News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

If these units are unappealing for residents, perhaps they could work as short term rentals like Airbnb. I'm not sure I see the logic in eliminating existing units in a housing shortage. Surely it would make more sense to instead build new units that are more livable?

The object would be to consolidate units that are ultra small, typically below 55m2 or about 550ft2.........to create larger 1 or 2 bdrm units (or if larger numbers of contiguous units) were purchased, 3bdrm units.

The units we're discussing currently aren't renting or selling, they're sitting vacant, they aren't sellable/rentable at prices in line w/what investors require/expect to recover their investment/service costs.

We're not talking about taking active units out of the market, but empty ones, to repurpose them to fill the market need which is for livable sized units, for singles, couples and families. The problem is that the market incentive isn't there either, when you look at the cost of consolidating and renovating and current market sales/rental rates.

This is not the sort of program you would run open-ended, I think it would time-limited, at least one of the units being consolidated would have to be long term vacant, you would have to deliver what the market needs, and in exchange for any subsidy the government either gets money from the sale/rent for a time, or the owner agrees to affordable rents for a fixed period.
 
Carney has announced his Parliamentary Secretaries. The role of Parliamentary Secretaries vary across ministries and caucuses, but they typically fill in for the Minister at Question Period, events and press conferences.


Among familiar faces, Jennifer McKelvie, former Deputy Mayor of Toronto, is one of two Parliamentary Secretaries to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure.

I figured that Nate Erskine-Smith, Bill Blair and Karina Gould would be granted Parliamentary Secretary roles after not cracking the cabinet, but all three were left out again.
 
Carney has announced his Parliamentary Secretaries. The role of Parliamentary Secretaries vary across ministries and caucuses, but they typically fill in for the Minister at Question Period, events and press conferences.


Among familiar faces, Jennifer McKelvie, former Deputy Mayor of Toronto, is one of two Parliamentary Secretaries to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure.

I figured that Nate Erskine-Smith, Bill Blair and Karina Gould would be granted Parliamentary Secretary roles after not cracking the cabinet, but all three were left out again.

Pretty sure Nate is on the outs.

Blair I don't think will run again, could be wrong He's 71 now............if the government lasts 4 years he'll be 75.

Karina should have a future in the party, not sure what's going on there.
 
Pretty sure Nate is on the outs.

Blair I don't think will run again, could be wrong He's 71 now............if the government lasts 4 years he'll be 75.

Karina should have a future in the party, not sure what's going on there.
Carney has completely cut Karina off. I am curious as to what that is all about.
 
Blair I don't think will run again, could be wrong He's 71 now............if the government lasts 4 years he'll be 75.

I don't see it either.

He is at the age where most Senators and Politicians have retired. With his diminished roles in Parliament, his career is winding down.

To add to that, the riding is starting to go more progressive. As an MPP you have Doly Begum of the NDP and prior to Bill Blair you had Dan Harris from the NDP. We are long past the days of bible thumpers like Tom Wappel in Scarborough Southwest.

Bill Blair represents more of a Blue Liberal than anything else given his past career and portfolios. He does win handily in elections here but that is only because of the caliber of candidates put forth by the other parties.

I can see the riding going from red to orange as time goes on.
 
Among familiar faces, Jennifer McKelvie, former Deputy Mayor of Toronto, is one of two Parliamentary Secretaries to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure.

I figured that Nate Erskine-Smith, Bill Blair and Karina Gould would be granted Parliamentary Secretary roles after not cracking the cabinet, but all three were left out again.
The McKelvie appointment to the housing file on the surface seems like a headscratcher. She made some comments earlier this year during a city council vote on housing that seem counter to the Liberals housing agenda:
1749236143923.png
 
The McKelvie appointment to the housing file on the surface seems like a headscratcher. She made some comments earlier this year during a city council vote on housing that seem counter to the Liberals housing agenda:
View attachment 656855

In that quote, she's entirely correct.

It aligns with what I've said here multiple times.

The focus of any real solution involves:

1) Reducing the number of people in the Country in the near term (until housing has caught up) and this means a focus on students (particularly in non-Uni programs), and on TFWs.

2) Raising incomes (higher minimum wage, more private sector wage growth by constricting the labour supply as above and by other means (more paid vacation, more generous parental leave), and higher social assistance rates.

3) Because the latter will almost never allow someone access to market-housing, we require non-market or subsidized housing in some fashion or another. Not a little bit either. Toronto could use at least another 40,000 units.

I don't see her take as a problem for the Liberals, I see it as a useful tonic to their misplaced focus.

Remember I'm all for zoning reform and have had a meaningful role in making it happen to. But lets not pretend that that will meaningfully solve the housing crisis. It won't. Its something we should still undertake, but with the understanding it will make almost no difference in market rents and sales prices.
 
Yeah, not to rain on anyone's "now we're safe' parade here, but I am certainly not down with this "Strong" Borders Act (Bill C-2) business, to put it mildly...

Here's what is says from the horse's mouth:


Here are the pointed criticism about it:


^More partisan'd source:


^Presumably, less partisan'd source:

...either way, the overview...or my extreme beef with this is as follows:

1) It's a disguised omnibus bill, which is usually the Gish gallop way of doing dodgy legislation if the sitting government wants put in unpopular decisions with less scrutiny and oversight from the public. The thing that the Liberals said they wouldn't do while governing in the last election, I'm told.

2) It has excessive and draconian measures to tighten immigration policies including turning way asylum seekers under distress and cancelling immigration applications when they feel like. No policy should ever be about "when feeling like it", as this leads to arbitrariness that all good democracies should avoid at all costs. Not to mention, being a gross violation of human rights to which they should be held to account for.

3) The searching and withholding of folks' private mail, internet communications and browsing and transferring of funds without legal warrants based on suspicion and without evidence or oversight. Our civil liberties will be going up in flames with that. And how...

4) Sending our personal private information to be scrutinized by the US authorities under the orange You Know Who administration. (Er...weren't they planning to invade us a few weeks back?) I don't know about anyone else, but I am extremely uncomfortable with my personal information ending up in their hands, knowing what they're all about and demonstratively so. And they may do with that.

5) This bill seems to be more an exercise to appease the Trump administration than strengthening our borders. As it has little to do with the latter...like actually stemming guns and illicit fentanyl in our country, And more to do with throwing our civil liberties and human rights under the bus (something the Liberals promised to protect in the last election) for better trade deal with the US. Where we really should be telling the same administration where to stuff themselves and their racist, bigoted policies and narratives instead, IMO.

...and it goes on.

I get that when I voted for the Liberals, I was taking a chance...a big chance, that they would less likely pull this kind of crap than the Conservatives would. But that never guaranteed they wouldn't do the same either. So here I am today posting something I should never have to because our government wants it cake and eat it too, to put that mildly. I feel betrayed that they are capitulating to the very entity that they supposed to protect us from, making this bill not very secure for any us. At all...

...so yeah, it's an /elbows down legislation that needs to be rescinded if not dramatically change to remove all the gross and duplicitous stuff from it. So I am here to be that person to tell you..and warn you all about this. That our True North will not be free if this goes threw, to which this bill is already under it's second reading. Just saying. /bleh
 
Last edited:

Carney to announce Canada’s defence spending will hit NATO’s target of 2% of GDP this fiscal year, sources say​

Prime Minister Mark Carney is set to announce what his government is billing as the largest increase in defence spending since the Second World War, measures that sources say would enable Canada to meet NATO’s 2-per-cent military expenditure target this fiscal year, well ahead of any previously announced schedule.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/pol...adas-defence-spending-will-hit-2-of-gdp-nato/

I eagerly await the details of this because this is a rapid escalation in the committed timeline, and would require $15 -$20 billion in additional spending. Don't see how Carney avoids raising taxes of some form in order to raise revenues.

Also, wouldn't be surprised if this commitment is part of an unspoken agreement with the U.S. in regards to the ongoing trade talks.
 
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/pol...adas-defence-spending-will-hit-2-of-gdp-nato/

I eagerly await the details of this because this is a rapid escalation in the committed timeline, and would require $15 -$20 billion in additional spending. Don't see how Carney avoids raising taxes of some form in order to raise revenues.

Also, wouldn't be surprised if this commitment is part of an unspoken agreement with the U.S. in regards to the ongoing trade talks.

While this is a perfectly logical thread for this discussion, we tend to discuss defence policy in the Canada and the World thread, as such I started a discussion on this subject there, with additional info.

 
From June 20 to September 2, 2025, enjoy free or discounted admission to some of the country’s most iconic places.The Canada Strong Pass lets you explore the richness of the country — from museums to nature to railroads.Start exploring:
 
Canada has dropped a few standings in the ranking of world's most peaceful countries. Canada dropped three spots, from the 11th most peaceful country to number 14. At the 14th spot, Canada ties with the Netherlands, and is just behind Malaysia and ahead of Belgium. Iceland and Ireland remain the top two countries with a state of peace that’s considered "very high." The U.S. ranks 128th, behind Kenya and ahead of Ecuador.

See The 19th edition of the Global Peace Index (GPI), published by the Institute for Economics & Peace

1750351536346.png

1750351566797.png
 
From June 20 to September 2, 2025, enjoy free or discounted admission to some of the country’s most iconic places.The Canada Strong Pass lets you explore the richness of the country — from museums to nature to railroads.Start exploring:
That's a pretty disappointing list of participating museums.
 

Back
Top