Huh? "Professionals aren’t going to leave a victim bleeding; they’re going to leave them dead."
Have you seen the close-up video of the shooting? If you haven't, I don't recommend that you or anyone else view it. What is seen cannot be unseen (it's horrific).
Does it matter if I've seen it or not?
The fact that the shooter didn't hit the head or go for a second shot, kind of negates the idea that this was some kind of professional hit.
The second Charlie was struck in the neck; he was effectively dead. It was obvious from the blood gushing out from the neck wound (sorry to be so graphic). There was no way that he was going to survive such a grievous injury, despite what must have been valiant efforts at the Hospital.
Are you a doctor? People have survived injuries like this. Kirk was still alive when transported to the hospital and
AP reported he was there being treated in critical condition.
There can be no doubt, and I mean ZERO doubt, that this was a professional hit job,
I will revisit this post later when you're proven wrong here. Conspiracy theories don't help the situation.
probably conducted by someone who has lots of experience sniping innocents from a very long distance.
200 yards away is where the shooter was, and that isn't a "very long distance" in terms of rifle hunting. In fact, scopes recommended for that range are
in the area of 40mm (in other words, not very big). You don't even need to be prone to make shots at that range, which is generally only recommended for shots greater than ~350 yards. Why would any professional sniper risk being that close to the target if they don't absolutely need to be, and again why wouldn't they take a security shot?
I grew up on a farm, and regularly used the family .22. My uncle (then RCMP Sergeant) would take my brother and I skeet shooting when we visited. As an Air Cadet (back before they switched to air rifles) we trained on small caliber bolt rifles nearly identical to those used in the olympics. I'm telling you right now, I could probably have made a shot the size of a human at that range.
Am I of the skill level of a professional assassin? Because I can tell you right now, I certainly don't believe I am.
As I said, every U.S. infantryman in required to hit a(n I believe 6") target at 300 yards using iron sights alone. 200 yards for a human sized target would not be difficult for just about anyone with a small amount of training; like just about anyone who grew up in a state in which hunting is pretty common. Y'know, like Utah is.
Time will tell, but IMO this was the work of a professional assassin, and I suspect that he had confederates inside the United States.
Is it your opinion or "ZERO doubt"?; because they are not one and the same.
If my gut instincts are correct, this will be one of the many unsolved assassinations in the history of American political assassinations. Another "we may never know".
Or, it's been less than 24 hours and it would be silly to make such assumptions. It took almost two full days to
find and arrest Vance Boelter and five days to
find and arrest Luigi Mangione. Give it time, ffs.