News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

One thing is for sure is this was a very professional hit job. The fact that no arrests have been made or even weapons recovered means that the track is getting cold. The killer could very well be out of the country by now. The big question is, did the killer act alone or was he put up to it by another entity/country? I'm guessing this murder will not be solved, and as with Butler, PA, and the Las Vegas Mandalay Bay massacre, the media will not be pressing hard for answers.

Both the Butler and Las Vegas shooters are known, and are dead. We know quite a bit about both of the shooters, though obviously since they're dead you can only press so hard for answers from them.
 
There's footage of the alleged shooter fleeing on a far away rooftop, around where the shot rang out. The shooter's lucky they're in bumfuck utah. That footage was crazy yo, I didn't watch it myself but reading everyone's description of it on twitter and reddit was nauseating.

A few years ago, I probably would have watched the video, even despite the warnings. I've moved beyond that... absolutely no intention of seeking it out.
 
There's footage of the alleged shooter fleeing on a far away rooftop, around where the shot rang out. The shooter's lucky they're in bumfuck utah. They got Mangione so can't say for certain they won't get this guy. Also, the timing of this "assassination" is pretty weird huh? Like didn't the epstein birthday book stuff come out recently? dons got some crazy plot armour lmao, the timing is interesting...

That close up footage was crazy yo, I didn't watch it myself but reading everyone's description of it on twitter, instagram and reddit was nauseating.

Videos of the shot are still going around on social media so if you're someone who can't stomach violence of the sort, please be careful.
I saw it. It was quick and lethal.
 
Huh? "Professionals aren’t going to leave a victim bleeding; they’re going to leave them dead."

Have you seen the close-up video of the shooting? If you haven't, I don't recommend that you or anyone else view it. What is seen cannot be unseen (it's horrific).

Does it matter if I've seen it or not?

The fact that the shooter didn't hit the head or go for a second shot, kind of negates the idea that this was some kind of professional hit.

The second Charlie was struck in the neck; he was effectively dead. It was obvious from the blood gushing out from the neck wound (sorry to be so graphic). There was no way that he was going to survive such a grievous injury, despite what must have been valiant efforts at the Hospital.

Are you a doctor? People have survived injuries like this. Kirk was still alive when transported to the hospital and AP reported he was there being treated in critical condition.

There can be no doubt, and I mean ZERO doubt, that this was a professional hit job,

I will revisit this post later when you're proven wrong here. Conspiracy theories don't help the situation.

probably conducted by someone who has lots of experience sniping innocents from a very long distance.

200 yards away is where the shooter was, and that isn't a "very long distance" in terms of rifle hunting. In fact, scopes recommended for that range are in the area of 40mm (in other words, not very big). You don't even need to be prone to make shots at that range, which is generally only recommended for shots greater than ~350 yards. Why would any professional sniper risk being that close to the target if they don't absolutely need to be, and again why wouldn't they take a security shot?

I grew up on a farm, and regularly used the family .22. My uncle (then RCMP Sergeant) would take my brother and I skeet shooting when we visited. As an Air Cadet (back before they switched to air rifles) we trained on small caliber bolt rifles nearly identical to those used in the olympics. I'm telling you right now, I could probably have made a shot the size of a human at that range.

Am I of the skill level of a professional assassin? Because I can tell you right now, I certainly don't believe I am.

As I said, every U.S. infantryman in required to hit a(n I believe 6") target at 300 yards using iron sights alone. 200 yards for a human sized target would not be difficult for just about anyone with a small amount of training; like just about anyone who grew up in a state in which hunting is pretty common. Y'know, like Utah is.

Time will tell, but IMO this was the work of a professional assassin, and I suspect that he had confederates inside the United States.

Is it your opinion or "ZERO doubt"?; because they are not one and the same.
If my gut instincts are correct, this will be one of the many unsolved assassinations in the history of American political assassinations. Another "we may never know".
Or, it's been less than 24 hours and it would be silly to make such assumptions. It took almost two full days to find and arrest Vance Boelter and five days to find and arrest Luigi Mangione. Give it time, ffs.
 
I admittedly haven't seen at lot of clips of him but I don't recall hearing him call for outright violence against others. I found him to be arrogant and dismissive, but a decent debater who shone when he was up against people who were not, which he tended to attract (perhaps the clips purposely focused on that, IDK). That he was against Republican or right wing touchstones like immigration, sexual identity, etc. is without question but advocating against something is not necessarily violence against something.
Saying that school shootings are a fair trade for having guns is advocating violence. Saying that children should be made to watch executions is advocating violence. Saying LGBTQ should be stoned to death is advocating violence.
 
Saying that school shootings are a fair trade for having guns is advocating violence. Saying that children should be made to watch executions is advocating violence. Saying LGBTQ should be stoned to death is advocating violence.


A youtuber for children took quotes from the bible to justify pride month celebration and charlie just said in response that he shouldn't because it also says "gay people should be stoned". He never said it on his behalf.
 
Saying that school shootings are a fair trade for having guns is advocating violence. Saying that children should be made to watch executions is advocating violence. Saying LGBTQ should be stoned to death is advocating violence.
He died doing what he loved, advocating for guns. Dude's last words were gang violence, can't make this shit up lol.
 
…and finally, does anyone know what the shooter’s motivation was here. I’ve tried to look this up…only to find mainstream media types eulogizing Kirk, which made me want throw up. Maybe I am looking in the wrong places. /sigh
They detained a person of interest, who has since been released. I don't know if they know who the shooter is. The person was apparently seen on surveillance footage dressed in dark clothing, from a rooftop a couple hundred meters away.
 
Or they aimed for the head or chest and missed. It's like saying Thomas Crooks was aiming for Trump's ear.
He could've been aiming for his neck too, and he got him perfectly. If anything he was likely aiming for center mass, perhaps the bullet just got pushed around with wind and hit him in the neck, whatever the case, it was a perfect killshot.
 
The whole Thomas Crooks thing was a bit weird.

The chances of a bullet just barely grazing your ear so as to leave a tiny wound that heals in days is rather unlikely. We'll never know, but I would not be surprised in Crooks was a stooge that shot a random person in the crowd and Trump used an old WWE trick of using a razor to nick his ear while he was down. Why on earth would Secret Service let him get up and do his fist pump pose in front of the flag while there was an active shooter... The way the Secret Service were handling security at the event, and seemingly ignoring members of the public pointing to Crooks on the roof of that building is odd.
 
Reminder that this story buries the Epstein stuff that had been floating around this week.
While that’s tantalizing, it’s still going well into /tinfoil land if suggesting Trump or one of his goons ordered a successful hit on Kirk as a distraction from the Epstein business. That would suggest they’re competent enough to pull something like that off to begin with, I thinks…
 

Back
Top