News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

Ahh that’s interesting. From what I can tell, most councillors just go straight to council and submit member motions to axe planned sidewalks while all the councillors are distracted and blindly vote yes. It seems Burnside took the official method through IEC first but it gave some time for the councillors to process the motion as well as the submissions so the damage was reduced. We need to figure out a way to stop getting these sidewalks cancelled because the damage is irreversible.
 
Ahh that’s interesting. From what I can tell, most councillors just go straight to council and submit member motions to axe planned sidewalks while all the councillors are distracted and blindly vote yes. It seems Burnside took the official method through IEC first but it gave some time for the councillors to process the motion as well as the submissions so the damage was reduced. We need to figure out a way to stop getting these sidewalks cancelled because the damage is irreversible.

Not irreversible; but significant, if it pushed sidewalks out to a future reconstruction - a 60 year delay.

The could be added in the interim, but there are added costs.

To be clear, we completely agree that the current nonsense of councillors ambushing staff plans at the last minute is not acceptable. I just want to be a smidge less fatalistic.
 
Interesting how they're incapable of finding out who is doing this.

I might suggest:
1752180088295.png
 
^The Tinder situation is interesting because there are three low-rise apartment buildings tucked onto an otherwise isolated residential street. The resulting pedestrian and vehicular volume arguably pushes it out of the "local backstreet" street typology.

Debate on these disputes need to be more data driven, and framed according to the exceptions that are allowed under the original Council decision of 2019.

-
1752234331950.png
 
Yeah, if the vandals want to make Parkside ungovernable with cameras, do it right once and for all. Give the people what they want. They don't want cameras, give them road redesign.
Legislate for GPS speed delimiters for all non-emergency motor vehicles.

A speed limiter is a governor used to limit the top speed of a vehicle. For some classes of vehicles and in some jurisdictions they are a statutory requirement. Such as Ethiopia, Kenya.

When the GPS tracker detects that the driving speed reaches the speed limit set, the GPS tracker will output a signal to activate the speed limiter. At this time, the system will force the speed limit, and the accelerator pedal will automatically adjust and cannot refuel. When the speed drops below the speed limit, the speed limit is lifted at this time.
 
How could they realistically? Someone dresses up in black hoodie and ski mask and gloves (not that they would even check their fingerprints), appears from the trees in High Park at 3 AM, cuts the camera, and disappears into the trees. Even if caught on camera there's no way to identify them.

Really unless there's a police officer there 24/7, there's no way they're going to catch the culprit.

The only solution is to redesign the speed camera so it sits high up on a hydro pole.
If a crime being challenging to solve due to the perpetrator taking steps to conceal their identity is the threshold for the police not bothering to investigate at all, then so many crimes are functionally legal.
 
If a crime being challenging to solve due to the perpetrator taking steps to conceal their identity is the threshold for the police not bothering to investigate at all, then so many crimes are functionally legal.
Who is saying they are not bothering to investigate?
 
On a "lighter" note:


30 day slap on the wrist. How about a license suspension till 25?

AoD
I support roadside crushing of these cars... And the offender has to press the button
 

Back
Top