News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6K     0 

This is exactly what Frum pointed out. If people are fed up with the current immigration system and you keep telling the public that only the fascists care about immigration, guess who they'll elect? We saw this in the US. We're seeing this in Europe. There is only one left-leaning party that doesn't have an issue with the far-right making hay of immigration in Europe. And guess what they did?




What was wrong with our previous point system that the Trudeau government had to create and/or massively expand alternative immigration (TFW) and residency (student to PGWP) pathways to that system? And next, why the hell did they not readjust when the abuses were getting obvious? It took them till 2024 to react. What kind of governance is that?



The same public that didn't have a problem with immigration for decades is suddenly the problem? Sorry, I'd say the problem is the with the system and some of the current immigrants it brings in.
To me, a big part of the problem is identified in this news article. Setting aside what he is alleged to have done or where he came from:

Court heard Singh arrived in Canada from India in 2020 as an international student. He got a work permit in 2022 and has been working as a truck driver since, Gautam said.

You come as a student: get your education and leave.
You want to work: apply from where you are resident.

My son-in-law was a part-time IT prof for a few years including during Covid; years two and three of a three-year program. A significant majority were international students. There were some students he saw only occasionally, some not at all.
 
You can reject these views. As the all the evidence, including Canadian ones linked upthread, shows, the voters won't do that.

If the surge of the far-right everywhere from Japan to the US to Europe to here hasn't changed your mind, I don't know what will. Best of luck in getting others to agree, you'll need it!
The straw man here is I am not rejecting any evidence of this whatsoever, rather raising concerns about where the voters and pundits are going with this…

…but I will leave you to think whatever you want about my positions. I have no intentions of turning this into some crusade, rather allowed more seasoned minds speak to this….if they are any around. /shrug
 
Last edited:
The Canada Strong Pass thing is fine, as far as it goes, the evidence from this year seems to be that it did aid in bolstering domestic tourism; though many Canadians (and others) are independently boycotting the U.S. which I suspect is the more influential factor.
Something that would further boost domestic tourism is doing something about the skyhigh costs of domestic air travel. I have relatives who decided to eschew their planned U.S. vacation for a domesitc trip and were shocked by the prices. Not sure what the Carney government's position is on the recommendations from the Competition Bureau released earlier this year but they would do well to take steps to increasing competition in the industry.
You come as a student: get your education and leave.
You want to work: apply from where you are resident.

My son-in-law was a part-time IT prof for a few years including during Covid; years two and three of a three-year program. A significant majority were international students. There were some students he saw only occasionally, some not at all.
A remedy that could ensure students issued visas are here to actually study is a restriction that would forbid off-campus work for the first two years of the study period. Currently they are allowed up to 24 hours per week during study periods but i'm not sure if that is actually being enforced.
 
Something that would further boost domestic tourism is doing something about the skyhigh costs of domestic air travel. I have relatives who decided to eschew their planned U.S. vacation for a domesitc trip and were shocked by the prices. Not sure what the Carney government's position is on the recommendations from the Competition Bureau released earlier this year but they would do well to take steps to increasing competition in the industry.

I'd be interested to hear what trips they were looking at, as Canadian prices swing quite a bit from one market to another.

Base ticket prices in a quick scan I just did for Toronto-Vancouver vs Buffalo - LA, showed comparable pricing, maybe even a bit cheaper in Canada.

Toronto to Thunder Bay, however, is noticeably more expensive.

Competition aside, I suspect add-on Airport Improvement Fees and well as Airport Landing Fees (built-in to ticket price) are key factors in higher costs in Canada.

Air Canada provides a handy list of AIFs for Canada, here:


I found a list of Pearson's Aeronautical Fees - 2025:


Here's a list of Buffalo-Niagara' fees:


Have fun w/those and see how they compare (I'm not sure I haven't take the time, but I am curious)
 
Last edited:
You come as a student: get your education and leave.
You want to work: apply from where you are resident.
Exactly this. I wish this is what Canada did from day one. If I go to France to get my MBA, I’m not staying in France afterwards, but am expected to return to Canada. If after my studies I decide I want to live permanently in France, I would apply from Canada.
 
Last edited:
I think, prior to the diploma mill excesses, letting students work for 3 years after graduating makes sense and is a benefit to the country. Why shoo away well educated, young people who are at the beginning of their productive years and raising families?
 
Something that would further boost domestic tourism is doing something about the skyhigh costs of domestic air travel. I have relatives who decided to eschew their planned U.S. vacation for a domesitc trip and were shocked by the prices. Not sure what the Carney government's position is on the recommendations from the Competition Bureau released earlier this year but they would do well to take steps to increasing competition in the industry.

A remedy that could ensure students issued visas are here to actually study is a restriction that would forbid off-campus work for the first two years of the study period. Currently they are allowed up to 24 hours per week during study periods but i'm not sure if that is actually being enforced.
I'm really not bothered by limited off-campus work by students. Post secondary is expensive, it would be part-time (assuming they are actually attending class) and on-campus employment can be quite limited, particularly at a smaller campus.

Driving long-haul truck doesn't seem to fit.
 
Why shoo away well educated, young people who are at the beginning of their productive years and raising families?
Why does every other country do it? I’d be okay with giving Canadian-educated foreigners preference if they apply for permanent residency after they return to their country of origin.
 

Back
Top