Where were these words when the Minnesota politicians were shot and killed?
Where were these words when the Minnesota politicians were shot and killed?
While you won’t be getting much argument on me on this. But it should be noted that thanks to this incident puts the outcome of the consequences of this in the hands of those who hate free speech and other civil liberties the most…Freedom of speech should be protected at all cost, no matter a person's beliefs are. Nobody deserves to die because of being crazy. Violence is never the answer
He seems unwell.
I would argue there are natural limits on free speech by being…er, free speech. So it’s not absolutism by any stretch. And will likely have consequences if it starts to go south.No, there need to be limits to freedom of speech
I’ve had heard this as being Trump’s Reichstag moment. /bleah
…and finally, does anyone know what the shooter’s motivation was here. I’ve tried to look this up…only to find mainstream media types eulogizing Kirk, which made me want throw up. Maybe I am looking in the wrong places. /sigh
One thing is for sure is this was a very professional hit job. The fact that no arrests have been made or even weapons recovered means that the track is getting cold.
That was one of my first thoughts, or his divisiveness following a natural disaster in a 'blue' state.Where were these words when the Minnesota politicians were shot and killed?
I admittedly haven't seen at lot of clips of him but I don't recall hearing him call for outright violence against others. I found him to be arrogant and dismissive, but a decent debater who shone when he was up against people who were not, which he tended to attract (perhaps the clips purposely focused on that, IDK). That he was against Republican or right wing touchstones like immigration, sexual identity, etc. is without question but advocating against something is not necessarily violence against something.His "speech" that we're concerned with "protecting" is calling for violence against others. Just to be clear.
Huh? "Professionals aren’t going to leave a victim bleeding; they’re going to leave them dead."There’s zero proof of anything that this was some kind of professional hit. Professionals aren’t going to leave a victim bleeding, they’re going g to leave them dead. That means security shots.
This is a state with a high number of sport shooters, and at 200 yards (likely with a scope), is a shorter range than the US military requires infantry to be able to hit a target using iron sights alone; 300 yards.
As others have this stated, there are a good number of people in the state who could’ve made this shot, especially on a seated, non-moving individual.
1) Cops are bad at their jobs.
2) Security was relatively light there.
3) A large panicked crowd is relatively easy to blend into.
4) The fact that no casing has been found could mean a single action bolt hunting rifle.
For anyone who might want to lionize or "only say nice things about the dead" in regards to Kirk;
There's footage of the alleged shooter fleeing on a far away rooftop, around where the shot rang out. The shooter's lucky they're in bumfuck utah. They got Mangione so can't say for certain they won't get this guy. Also, the timing of this "assassination" is pretty weird huh? Like didn't the epstein birthday book stuff come out recently? dons got some crazy plot armour lmao, the timing is interesting...Huh? "Professionals aren’t going to leave a victim bleeding; they’re going to leave them dead."
Have you seen the close-up video of the shooting? If you haven't, I don't recommend that you or anyone else view it. What is seen cannot be unseen (it's horrific).
The second Charlie was struck in the neck; he was effectively dead. It was obvious from the blood gushing out from the neck wound (sorry to be so graphic). There was no way that he was going to survive such a grievous injury, despite what must have been valiant efforts at the Hospital.
There can be no doubt, and I mean ZERO doubt, that this was a professional hit job, probably conducted by someone who has lots of experience sniping innocents from a very long distance. If my suspicions are correct, the killer could very well be outside of the United States by now, on his way to a territory where he cannot be extradited to the U.S... Time will tell, but IMO this was the work of a professional assassin, and I suspect that he had confederates inside the United States.
If my gut instincts are correct, this will be one of the many unsolved assassinations in the history of American political assassinations. Another "we may never know".