News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

Yes, all true but just an example. It would be less expensive to go to Buffalo. But it’s also reflective of the Chinese example where apparently, based on links in the comments of the tweet, most Chinese citizens can’t afford the cost which makes it readily available for visitors.

GNMI Clinics are regularly recommended in my local groups because of short wait times. They do say many of their services are covered by OHIP. https://www.gnmi.ca/mri/
 
I had a sleep study done in 2019. I was scheduled to have surgery on my nose and throat in 2020. Pandemic occurred, so I was bumped down the waiting list as non-urgent. I followed up in 2022 and 2023 if I was still on the waiting list and was told I was. I asked my family doctor in 2025 to look into whether I was still on it and she confirmed that I was not. She referred me to another specialist, who strangely tried to convince me I didn't need the surgery. He also commissioned another sleep study (why?), so now I'm waiting on that. :mad:
 
I had a sleep study done in 2019. I was scheduled to have surgery on my nose and throat in 2020. Pandemic occurred, so I was bumped down the waiting list as non-urgent. I followed up in 2022 and 2023 if I was still on the waiting list and was told I was. I asked my family doctor in 2025 to look into whether I was still on it and she confirmed that I was not. She referred me to another specialist, who strangely tried to convince me I didn't need the surgery. He also commissioned another sleep study (why?), so now I'm waiting on that. :mad:
I got booked for a sleep study within a couple of weeks of my referral. Definitely location dependent!
 
I had a sleep study done in 2019. I was scheduled to have surgery on my nose and throat in 2020. Pandemic occurred, so I was bumped down the waiting list as non-urgent. I followed up in 2022 and 2023 if I was still on the waiting list and was told I was. I asked my family doctor in 2025 to look into whether I was still on it and she confirmed that I was not. She referred me to another specialist, who strangely tried to convince me I didn't need the surgery. He also commissioned another sleep study (why?), so now I'm waiting on that. :mad:
I hear if you are willing to go further, wait lists can be considerably shorter in other parts of the province. I think the discussed single queue system never really panned out. One specialist can have a one year waitlist and another only a few weeks.
 
...
Here are the actual wait times, copied by me, from the Ontario Health website, here...
To add there is a timely CIHI report, indicating Ontario fared well against other provinces on many procedure wait times.

The Star has also picked up on the story.
Screenshot_20250612_072245.jpg
 
I hear if you are willing to go further, wait lists can be considerably shorter in other parts of the province. I think the discussed single queue system never really panned out. One specialist can have a one year waitlist and another only a few weeks.
When I lived in Northern Ontario, I had to wait much longer to see a specialist than I do living in the GTA. Plus there was of course the associated travel.
 
To add there is a timely CIHI report, indicating Ontario fared well against other provinces on many procedure wait times.

The Star has also picked up on the story.
View attachment 658158

Lets be clear here, yes, Ontario is doing somewhat better than other provinces, but no, it is not doing well.

Let me flip the script on the above for a start.............18% of all people needing a knee replacement waiting longer than the medically recommended maximum of six months.

So, I skimmed the OECD results for this.......they don't measure the first wait (wait to see a specialist), but they do measure the second, wait from referral for surgery to surgery for knee replacement.

Spain was 74 days, (median), Sweden 79, Ireland 92

Ontario was 120 (average) (we don't use median) for Priority 4 patients.

***

Perhaps more notable is comparing the recommended maximum wait for a higher priority patient for this procedure which would mean someone with severe difficulty walking without a mobility aid.

That wait time should not exceed 42 days according our own guideline, but the average wait is actually 139 days! Yeah, that's right, higher than for lower priority patients.

OECD Stats here: https://www.oecd.org/en/publication...ting-times-for-elective-surgery_68501edc.html

Ontario Stats here: https://www.ontariohealth.ca/public-reporting/wait-times-results
 
Last edited:

Ford government obfuscated Greenbelt records through code words: commissioner​


The RCMP is investigating the government’s decision to remove 15 parcels of land from the Greenbelt, which the auditor general and integrity commissioner found favoured certain developers.

From https://www.thestar.com/politics/ford-government-obfuscated-greenbelt-records-through-code-words-commissioner/article_1b14f695-83e4-51e8-92d5-3951dd71e2dc.html

Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s government broke its legal, record-keeping obligations amid its now-reversed decision to open up parts of the protected Greenbelt lands for housing, the province’s information and privacy commissioner has found.

Political staff were using code words to thwart document requests and left a surprisingly small paper trail for such a consequential policy, commissioner Patricia Kosseim wrote as part of her annual report.

A number of freedom-of-information appeals her office received on Greenbelt-related requests revealed concerning, systemic issues, she wrote.

“The Greenbelt-related appeals offer a clear example and cautionary tale about the consequences of inadequate recordkeeping,” the IPC report said.

“When key government decisions are not properly documented, when code words are used, or when records are stored in fragmented ways across personal and official systems, transparency suffers, and with it, public trust.”

In addition to issues previously highlighted by the auditor general around political staff deleting Greenbelt emails and using personal accounts, the government sometimes used code words in communications.

Staffers sometimes referred to the Greenbelt project in messages as “special project,” or “GB,” or “G*,” with references to G* being next to impossible to find. Those terms and their inconsistent use made it “unduly difficult” to search for Greenbelt-related records, Kosseim wrote.

“Worse, the use of the code word “G*” made it virtually impossible to find relevant records, given that the asterisk (“*”) is used as a technical wildcard when conducting text searches, returning any word starting with “G,” she wrote.

That meant having to forego using the code word “G*” as a search term, so some Greenbelt records may have been missed, Kosseim wrote.

“These practices not only violate legal record-keeping obligations, they also erode public trust in the integrity of government decision-making,” she wrote.

“The public has a fundamental right to know how and why decisions are made, especially those that impact protected lands like the Greenbelt. When records are obfuscated and made difficult, if not impossible, to find through evasive code words, transparency is compromised, and oversight becomes illusory.”

But there was also a “surprising” lack of Greenbelt documentation at all, which undermines transparency, Kosseim found.

“The near-total absence of decision-making documentation is particularly concerning, especially on a file as high profile and consequential as changes to the Greenbelt,” the report said.

“Despite evidence of meetings and discussions involving premier’s office staff and ministry staff about the Greenbelt, there was very little documentation of what was said or decided in those conversations, aside from a few contemporaneous notes taken by ministry staff.”

The RCMP is in the midst of an investigation into the government’s decision to remove 15 parcels of land from the Greenbelt to remove 50,000 homes — a process the auditor general and integrity commissioner have found favoured certain developers.

Premier Doug Ford’s office says the government has taken several steps to strengthen record-keeping practices, including reminding staff to preserve and manage records in accordance with requirements and holding training sessions, and will continue to comply with legal obligations.

NDP Leader Marit Stiles said “enough is enough,” because the last time political staff were found to be deleting government records, one went to jail.

A top aide to former premier Dalton McGuinty was convicted of illegal use of a computer relating to his destruction of potentially embarrassing documents about the Liberal government’s costly decision to cancel two gas plants before the 2011 provincial election.

Stiles said there should be consequences for these new failings.

“When will the premier finally answer for the disturbing culture of dodging accountability and disappearing records within this government?” she wrote in a statement.

“Today’s report makes it clear that the Ford government broke the law while trying to cover up their Greenbelt carve-up.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025.
 
Lets be clear here, yes, Ontario is doing somewhat better than other provinces, but no, it is not doing well.

Let me flip the script on the above for a start.............18% of all people needing a knee replacement waiting longer than the medically recommended maximum of six months.

So, I skimmed the OECD results for this.......they don't measure the first wait (wait to see a specialist), but they do measure the second, wait from referral for surgery to surgery for knee replacement.

Spain was 74 days, (median), Sweden 79, Ireland 92

Ontario was 120 (average) (we don't use median) for Priority 4 patients.

***

Perhaps more notable is comparing the recommended maximum wait for a higher priority patient for this procedure which would mean someone with severe difficulty walking without a mobility aid.

That wait time should not exceed 42 days according our own guideline, but the average wait is actually 139 days! Yeah, that's right, higher than for lower priority patients.

OECD Stats here: https://www.oecd.org/en/publication...ting-times-for-elective-surgery_68501edc.html

Ontario Stats here: https://www.ontariohealth.ca/public-reporting/wait-times-results
My comments were not intended to state we were doing well on a worldly stage and perhaps could have added my 2 cents for clarity...apologies.

Just highlighting the release. And I don't think that's what the article or report suggests either.
 
There's a new group, "Project Ontario," that popped up which appears to be a bunch of disgruntled conservatives activists who don't think Doug Ford is "conservative enough."


In actuality, it's likely a pet project of two conservative activist brothers (says my source) who are trying to spark a highly improbable party revolt.
What happened to the "True Blue" party? Not conservative enough? 🤣
 
The editor-at-large of The Hub, Sean Speer, told CBC News he is not involved, but offered to pass on an interview request to the authors of the manifesto. CBC News also sent a message to the Project Ontario website, but received no response to any inquiry.

Ginny Roth, a longtime organizer within both the Ontario PC Party and the federal Conservative Party, posted a link to Project Ontario on social media and wrote, "I'll be signing up to be part of the conversation." CBC News asked Roth for an interview, but she declined.


These cowards can't even show their faces in public. Get lost.
 

Back
Top