting a police station. could this station be moving? will beth shalom be a potential condo site?

btw im really upset there wont be a station entrance on the south side and i will be writing a letter in.
 
as someome who lives kn the south side and has to make that stupid walk to the north side to the island first and then to the station,i was really reallly looking forward to the station on the south side.

other notes - how big a condo can fit behind the station entrance on the east parking lot land? why is there no room for a condo on the west side of the land? i didnt know the police station site was even a option to be redeveloped. i know with the lawrence heights redevelopment that lawrence was requesting a police station. could this station be moving? will beth shalom be a potential condo site?

btw im really upset there wont be a station entrance on the south side and i will be writing a letter in.

Well I believe the early bird gets the prize and in this case that was the developers.
 
I would so terminate the Allen at Lawrence. It would make the construction of this station so much easier and they would have a place to put the TBM spoil. And when it was complete and levelled off, what would acres of new real estate do to the bottom line of this project. Think of it as a road toll.
 
I would so terminate the Allen at Lawrence. It would make the construction of this station so much easier and they would have a place to put the TBM spoil. And when it was complete and levelled off, what would acres of new real estate do to the bottom line of this project. Think of it as a road toll.

I agree, if anything the construction disruption will make it impossible for all the traffic from the Allen to go anywhere regardless.
 
I agree, if anything the construction disruption will make it impossible for all the traffic from the Allen to go anywhere regardless.

another plus is that there would be enough room for proper on and off ramps (doughnuts) at lawrence if the allen ended at lawrence.
 
another plus is that there would be enough room for proper on and off ramps (doughnuts) at lawrence if the allen ended at lawrence.

There have been other comments that Allen Road will have to be temporarily closed when the construction reaches Eglinton West.

There used to be separate off ramps at Lawrence from the southbound Allen Road prior to the opening to the extension to Eglinton. Although it would be nice to fill in the Allen ditch from Lawrence to Eglinton, I just dont see it happening. People talk about the traffic problems on Eglinton because of Allen, imagine Lawrence and Marlee if it was gone. People would still want to get to Eglinton and to the Allen, one way or another.
 
So have Allen continue south of Lawrence, but have it at-grade and Avenue-ized all the way down to Eglinton. Kind of like how in Markham the 404 northbound feeds into Woodbine.
 
People would still want to get to Eglinton and to the Allen, one way or another.

It has been shown time and time again that if you remove roads, the traffic goes with them. If you discourage using this area as car commute route, then it won't be. Plus, you're adding densification right beside subway stations which will create transit users, not more automobile drivers.
 

Back
Top