News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

If people could make money off homelessness the problem would be fixed already.
When you live downtown east like I do, you soon realize there's a huge industrial complex built around the homeless, with hundreds of workers dependent on the homeless for their careers, relevance and salaries. You don't get to be the $325k head of Dixon Hall, $200k head of the Sally Ann, $175k head of the Fred Victor Centre, or the $170k head of the Good Shepherd Ministries (with a 37% increase in salary over 2022) by eliminating your client base. I sometimes wonder what came first to downtown east, the homeless industry or the homeless people, since you go to where the services are (there's a reason we don't see homeless encampments in Craigleigh Gardens or Scarborough's Guild Park).

On the other hand, I think we CAN as a society make money on ending homelessness and putting the industry on notice that there's no money to be made here. By building housing for every one of the estimated 150,000 to 300,000 homeless people in Canada we can reduce the cost of policing and hospitalizations, while at the same time making it easier to address the costly societal issues faced by the homeless, such as addictions and mental illness. Within the decade many of these folks would become taxpaying, regular employed people, while the cost of taking care of any unemployed or retired people will be reduced. And we can rid Canada's cities of the encampments, parks of garbage, and reduce the drug dealers, pimps, thieves and others who profit from the existence of our homeless populations. And, there's more money to be made through eliminating homeless, since our tourism and reputation will improve (just look at how the opposite is occurring in San Francisco).

The Feds should lead a constitutional amendment to put a right to housing in the Charter, as part of a national emergency housing strategy. We need to treat homelessness like a national emergency, like a tsunami or earthquake, where the government(s) wouldn't just leave Canadians outside to freeze to death, but would rush to rebuild communities. What can it cost to provide housing to 300,000 people in their chosen communities where they have family or work? Not everyone is going to want or need to live in the expensive cities. Those with serious physical or mental illness may need supportive housing, but the rest might be able to live regular independent lives once provided with permanent housing.


 
Last edited:
JohnnyStrides did an interview and walkthrough with the creator of the 'Tiny Tiny Homes' prototype bike-home designed as a better alternative for temporary housing than tents in parks. Targeting a cost of $5-10k per unit.


I like the constructive solution. I'm not sure how well it would scale for the hundreds and thousands of unhoused folks, but it is indeed safer and more dignified than living in a tent.
 
JohnnyStrides did an interview and walkthrough with the creator of the 'Tiny Tiny Homes' prototype bike-home designed as a better alternative for temporary housing than tents in parks. Targeting a cost of $5-10k per unit.


I like the constructive solution. I'm not sure how well it would scale for the hundreds and thousands of unhoused folks, but it is indeed safer and more dignified than living in a tent.
Well, there’s always Homes by Mr. Beast.

 
This is both an inspiring and a silly article.


Toronto cannot apply the Finland model to fix the homeless issue. The author does not seem to understand the limited authority and ability wielded by our municipalities. But Queen’s Park and Ottawa could.
 
Paywall free: https://archive.is/Kz9OL

Nice try Jennifer Hedger, you NIMBY Karen. Draw a 2 Km circle around my house just east of Carlton and Parliament and you’ll find more than half of the city’s emergency shelters. I would argue that obstructionist suburban “concerned citizens” like yourself combined with the homeless industrial complex have made this so, making downtown east a dumping zone for our less fortunate residents. Well no more, the tide must raise (and lower) all boats, so every corner of this city must take its share of those in need of emergency and long term shelter.
 
Last edited:
Paywall free: https://archive.is/Kz9OL

Nice try Jennifer Hedger, you NIMBY Karen. Draw a 2 Km circle around my house just east of Carlton and Parliament and you’ll find more than half of the city’s emergency shelters. I would argue that obstructionist suburban “concerned citizens” like yourself combined with the homeless industrial complex have made this so, making downtown east a dumping zone for our less fortunate residents. Well no more, the tide must raise (and lower) all boats, so every corner of this city must take its share of those in need of emergency and long term shelter.

I love how that fraud Kevin Vuong showed up in that article too.
 
Paywall free: https://archive.is/Kz9OL

Nice try Jennifer Hedger, you NIMBY Karen. Draw a 2 Km circle around my house just east of Carlton and Parliament and you’ll find more than half of the city’s emergency shelters. I would argue that obstructionist suburban “concerned citizens” like yourself combined with the homeless industrial complex have made this so, making downtown east a dumping zone for our less fortunate residents. Well no more, the tide must raise (and lower) all boats, so every corner of this city must take its share of those in need of emergency and long term shelter.

There was nothing secret about this.

The City expropriated the property for goodness sake, a very public process.

The City Councillor also letters to nearby residents........ages ago.

****

Edit to ad, I do forget sometimes how much attention I pay to what the City is up to than the people who run it......or the media.

***

For the record, I don't actually agree with this project, but not because I oppose affordable housing, or putting same on this site. But rather, because I would prefer to see it building as affordable apartments, proper housing, given the money involved.

The City will spend more to build these per bed, than most developer do to deliver a condo; while providing a far less pleasant place to stay, that many homeless will decline due to safety, privacy and hygiene concerns.

The problem with most opponents of this shelter project is that they aren't suggesting that alternative, and in not doing so betray their true motivations.
 
Last edited:
I can't acce
There was nothing secret about this.

The City expropriated the property for goodness sake, a very public process.

The City Councillor also letters to nearby residents........ages ago.

I don't doubt you know this better than the Post reporter, but what is with the quote from Chow about how the locations are confidential and suggesting the councillor "leaked" it? Or was it confidential until the day the city announced the expropriation and the reporter was tipped before that?

“The location of shelters remains confidential,” Chow sternly pronounced. “And I sure hope the councillor (Kandavel) did not violate the confidentiality clause because the city has not announced where these shelters are.”
 
I can't acce


I don't doubt you know this better than the Post reporter, but what is with the quote from Chow about how the locations are confidential and suggesting the councillor "leaked" it? Or was it confidential until the day the city announced the expropriation and the reporter was tipped before that?

Your first line may be an incomplete thought..

****

I've heard that line about confidentiality before.......it baffles me, because the locations are generally public both before opening, and after.

I don't just mean widely circulated public either.

I mean the locations can be identified by expropriation documents, by leasing transactions, by the City openly publishing the sites in various strategies, and people certainly know where they are once they've opened, and building permits too. (not the issue here), but all the same, the supposed secretness is secret in the same way as how the caramel gets in the caramilk bar, I suppose. I mean if you're willfully blind and obtuse, I suppose you could miss it.

I will say here, I disagree with a secretive approach, I think it does breed mistrust, and it doesn't add any value for the ultimate residents or staff, as the facilities are always well known once open.
 
There are many reasons that a higher concentration of homeless occur within a defined geographic area, in this case the ‘East End’ centred on Carlton/Parliment. If the response includes a higher level of shelter housing then other areas, does the same area also see a higher % of city and independent services directed towards support of the homeless population? Homelessness does not need to be a continuing condition within the cycle of poverty, and so many other conditions (one being mental health) contribute. But often, without outside support - social, medical, financial, housing - breaking the cycle is very, very difficult for individuals. Shelter housing is just one very important piece of this often shocking societal problem. One that seems to be (thankfully) getting much more publicity then previously, in part due to policy initiatives (that often could be larger in scope and faster in implementation), but also a higher visual profile to those who
prefer to keep their lifestyle cleansed of all such Interactions.

Nimby’s are just one problem encountered by those working to offer support. Chronic lack of funding, government policy inertia (although one should be careful here as there are outstanding jobs being performed), and overburdened services (including police services ) are other key areas.
 
Passing through Kensington Market the other day, I was completely stunned to see that the huge encampment that had all but absorbed the entirety of Bellevue Square Park has been quietly removed...

How did the city accomplish this without any blowback? Also, I thought Chow had said no more clearing would occur...
 
I guess the city felt this was one way of solving the homeless issue:
IMG_7349.jpeg
 

Back
Top